1 user 2 critic

My Brooklyn (2012)

Director Kelly Anderson's personal journey as a Brooklyn 'gentrifier' to understand the forces reshaping her neighborhood along lines of race and class. The film reframes the gentrification... See full summary »


Kelly Anderson
1 win & 1 nomination. See more awards »


Add Image Add an image

Do you have any images for this title?



Director Kelly Anderson's personal journey as a Brooklyn 'gentrifier' to understand the forces reshaping her neighborhood along lines of race and class. The film reframes the gentrification debate to expose the corporate actors and government policies driving displacement and neighborhood change. Written by Anonymous

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis

Plot Keywords:

place name in title | See All (1) »



Official Sites:

Official site





Release Date:

2 June 2012 (USA) See more »

Also Known As:

Моят Бруклин See more »

Company Credits

Show more on IMDbPro »

Technical Specs



See full technical specs »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

Connects the dots between planning and building
18 June 2014 | by MacCarmelSee all my reviews

This is a great story and an excellent film that illustrates the how and why of urban renewal projects. "Urban Renewal" has many synonyms including redlining, segregation, gentrification and revitalization. The end result is the same: removal of people of color and those of a lower socio-economic class and turning over both land and profit to a population consisting mostly of white, wealthy, upper class folk. And no matter how much our city, county, state and federal officials protest --- the fact is that the process is pretty much the same in all our communities, large and small. Back room deals get made between government officials who are supposed to be looking out for the best interests of said community and balancing that with need and opportunity for smart change and growth. Instead what typically happens is the act of back scratching between public and private entities that results in developers getting most or all of what they want, including millions in giveaways and tax breaks (AKA "subsidies"), officials being allowed to take home a piece of the profit and existing residents and business owners being shut out of the whole thing. Not only does the public have no influence in the decision but their elected leaders have thrown them under the bus by not requiring developers to do much, or anything, in the way of preserving affordable housing or public spaces. Or to contribute what they actually owe to the tax base. Public comment meetings take place only after all decisions have been made and things are already in motion. It's just that no one will speak that truth out loud.

There are two ways to look at something like this. 1) The process of how decisions get made and projects get built in this country is seriously broken. Or -- 2) The process works just fine. Because profit is the only thing that we worship and the only thing worth pursuing. I think we like to believe that we are a melting pot country that values the benefits of diversity when the real truth is that everything about our public policy says we only value profit and the resulting segregated, homogenized, chain store culture. And we can only place blame on our elected officials to a certain degree because it is us, after all, who voted them into office. And even though we can fire them at any time -- we apparently choose not to do so.

1 of 2 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you? | Report this
Review this title | See one user review »

Contribute to This Page

Check Out What's Playing on IMDb Freedive

See what movies and TV series you can watch for free today, and visit IMDb Freedive for even more. Select any poster below to play the movie!

Find more things to watch

Stream Trending Movies With Prime Video

Enjoy a night in with these popular movies available to stream now with Prime Video.

Start your free trial

Recently Viewed