Critic Reviews



Based on 15 critic reviews provided by
As a fleeting essay on sexual biases, it encourages a thoughtful debate, but leaves too many questions dangling to solidify into much beyond a dashed experiment.
Franco has finally delivered a side project that does at least some justice to his eclectic artistic ambitions.
Unfocused lapses aside, though, the film is intriguing and discomforting in equal measure, using its brief running time to frame thoughtful, boundary-pushing questions.
So what are you looking at, really? Is the movie a bait-and-switch? Probably. The film has fun with the idea that nobody would have gotten involved were it not for the chance to work with James Franco and perhaps perform in a sex scene with James Franco (there are no sex scenes involving James Franco, if you were wondering).
Slant Magazine
With Travis Mathews's help, James Franco's persona forms a kind of symmetry: 1980's dubious homophobia against 2013's risible homophilia.
The Dissolve
Interior. Leather Bar.’s intriguing curiosity provides ample food for thought, in part because it’s the rare film that devotes much of its running time to its own principals discussing what, if anything, the film ultimately means.
The Hollywood Reporter
While Leather Bar will surely make some viewers itchy, its most compelling subject isn't whether straight guys can stand to watch one man pleasuring another. More interesting is the question of what would make this project art as opposed to porn.
Interior. Leather Bar ultimately rings hollow in its diatribe and agenda because its chief instigator refuses to open up.
A partly authentic, partly scripted behind-the-scenes featurette that never quite conveys the star’s “high/curious” interest in all things taboo.
Village Voice
It's a particularly risible nothing whose premise alone betrays the paucity of Franco's imagination and wit.

More Critic Reviews

See all external reviews for Interior. Leather Bar. (2013) »

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Reviews | User Ratings | External Reviews