User reviews

This show feels oddly familiar, like something I've seen before that started with promise but quickly lost its appeal. Unfortunately, I just don't feel invested in it.

The original Suits had a unique charm, drawing us in with its engaging hooks. This series, however, misses the mark completely. The casting feels off, and where's the wit and charm? It's hard to find any here. The characters come off as cold and superficial, and while the acting is passable and the story could be interesting, there's no emotional connection to keep me watching. It feels like the only reason people are tuning in is because they're hoping for a Suits-like experience, but it's clear that something crucial is missing.

Honestly, if you're not going to capture the essence of Suits, maybe it's time to rethink the title. Change it to something more fitting, like Attorneys in LA or LA Legal-but don't call it Suits. That show had a magnetic quality that this one just doesn't replicate. I'll always love the original, and I hoped this series could bring something fresh to the table, but that's just not happening here.

This series seems destined for mediocrity, a short-lived run that will fade into obscurity.

I wish I had better news I LOVE the show Suits always will and only wish some new version of that same dynamic could make its way into my next favorite series.

I believe the formula for a successful show often includes a compelling hook, and one of the best examples of this was the character who could remember everything they ever read-pure genius. A concept like this would've done wonders for this series.

The lead character, exuding a level of masculinity that borders on toxic, was a perfect fit for the show's dynamic. What truly brought the show to life, though, was the redheaded assistant-so intelligent, she could easily run the entire operation. Her chemistry with the lead character was electric, adding depth to their interactions.

Then, there's the wildcard attorney-eccentric, with a love for mud baths and an oddball personality. Though he could be fiery, he had a charming, lovable side that balanced out his quirks. The "princess" character was another standout, offering more than just beauty-her potential for unexpected twists made her fascinating from the very start.

The writing was sharp and witty, with fast-paced editing that kept the energy high.

But Suits LA , Unfortunately, despite many of the right elements, the show just doesn't quite hit the mark. It feels like another series that will fade into obscurity. As a viewer, I can't help but think, "This should be better," but for now, I'll have to switch it off.

The Pilot has its ups and downs. It feels rushed more than anything else. There are good bits, interesting parts even, but they are short lived as everything seems to be moving so quick. Even the dialogue felt rushed at times, hard to keep track of, which makes even the great jokes ( and there are some in there ) hard to enjoy because of the pacing. It just feels like the story that took place in the pilot should have been spread out into about three episodes or so.

The plot is good, and the characters have lots of potential, but something just felt off for the entire duration of the first episode. While I absolutely do not want to compare this to the original series, and I would understand the creators wanting to try new things, I have to say that this just did not have the "Suits" vibe.

If the next few episodes slow things down a bit maybe we can get accustomed to the novel style of the series. I really have faith in Aaron Korsh and the cast and I believe Suits LA can achieve even greater heights than Suits.

Can't wait for the next episode.

Listen, this was never going to match the Suits pilot (few shows do).

And yes, Amell's character is the cocky alpha, but he's far less of a tosser than Harvey is in the first ep, so once you get that and the years of chemistry between the previous Suits cast out of your mind, this isn't a bad first episode.

Enough backstory for the.main character, with couple of good twists and generally a good cast.

I'm looking forward to seeing what happens next but it will be good to see more cohesion around storylines and actual legal cases as well as better chemistry between characters in the next episodes. Only two of the four main female characters were vaguely likeable though, so hopefully this will be addressed in the upcoming eps.

One episode in and all I could think was WTH is going on here! First, the "costumes" are ridiculous. The partner's hair and beard look like a bad Halloween custom. I couldn't watch him he looked so fake. Same with the father. Then, there was ZERO character development. It was very blocky, for a better term. One block here. Then another unrelated block. Then another unrelated block. It's like they tried to throw six seasons of the original Suits into one episode sans the good parts. No flow whatsoever. None. I found myself not even wanting to pay attention. At the end of the episode I had absolutely no vested interest in any of the characters. Not a single one was likable. Actually, I was relieved it was over. And the fun. What happened to the FUN? That was the whole Mike and Harvey thing ... Fun! And charm! And wit! None of that. The characters are robotic, tense and most definitely not enjoying themselves and I certainly did not enjoy them. Far from it. It was painful to watch.

The great thing about suits is right off the bat you get invested in these two men's lives. They let you in on a secret and we gotta keep it with them. The characters are built slowly and evenly throughout the show giving us their backstory through multiple episodes over the decade long run. We rooted for the characters from the word go. What about suits La is making me like the characters? Nothing. There is no banter, no fun, no quirky ness, no chemistry. Ted isn't as charismatic and there is no protege we care about. I dunno man it's a completely different show. It's a law show sure. But it's not SUITS. There is literally NOTHING in common between these two shows. If I was to was ncis and ncis la there are differences but the core is the same. FBI and fbi international, csi and csi Miami. The core is the same but not here. They just aren't the same. And you know what? Not loving it. I'll keep watching to give it a fair shot. But ya this is the worse spin off show I've watched. Couldn't they have at least picked one of the lawyers we already met? Scottie for example?

I am writing this review after viewing just the pilot - so it is early days! I felt it necessary to contribute for the sake of perspective as most of the early scribes are quite bizarre - representing love or hate and very little in between. The truth simply has to be somewhere in the middle! It's too early for me to give an IMDb score after just one episode but I suspect it will probably turn out to be around "6". Possibly I will go higher or lower as I see how things progress. Nonethess, I think it was a solid start and before the haters accuse me of working on the show - I don't. Heck, I don't even live in the USA (or Canada)! Why the haters seem to imagine the reboot would be a carbon copy of the original baffles me - why would it be? Conversely, how can it be such an injustice to the orginal when both series were created by the same guy? Doesn't make sense! I liked the original but thought it lost its way towards the end. I was less impressed with "Pearson" despite being a fan of Gina Torres. This latest incarnation, to me, has had a little more time and thought spent on it. The production and cinematography were top notch and Stephen Amell is a great actor and well chosen for the part he plays which is substantially different from his time as the "Green Arrow". A lot is packed into the pilot that offers potential. I shall certainly be investing some time in the series as it might just be another hit. For my part, I am glad it is not a Carbon Copy - that would have been incredibly tedious.

Suits LA had the potential to build upon the legacy of Suits, but unfortunately, it struggles due to its rushed storytelling and lack of proper character development. From the very first episode, the show moves at an unnecessarily fast pace, failing to give audiences a chance to connect with the new characters or understand their backgrounds.

Unlike Suits, where characters were introduced gradually, allowing viewers to relate to their motivations, Suits LA throws a completely new set of characters into a new setting without any proper buildup. The audience is left wondering about their personalities, work ethics, and relationships. This rapid storytelling makes it difficult to feel invested in the plot.

If the show slows down and allows its characters to develop organically, it might stand a chance. Otherwise, it risks losing the charm that made the original series so popular.

So they've opened a can of (very, very) beautiful women, gave the Green Arrow a lawyer degree and that Stuart character the most hideous beard in beard history but then forgot to write a descent storyline that would create the same kinda magic the original version of the show did? I'm not comparing it with Suits but if it carries the name at least it should remind to its big brother/sister... It also lacks chemistry between the characters...

And pls, Stuart, pls shave that ugly thing you call a beard off... or don't glue it back on the next shootingday... You look like Zack Morris from Saved by the Bell in a school play...

If you read the reviews, half of the people are upset because its too much like the old Suits and half are upset because its not enough like the old Suits.

It's a unique show that also shows the fast pace of top legal firms combined with the dirty things that go on behind the scenes...just like the original.

A crisis happens on in the first 24 hours of the show which I find compelling. At least one big unexpected twist keeps things interested.

Stephen Amell is brilliant. He's just not Harvey. But he's strong, witty, flawed, in his unique ways. He also has very unique family dynamics which make his character unique.

The Pro Bono attorney and Erika serve as two strong female leads. Neither one of them is a Donna or Rachel and looking at them that way does a disservice.

The Los Angeles focus has a lot of potential in terms of the crazy storylines that originate from the entertainment industry.

The reviews would probably be a lot higher if they didn't call it Suits Los Angeles but I'm sure they'll make more money and get more ratings out or it than if they didn't .

It's got a wise old man, a brother with downs syndrome, miserably corny writing, Stephen Amell and some other pretty faces. There was a scene where this guy said "Have you ever taken an acting class?" to Stephen's character. It was the best joke I've heard all day. There's also Eobard Thawne, who is the arrow's dad.

If the writing was a bit less painful, I might've continued watching this. I may or may not put it up for background noise as I did with the original Suits. It pales in comparison to the original which got repetitive after a few seasons.

This is gonna be a guilt watch whenever I do come back to this, I would not recommend at all though.

Seems like they dropped 15 characters into the proverbial glass law office, and said, "Go!" Things and people jumped around so fast you can't get attached. And I don't like the show if I can't connect with the primary characters. Taylor Sheridan knows how it's done. While they are attempts at cute banter, it's over played. Alice Lea (Leah) over acts, Josh McDermott needs to dump the beard and someone should buy Steven Arielle a suit, even in L. A. and for those looking for a link back to the "real" Suits, nothing but the music. Makes me wish even one or 2 old characters had moved out to LA so you wold have something to hold on to.

Suits: LA faced harsh early criticism, largely based on its first episode. Many expected it to replicate Suits instantly, but the show takes time to develop. While the humor feels a bit off compared to the original, the series gradually finds its rhythm.

The characters evolve with each episode, becoming more engaging, and the legal drama itself is well-executed. Unlike Suits, it carves its own identity while maintaining the legal intensity fans enjoy. Though different, it's not nearly as bad as early ratings suggest. Give it time-it hooks you in with its intriguing cases and evolving dynamics.

I watched the original Suits. I decided to be open minded about Suits LA...in fact 30minutes into the pilot I needed to change the channel. Oh honestly it had nothing to do with comparing the shows then and now. Suits LA is boring and disappointing. I like Stephen Amel but his character in this series doesn't work. He is annoying...sorry!! The rest of the cast and their characters...well let's just say are weak.

Now if I were to compare this Suits LA to the original Suits. I would be happier watching the reruns. I know I sound harsh but I was so excited for the series and I just feel so disappointed.

The only thing Suits LA has in common with the original Suits is the theme song and profession. The actors and plots are boring. There's no magic, humor, witty banter, or sassy walk and talks. No real courtroom drama. Sadly, there's no reason to watch other than Gabriel Macht's upcoming appearance. But even he can't save this one. You have to wonder if the writers even watched the original. It left me wanting to binge it. When Suits became the most streamed show of all time, most of the original cast expressed interest in returning for a reboot. You have to wonder why more of them aren't in Suits LA. They were worth the extra money.

For any successful television series, the viewer has to have a character to root for and this show does not contain such a character. It doesn't even have any interesting characters. The writing could have been done by AI. Every actor in the cast is completely generic and blah. Its central casting 101. Steven Amell is likeable but that's basically all. Another missing element is, for lack of a better term, a "Donna character"; The strong, whip-smart, sassy female counterpart to the male leads' hard driving, often mortally questionable antics. The snappy back and forth dialogue is also missing. Basically, every aspect about Suits that made it a hit with viewers is missing. No reason to continue watching in my opinion and this is NOT unfairly comparing it to the first show because if it was good on its own merit I would have been in. Anyone giving this show a 9 or10 rating with "excellent" is fake, being paid, or works on the show.

You may or may not agree with this review, but I guarantee you- Suits LA will get cancelled by summer.

What were they thinking? Well ok, you want to continue the story, but give the viewers some credit, you don't have make a carbon copy of the last one right down to the camera view points and dramatic poses.

This really does watch like kids at a school play pretending to act as their teachers. And to make matter worse the first episode of is a total rehash of an old one but with less leaning to logic and legal facts.

I can't see this lasting long, it's so plastic and fake ... no wait perhaps it'll be a big hit with today's audience who seem only to want flashing eyes and deceit.

This is best missed.

After the first three episodes I'm still waiting for that one attention grabbing episode! This series has too much seriousness and not enough small witty comebacks. Even the first episode of the original series had just enough to consume my undivided attention. I have watched the original series completely 14 times and it never gets old. Suits L. A. I understand is not the original or a continuation but it's lacking the vibes. There's no Dana like character or a Luis type of character, and both of those created their own side stories within the series. This series is supposed to be based on a law firm dealing with the film industry, however, there hasn't been much of that in detail intertwined with the the overall concept of the show. I'm hopeful for a second season but at this point, especially if theirs not many episodes in season one, it's going to take a lot to attract the audience from the original series.

Geesh - all of these women look completely alike. Except for the blonde with the bun it's difficult to distinguish one actress from another. They all have the same hairstyle, the same hair colour, the same make up, the same facial expressions, the same styling etc. Nowhere near the original Suits - everyone was individual in that show. There were redheads and blondes and brunettes and bald men etc. It seems I'm constantly trying to determine who the brunette is. It's a very difficult task to follow the original Suits and attempt to replicate it. Unfortunately this show does not even come close.

The haters that cling to the original expecting the same show is to put it mildly just plain stupid. Stephen Amell is glorious in the role and all characters have their own unique charm just like the original cast did. If you expect Harvey and Mike all over again then go back and watch the original. The acting is on point, the twists are great, and the show has a great potential. So much room for growth and expanding the story. Can't wait to see how Harvey's role will be incorporated. Just ignore the complaints as they're a 100% related with just not being the original and give it a shot. It has all the ingredients of a hit.

UNDERSTAND THAT THIS SHOW IS NOT A SEQUEL TO SUITS. ITS JUST A SHOW THAT IS SET IN THE SAME UNIVERSE.

I've read countless reviews and comments that mention something about the original Suits.. This show is a standalone that is set in the same universe and doesn't have to be anything remotely like 'Suits'. (not everything has to be like the MCU lmao)

Give the show a chance, let it be its own thing & I'm willing to bet you enjoy it. I did rate it a 7 but considering I have 'Suits' rated a 9, so far a 7 for Suits LA is solid. I'm probably more on the 6.5 side but we will see with time. There is so much potential and the fact that there has only been 6 episodes and people are destroying this. So much room for character development still to happen. Just trust me, go into it and don't expect it to be like 'Suits' and you'll be hooked by episode 3.

Harvey Spector or Ted Black? Harvey Spector total sounds like a kick ass name. Ted Black, boring as hell. Even Louis Litt sounds cooler. The Donna. Waiting and hoping for their return. The actors really embodied their characters. Green Arrow is all I see. It might take time for people to embrace his new character but people who are tuning in are fans of the original and they want that same feeling. Suits L. A though only one episode is not looking too good. Of all the lawyer shows from the past you have to have good characters who are interesting and makes fans want to be those character. Let's hope for a better second episode.

So I wanted to love this so much especially because my nephew is in the show. He did a good job, but I felt like they rushed the show and they should've slowed down the pilot, we needed to fall in love with the characters before they did what they did.

I think they could've spent the first episode on working a couple cases and giving us to fall in love with the characters. But instead, they rushed it to give us a big twist so we would all be amazed and talk about it today. People are talking about it, but a lot of people are very disappointed And that includes my family.

My nephew told me to hang in there that there is going to be a lot more good episodes coming up, so I am going to continue to watch it, and I hope y'all will too.

This has a lot of potential, but a few flaws. Fairly decent ensemble cast and each one seems to offer a like/dislike nature of their personas. The show is stylish and the pacing is good. The banter is sometimes clever and funny, keep it going.

I hope that the Hollywood/celebrity side of this law firm isn't the main focus of every episode. There are so many more interesting cases and causes that I want to watch rather than pandering to whining actors and giving B and D-listers residual benefits. And btw, please stop the name dropping. No one likes it in real life and it's useless in a TV series.

With all the allusion and build up to secrets and backstories, I hope future disclosure and reveals will be interesting and surprising.

General notes: 1) Don't let the cursing increase or be a replacement for intelligent responses/writing 2) Don't get stuck in the 50 shades of teal and brown décor 3) Kudos for keeping PDA and explicit sex/nudity to a minimum.

It was a very very weird episode - it felt like they picked a random episode from the line up and uploaded it. Everything feels so abrupt and rushed like it was a montage of random moments. There are no proper character introductions or emotions, they just expect you to go with whatever is happening. The acting is pretty bad and the leads don't do any justice.

When I first saw Harvey and Donna, there was an instant likeability about them. They had excellent energy and personality. All of it is just missing from here.

I have no idea what's in the future episodes, but it was such a bad first impression.

Judging from the series opener this is just an attempt to milk the "suits" brand.

There is no story, good character, or connection with the law. The only thing related to law is that they are in a law firm.

In the original Suits, the very first episode was excellent in establishing a base story (which the viewers could understand) and built from there, however, in Suits LA, it leaves the viewers with more questions than answers.

Judging just from the pilot episode the series is a huge letdown for fans who expect something that even remotely resembles the original suits, the series might have been better if it had been a new IP rather than trying to associate itself with Suits.