52 Tuesdays

This film is both gentle because of how it was produced over 52 Tuesdays lets the story acquire a feeling of the natural-ness of time passing which for Billie is really important because 15 year olds change such a lot and this one in particular had a lot to cope with. The way the film was shot meant we got to really see Billy mature and her mother transition into James.

Billie, played by Tilda Cobham-Harvey and Del Herbet-Jane who played James were excellent in their roles, both apparently new to film acting. I especially enjoyed the performance of Cobham-Harvey whose story carried a challenging diversity as she went from being a child experimenting with sex and sexuality to having to cope with, understand and even support her transitioning mother.

A particularly sensitive exploration of the issues related to transgender.

The basic storyline of '52 Tuesdays' is summarised by IMDb and Wikipedia, so I won't rephrase this yet another time.

Viewers (like myself) might initially be skeptical of what appears to be a gimmick in the film - all the action takes place on Tuesdays - but after the first 5-10 minutes, it's clear that some Tuesdays are explicitly weighted more heavily than others, and the film is actually well organised and paced. In fact, the technical constraint of "every Tuesday" allows for novel kinds of intrigue to develop around the lives of the central characters, Billie and James.

The substantial drama of the film revolves around parallel issues relating to gender and identity in the lives of James and Billie, both played by non-professional actors who are utterly convincing (Billie becomes especially interesting in the second half, and James is compelling throughout). There are still only a handful of widely-circulated films around transgender issues, and many focus either explicitly on discrimination or on "coming out" narratives, both of which are extremely important themes rarely considered by Hollywood. Nevertheless, one original feature of this film is its more subtle exploration of James' own sense of selfhood and intimacy, especially as the medical aspects of transitioning become more complex. The attention paid to shifting familial relationships (including some quite devastating interpersonal crises), as well as the subtle exploration of adolescent sexuality, make for many surprising turns and rewards as the film develops. The film also retains some humour at crucial moments, and benefits from a restrained use of soundtrack, so the drama never feels heavy handed.

It's also worth noting that as an independent Australian film, certain cinematographic conventions may seem disorienting to viewers not familiar with this form of social realism. Nevertheless, this is not 'Snowtown' or 'Bad Boy Bubby' - '52 Tuesdays' does not exploit graphic sex or violence to shock its viewers, and keeps the focus on character development.

Overall, very strongly recommended.

The strength of 52 Tuesdays lies not in its documented revelations of a woman named Jane undergoing a transition over a 12 month period to be recognized as the man James, nor in the carefully examined complications of Billie and her coming of age story, but in the profound respect and dignity afforded the question of gender, the nuanced and detailed research and the delicacy and lightness of touch afforded subject matter that probes each one of us so deeply. The question of "gender assignment" is one that affects us all, because we engage in it habitually, thoughtlessly, on a continual basis. When you glance at any person and even most animals, your first response is without question to assign gender. Your decision about this will then determine how you communicate, how you judge, what you expect.

52 Tuesdays is a much-needed addition to the coming of age story, that turns the tables on the traditional idea of teen transformation, to look at transitioning that occurs between a mother and a daughter through the course of one year. Director Sophie Hyde filmed consecutively, the actors and crew met on Tuesdays to film, Matthew Cormack's script is written over the course of the year, usually each "Tuesday" is completed a couple of Tuesdays ahead of schedule, yet within an overall narrative framework. The film opens with Billie, (a 16 year old Tilda Cobham-Hervey) who is informed by her mother, Jane (Del Herbert-Jane) that she is to go and live with her dad, Beau Travis Williams for a year, because over the next twelve months Jane will be in transition from being identified as Jane to being identified as James. Billie and Jane decide to meet every Tuesday from four in the afternoon (after school) till ten at night to stay connected and to talk about the transitional process – if they feel like it. As Jane is working through her transition, Billie experiences one of her own in the company of two older students, Jasmine, (Imogen Archer) and Josh, (Sam Althuizen) with whom she begins to explore her own sexuality and ideas of how that is manifest in her life. As Jane experiences complications, Billie experiences her mothers transition as a rejection of motherhood, and acts out in her own ways.

Part of what makes 52 Tuesdays so fascinating is the use of film itself. As James transitions, he films himself weekly then shows this to Billie so that they can communicate about the changes occurring. But Billie is changing too, and she too decides to film herself experimenting sexually with her friends, clinging to the films she makes as a solid way of grounding her experience – and connecting with James. However, a sixteen year old filming herself and her friends having sex is not the same as the documented body image transformation James is experiencing. and trouble arises when Billie is confused by her families relationship to appearances. When her tapes are found by all concerned adults, they keep saying "what if this got out?" "What would people think?" and Billie responds with "How is this any different from the films you make?" Billie needs to learn societies judgments can be severe and can ruin people's lives, something she has only seen fought through the courage of her trans parent. Therefore, each Tuesday, we see the film being made, James' transition images and Billie's transition images, until the filming of change becomes its own form of oppression.

Outside of its unusual subject matter, 52 Tuesdays is a beautifully made film, with the difficulties of relating to the people we love coupled with our acceptance of who they are within themselves as they express themselves openly. The actors are nonprofessionals with Tilda Cobham-Hervey putting in a wonderful performance as Billie and Del Herbert-Jane superb as James. Del began working on the film as a gender diversity consultant and eventually was invited to work as an actor on the film. Del identifies as a non gender conforming individual who believes that a binary male / female system is outmoded, and they're commitment to the flawless articulation of this position informs the entire film and makes it a repeat watching experience. Unlike so many films made these days, when you watch 52 Tuesdays, you are immersed in an experience of integrity that gives appropriate informed respect to its subject treatment and uses language in an engaged and open way. 52 Tuesdays is a wonderful film, definitely one as many people as possible should see and one that contributes in a very main stream approachable way the enormously important subject matter it treats.

A high school girl begins a year of sexual experimentation when her mother decides to become a man, and two older schoolmates invite her into their bohemian clique.

This Australian indie captivates through the performances of the young leads. Tilda Cobham-Hervey as Billie, the young woman who has to cope with parental separation, mum's transgender crises, and her own burgeoning sexual awareness, is riveting, a natural beauty who is testing her own strengths and boundaries. Dad (Beau Travis Williams) is over-eager to accommodate everyone, while James (as Mum now wishes to be called) is completely self-absorbed, documenting her transformation and spending the Tuesdays together with his/her daughter only talking about her/his own issues. Little wonder Billie creates a secret space and time to nurture and document her own transformation. These naturalistic, sweet but painful scenes of emerging with the three teenagers are the film's most authentic and touching. Sam Althuizen as Josh remains a mystery, a boy included for his gender more than his personality. The beguiling Jasmine (Imogen Archer) has her own family issues, and provides a brake to any self-pity Billie might be tempted to indulge in.

Del Herbert-Jane as Jane/James embodies the fluidity in gender identification that is the film's key motif. She has a fractious relationship with her own sexually ambiguous brother Harry (Mario Späte), the film's only truly annoying character, a product both of characterisation and performance. That motif is somewhat overplayed. It is deft when the characters all sport fake facial hair for a family goof around, but is hammered home in the changing facial hair fortunes of Dad, who seems to have a different degree of beard for every scene.

Billie's movie-within-a-movie works well and is in keeping with the digital nativization of teenagers of the period. Plot is less well-handled - a rush of all the characters to the hospital seems forced, and Billie's way of marking the conclusion of the one-year separation from Mum rather too showy. The uncle's interventions also seem random and intended to inject drama rather than emerging from character. But as a rites of passage tale the film triumphs, crucially on the casting and performance of Cobham-Hervey. Reminiscent of Kiera Knightley at her best, this young actress is one to watch.

I had a sinking but familiar feeling halfway through 52 Tuesdays, a feeling that I had had while watching Mike Mills 'Beginners'. In both films a child deals with their parents coming out late in life. In Beginners, it's an adult man learning that his father is gay, in 52 Tuesdays it's a teenage girl learning her mother is transitioning into a man and now wants to be known as James. In both films, the more interesting of the story lines, belonging to the parents who are going through an incredibly tumultuous time, is sidelined in favour of the narrative of the children which is much more conventional and less interesting.

52 Tuesdays starts out with an interesting gimmick; teenage Billie is abruptly informed by her father that she will now be living with him, leaving behind the cosy bungalow home where she lives with her mother and uncle. Billie can't believe this is true but it is soon confirmed by her mother, who reveals that she is going to be transitioning into a man and needs some time to himself to adapt to his new life. Despite the fact that she is clearly hurt, Billie shifts right away into trying to accept her mother's new state of being. Despite her mother's vague wishy- washy plans, Billie sets out a schedule that involves them seeing each other every Tuesday for six hours and she accompanies her mother to therapy sessions and applauds him as he gets his first testosterone injections. But Billie clearly has some deep pain related to the transition and she chooses to let it out by playing voyeur with two older kids who make out in a closet at school. Her mother's rejection of her pushes her to finally introduce herself to these kids and it isn't long before she's interviewing them about their sexual experiences while experimenting with them herself.

The film is set up in 52 segments and was filmed over 52 weekends but while this is an interesting and at times effective filming technique it also has severe limitations. We get snip its of James's life and how hard it is for him as he faces setbacks in his transitioning but we are also missing large chunks of his story that show his point of view. Billie is also somewhat of a boring character and some of her actions, especially towards her so called friends, are borderline sociopathic, especially towards the end as she invades their boundaries and treats them abhorrently, something the narrative ultimately tries to justify.

It's really too bad because the film had an interesting concept and the stories it is trying to tell are ones that are too often unseen in cinema, but ultimately this movie feels like a shadow of what it could have been.