Watch Now

From $1.99 (SD) on Prime Video

A young medical student discovers that something sinister is going on in her hospital after routine procedures send more than a few seemingly healthy patients into comas on the operating table.




7 nominations. See more awards »





Series cast summary:
...  Susan Wheeler 2 episodes, 2012
...  Mark Bellows 2 episodes, 2012
...  Dr. Agnetta Lindquist 2 episodes, 2012
...  Dr. Howard Stark 2 episodes, 2012
...  Dr. Nelson 2 episodes, 2012
...  Oren 2 episodes, 2012
...  Peter Arno 2 episodes, 2012
...  Geoffrey Fairweather 2 episodes, 2012
...  Paul Carpin 2 episodes, 2012
...  Hanna Goldberg 2 episodes, 2012
...  Mrs. Emerson 2 episodes, 2012
...  Professor Hillside 2 episodes, 2012
...  Detective Jackson 2 episodes, 2012
...  Nancy Greenly 2 episodes, 2012
...  Dr. Dan Ramirez 2 episodes, 2012
...  Police Captain 2 episodes, 2012
...  Jefferson Guard Maguire 2 episodes, 2012
...  Fiona 2 episodes, 2012
...  Liza 2 episodes, 2012
Nicholas Tecosky ...  Vanya 2 episodes, 2012
...  Dr. George Chandler 2 episodes, 2012
...  Jennifer Rendall 2 episodes, 2012
...  Dr. Oswald Taylor 2 episodes, 2012
...  Nurse Lena Montoya 2 episodes, 2012
...  Sean Berman 2 episodes, 2012
...  Arno's Landlord / ... 2 episodes, 2012
...  Tour Guide 2 episodes, 2012
...  Chambers 2 episodes, 2012
...  Fiance / ... 2 episodes, 2012
...  James Harper 2 episodes, 2012
...  Dr. Cartwright 2 episodes, 2012
...  Break-in teen / ... 2 episodes, 2012


A young medical student discovers that something sinister is going on in her hospital after routine procedures send more than a few seemingly healthy patients into comas on the operating table.

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis


Don't let them put you under.


TV-14 | See all certifications »


Official Sites:

Official site



Release Date:

3 September 2012 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

Koma  »

Filming Locations:

Company Credits

Show more on  »

Technical Specs


Sound Mix:


Aspect Ratio:

16:9 HD
See  »

Did You Know?


The James Woods character, "Howard Stark," has the same name as Tony "Iron Man" Stark's father. See more »


Version of Coma (1978) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

"If it ain't broke, don't mend it" : sadly, this is one remake too many
11 June 2013 | by See all my reviews

What a shame: all but the last 30mins or so of this drama are classic TV movie: badly scripted & fundamentally disjointed.

The trailer promised cameos by a range of superb actors. This boded well . . . but the performers were then completely wasted. A few key phrases and 'masterful' TV-drama looks, and they were gone. What a shameful squandering of the talents of James Woods, Richard Dreyfus, etc.

I can't say I was surprised. Few TV movies make 'the grade' in storytelling. And few remakes (big-screen or otherwise) ever match the quality of the original. So a drama that fits into both categories has much to fight against to attain any form of success; which this TV remake does not.

The one redeeming feature of this version of 'Coma' may be for those viewers who haven't seen the excellent 1978 film original. The Genevieve Bujold version sticks in my mind over 25 years since I first saw it! For those new to the story this drama may hold its own. After all, it will have no alternative against which to be measured.

But I still feel that, whereas in the 1970s the concept of this kind of scientific experimentation was unknown & shocking to the layman, to a modern audience it is all too familiar & newsworthy. So the shock level of the story is lost; which is after all the mainstay of the plot.

The usual mistakes of cheap movie-making occur: story threads are left incomplete, the plot continuity has gaping holes in it, and the character development is threadbare. One character {I will leave the name left blank here: to avoid spoilers!} is in one scene adamant that they want to continue their affair with their lover, then in the very next scene are suddenly keen to throw that affair over: with no real explanation to the observer for such a key change of heart. More 'jumping' occurs when the role of at least two of the 'baddies' is left unclear. Overall there is too much left unexplained. Another character turns 'tail' in loyalties at the end with – again – no in-depth explanation to the viewer as to the reason for his change of heart. This film is simply a case of too many characters & not enough characterisation.

Yet another example of a poorly put together TV film for which one cannot blame the actors. It is the material they are working with that is at fault, not their acting performance.

There is also a signature of TV movie 'dross': an extended stalking scene. It is ridiculously long, and is neither necessary nor well made. In the same scene there is even a long-winded monologue – over an intercom! – by one of the 'baddies'. It made me think of a plagiarised Jack Nicholson in 'The Shining', without being anywhere near as riveting or chilling.

Geena Davis is given a lot of screen time, but the camera seems to just dwell on her pretty face rather than let her get to grips with what could have been a more in-depth role. Another wasted talent.

The script is patchy; not as bad as it might be perhaps – and it may well be another skill area in the production process that causes this problem in the end product – but the screen play is not good enough to link the scenes together and make a substantial movie of this.

In the last hour or so we finally get to see what is going on 'behind the scenes'. And the pace becomes more appropriate, with the scenes finally beginning to connect a little more. But it is too little, too late.

And, being a TV movie, of course we get to see too much blood & guts in the final moments; in place of the necessary development of the back plot. Lots of gory: not enough story.

We never get to hear more than a few words of explanation of the ethics of the experiments, or the motivation for it. This is crucial to the whole storyline. We need to hear the psychology & drive behind what is going on. But there is none told to the viewer.

Sadly, there seems little if no thought behind this film. It is, frankly, just superficial popcorn drivel.

Bizarrely, the credit sequence at the end is the best part of the whole production!: original & stylish.

The 1978 film was quietly intelligent. This remake, sadly, is empty of any style or substance – and 'loudly' so. What a shame that those two greats – the Scott Brothers – couldn't leave well alone. After all, if it ain't broke, don't mend it! I only assume, being producers, that they had little to do with the creative process. So I shall leave 'Blade Runner' & 'Top Gun' as happy memories to remind me what skilled film-makers they can be.

4 of 7 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you? | Report this
Review this title | See all 15 user reviews »

Contribute to This Page

Stream Trending TV Series With Prime Video

Explore popular and recently added TV series available to stream now with Prime Video.

Start your free trial