"The Sinner" star talks us through his arc in the show's just-finished Season 2.
Related lists from IMDb editors
Related lists from IMDb users
Title: Love & Friendship (2016)
Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.
| Cast overview, first billed only: | |||
| Kate Beckinsale | ... | Lady Susan Vernon | |
| Morfydd Clark | ... | Frederica Vernon | |
| Tom Bennett | ... | Sir James Martin | |
| Jenn Murray | ... | Lady Lucy Manwaring | |
| Lochlann O'Mearáin | ... | Lord Manwaring (as Lochlann O'Mearain) | |
| Sophie Radermacher | ... | Miss Maria Manwaring | |
| Chloë Sevigny | ... | Alicia Johnson | |
| Stephen Fry | ... | Mr. Johnson | |
 |
Jordan Waller | ... | Edward, Head Footman (as Jordan S. Waller) |
| Ross Mac Mahon | ... | Owen | |
| Frank Prendergast | ... | Approaching Gentleman | |
| Xavier Samuel | ... | Reginald DeCourcy | |
| Emma Greenwell | ... | Catherine DeCourcy Vernon | |
| Justin Edwards | ... | Charles Vernon | |
| Kelly Campbell | ... | Mrs. Cross | |
Set in the 1790s, Love and Friendship centers on beautiful widow Lady Susan Vernon, who has come to the estate of her in-laws to wait out colorful rumors about her dalliances circulating through polite society. Whilst there, she decides to secure a husband for herself and her rather reluctant debutante daughter, Frederica.
Explore popular movies available to rent or buy on Prime Video.
Perhaps this is a movie that only Jane Austen fans can love. I like Jane Austen but I don't like this movie.
The non-acting aspects of the movie were superb, and the acting overall was fine. My problems with the movie is the story itself and the director's lack of imagination with it.
The movie reflects that, as an early work of Jane Austen, it was not very sophisticated. The writing and directing did not improve on it. In effect, the movie was built on a series of tedious soliloquies by Lady Susan. The only suspense was provided by not knowing which plot elements were real or Lady Susan's fabricated illusions. After a while I realized that I was giving too much benefit to Lady Susan for fabricating illusions. She was clever but not that clever. Her cunning strategies--and the plot--mostly had a short-term horizon that never extended past the next scene.
I want to find the book and read it because I can't believe that it had some of the serious defects that the film showed. Most notably, what has been a friendly relation abruptly transformed to a discussion of marriage. I thought I had missed some bridging aspect of the dialogue but checked with my companions after the movie and they had been mystified too. I have a sense that a bridging scene was left on the editing room floor and no one noticed the abrupt change of pace.
The conclusion of the movie came too suddenly. Just was it seemed there would be another act, the house lights came on and the movie was over. I got the sense that Jane Austen ran out of ideas for the story, perhaps got bored with it, and so quickly tied up the loose ends.
To restate, the non-acting aspects of the movie were superb, and the acting itself was fine, per se. Perhaps there wasn't much material for a great movie in the original Jane Austen work, but the movie I saw could have been a lot better. I think the directing killed the potential for great acting and killed movie overall.