Paradies: Hoffnung (2013) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
7 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
"Minimalistic, characteristic, sociological and atypical..."
Sindre Kaspersen25 April 2013
Austrian screenwriter, producer and director Ulrich Seidl's fifth feature film which he co-wrote with screenwriter Veronika Franz and co-produced, is the last part of his partly theological Paradise trilogy which was preceded by "Paradise: Love" (2012) and Paradise: Faith" (2012). It premiered In competition at the 63rd Berlin International Film Festival in 2013, was shot on location in Austria and is a Austria-Germany-France co-production which was produced by producers Philippe Bober and Christine Ruppert. It tells the story about a 13-year-old girl named Melanie who whilst her mother named Teresa is on vacation in Kenya is taken to a diet camp by her aunt named Anna Maria where she befriends a girl named Verena and takes a liking to a doctor.

Precisely and statically directed by European filmmaker Ulrich Seidl, this quietly paced fictional tale which is narrated from multiple viewpoints though mostly from the main character's point of view, draws a heartrending portrayal of a girl's experiences whilst participating in a residential program. While notable for its naturalistic milieu depictions, distinct production design by production designers Andreas Donhauser and Renate Martin, cinematography by American cinematographer Edward Lachman and Austrian cinematographer Wolfgang Thaler and use of colors, this somewhat character-driven and dialog-driven story about friendship and hope depicts a mindful study of character where the rare humor occurs as a result of the at times rhythmic and subtle continuity.

This humane, involving and somewhat surreal sequel which is set mostly at a weight loss resort in Austria and where an adolescent girl begins looking for the same thing that her mother is looking for in Kenya, is impelled and reinforced by its cogent narrative structure, substantial character development, colorful characters, sparse dialog and the reverent and commendable acting performances by actress Melanie Lenz in her debut feature film role, Austrian actor Joseph Lorenz and actress Verena Lehbauer. A minimalistic, characteristic, sociological and atypical coming-of-age drama where Ulrich Seidl's dystopic universe which may not be for all tastes and where he has gone to the extremities of humanity with a bittersweet, realistic and somewhat bleak though far from melancholic point of view comes to an end.
27 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this
7/10
A tale of finding hope
Reno Rangan27 December 2013
The third and final movie of the 'Paradise' trilogy which sets in the summer holiday. Just like the previous two movies this one happens to the parallel timeline but in different locations with different theme and people. The movie which unfolds the story of 'Hope' of a teen girl and her summer vacation at weight loss camp. She was left there by her aunt and before that by her mother in her aunt's house. So all the three movies were interconnected by the characters from one family. And this, the last movie of the trilogy briefs the teenagers issues especially the fat ones and their perspective.

The 13 year old Melanie was sent to the weight loss camp in her summer holiday as per the agreement from her mother. As she joins the others from the camp her innocence seemed to be gone. Unexpectedly she undergoes her first love experience and expects to lose her virginity. On the other side of the story, the friends hangout and partying at late night puts further trouble to her relationship with whom she considered her boyfriend.

This final episode of the trilogy portrayed from a girl's angle which definitely stands as the title promised. The director again did not hesitate to give his new and experimental approach to the problems faced by the people in the contemporary world. His bold attempt is what gave us the three spectacular movies which deals on the different contents and characters. Definitely such movies are not made to make money. But to show the people from different parts of the world about the direction of travelling new culture over the old. These movies are not for entertainment, if you are aware what you watching and what's the purpose of it then you won't be a disappoint much. Like I said three movies, three different locations, three different people and for three different audiences (unless you are a movie buff who watch all the three).
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this
6/10
Hope in youth
paul2001sw-128 January 2017
Ulirch Seidl's 'Paradise' trilogy focuses on female unhappiness: the first two movies were almost unwatchably painful, as they charted their protagonists' unfortunate plights and self-harming behaviour. The third film is not quite so gloomy, although its title 'Hope' is almost certainly meant ironically, but there is hope here, if only because it's younger characters still have the chance to turn around their lives. Equally, the film's purpose seems a little less clear than its predecessors: some overweight, but basically normal teenagers attend a weight-loss camp, where they face a measure of abuse from the adults who run it. The most poignant moment in the film comes when the lead character, the daughter of the protagonist in the first film, desperately calls her mother (who we know to be trapped in her own form of hell), a sign of a human bond that has hitherto not been revealed. Overall, it's still hard to know what to make of the trilogy, except as a series of observations on quite how hard it is to make meaningful connections with those around us.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this
6/10
If you're happy and you know it, clap you're fat
OJT24 January 2014
Paradise: Hope is about 13 year old Melanie, which is sent on diet camp in the Austrian mountains, while her mother is on sex vacation in Kenya.

The third installment of the Paradise trilogy by Austrian Ulrich Seidl is not as great as the first two think. Still it's both interesting and funny, as an odd view of Austrian life. All film's are connected, as they are all about three persons in the same family, still they can without any problem be seen as individual films. But this, which I find the least interesting, is more interesting, if you think if the trilogy as a whole.

The three film's really worth a good discussion, and for a film club this is really something to enjoy. The films are all very realistic, and all are rising questions, without giving any answers. All the films balances ethical questions. What do we think about this, and that? It could all happen, not only in Austria, but elsewhere as well. Lines to cross, or not. Humans seeking out, trying, doing strange things, searching for either hope, God, emotions, recognition, satisfaction, life, entertainment... We could go on...

It's also interesting, this film as both a trilogy and as in it self, that it balances right and wrong with enjoyment/fun and sadness/tragedy, with seriousness and the comic of it all. It's a slice of life, of struggling with our demons. Seidel balances well. Keeps away from real controversy, but more than once approaches the nasty dilemma, but it's always terminated before it's getting really serious.

All films are kept in the same style, obviously, though filmed in very different environment. Slow, dwelling pictures, but never without any reason. The camera is still, often in a not to distant view, clinical, bleak. Still fresh and actually pastel. Probably not without reason, still not sure why.

Seidel is another very interesting Austrian director, which differs from the lot. Like Haneke he had a very distinct style. Very different from each other, and in a strong filming language. Simply interesting. I'm sure this trilogy will be seen upon as interesting for years to come. Deservedly so.

When this is only getting a 6/10 from me, as opposed to the better ratings for the first two, this is due to the lesser interesting and driving plot. It fades out without giving a real impression, and a small disappointment lingers, since the first was so good. Paradise: Love was interesting in any levels. If thus bad. Er the first, and he first the last, it would have given a greater impact. Maybe that is what Seidl wants us to discover. If I am to watch the three films again, I surely would reverse the trilogy, and try to discover if there's more to it than I saw during the first watch.
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this
2/10
The hope that the end of the film arrives
Andres-Camara10 October 2017
Warning: Spoilers
For my taste, this is the worst of the trilogy. And that is already difficult. In the others there was a small story, but it is that in this there is not even that.

I still do not know what the title of hope is coming from, what hope? The sequences are eternal. They never end. But they do not count anything. They are repetitive. Tell the same thing over and over again. On this occasion, only at the end begins to tell something different and is lost and no longer counts.

Would we say the actors are okay? Well, counting that it is not known that it is counted and that many planes are without dialogue. The actors are.

Not that it is boring, not that it has a slow tempo, is that to know that you have to see a story and thus you see how the account, but it is that there is no history nor there is nothing.

Photography, like the rest, does not count either. But it is normal as it will be if there is no story. He has nothing to tell.

The direction, telling that he is not directing anything, that he does not know that he is counting, that he only knows to roll in general plane and never moves the camera, nor does he change the plane never, although it is necessary. Someone put the camera in the bottom of each place and there it stayed.

If with the others you seem to have wasted time with this, it is clear
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this
6/10
Seidl closes it on a more positive note
Warning: Spoilers
"Paradies: Hoffnung" or "Hope" is the 3rd and final installments to Ulrich Seidl's "Paradise" trilogy. After fairly heavy material in "Love" and "Faith", this one is a bit lighter. However, it still has its serious moments. It is the shortest from the 3 movies as it only runs for roughly 90 minutes and also the one that got the least awards attention. Still, it is a pretty good film in my opinion. The protagonist here is the obese daughter/niece from the protagonists of the other 2 films. Hofstätter has a cameo in here as well at the beginning. The girl's name is Melanie and she is sent to summer camp to lose weight. Basically, for the entire film we watch her routine at the camp. Seidl chooses a mix of comedy and drama again. The tough sports coach is fun to watch with his determination and lets be honest: fat children making sports is a funny sight, no offense. When one after the other makes forward rolls from the left of the screen to the right, there is something hilarious to it. Another funny scene would be when the gang tries to steal candy at night and they get caught by the PE teacher again.

However, this is by no means a comedy. There are many serious moments in here. The P.E. coach is for the humor, the doctor is for the drama as he is at least as attracted to the main character as she is to him. This results in many complicated situations and, ultimately, in heartbreak. But the girl is really only looking for somebody to understand her, enjoy spending time with her, which was probably something her mother neglected, even if she came across as a caring mother from the first film in my opinion. Anyway, the girls' calls say a lot in this film. She does not want to ruin her mother's holiday in Kenya (now that was a holiday!), so she says it is all good at the camp, but she tells the truth to her father because she knows he won't care anyway. In the end, however, she is also honest towards her mother. Her mother is her ultimate attachment figure again after the doctor "broke up" with her and her best friend left her alone at the club when she was in really bad condition.

I have never been at such a camp because I never had weight problems and looking at this one here, this may have been a good thing. But even with all the drama going on, I felt that, overall, this was a lighter watch than the other 2 films, especially "Faith". I definitely recommend this trilogy, very well done from Seidl and everybody who worked on this massive project, especially the 3 lead actresses. Now let me clap my (non-existing) fat because I'm happy I got to watch these. Thumbs up and I recommend "Hope" just like I recommend the previous 2.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this
6/10
Someone did not like my first review.
petarmatic19 March 2014
We find out that Anna Maria has a niece and that she is a daughter of the women sex vacationing in Kenya. So trilogy starts to make sense.

Girls in their teens. The fat once. Fighting with pillows and talking about sex. But then the hairy Guy comes to train them and teach them how to try to loose fat. ;) I think that sending girls to the village is an idiotic thing, but girls who escaped, and went to a night club, dancing girls really gives us HOPE! I find this film weaker link of the other two. Especially the second one. Faith. Glaube. So powerful, that this one looks weaker. But it should not be underestimated. It should be watched together with other two. Very powerful trilogy!
3 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews