To win back his ex-girlfriend, a conservative accountant enlists the help of an exotic dancer to guide him on a quest for sexual experience, leading him into a world of strip clubs, sensual massage parlors, cross-dressing and S & M.
Thirty-seven year old Winnipeg-based accountant Jordan Abrams, a proverbial doormat of a man, has pined after Rachel Stern since he was twelve. He finally got her to be his girlfriend last year after she being a peripheral or not so peripheral part of his life all these years. Now, in a relationship for a year, Jordan plans on asking her to marry him on a week-long romantic vacation they are taking to Niagara Falls. Rachel not only decides not to go on the trip, but dumps him when he, learning that she isn't going, asks her to marry him the day before the trip instead. The primary reason she dumps him?: he's lousy in bed, she not being able to envision bad, boring sex with him for the rest of her life. Rachel convinces him to take the vacation by himself, instead hanging out in Toronto with his college friend Dandak, his return from the vacation when they will talk about the break-up in more detail. Dandak, a sex machine, sees his role in his mending his friend's broken heart as ... Written by
The first day of shooting was on a Sunday. The scenes in the 'rub and tug' were shot in a working 'massage parlor', and Sunday was the only day of the week that they were closed. See more »
In some scenes Jordan's earpiece is visible See more »
[starting under her breath then audibly to a shout]
You fucking little fucker, you did mean those things. I know, my God, I knew you did. Fuck you. Fuck you.
Fine. So fuck you.
Oh, fuck you harder. You don't even know what the fuck, you... Fuck you.
You f... You fucking little motherfucker. I'll fuckin' fuck you.
[yelling with obscene gestures]
You're a fuckin' fuck hard. Fuck you and fuck...
Hey, you know what? Fuck you, you fuckstress. You fucking fuckstress.
[...] See more »
This movie is a wolf in sheep's clothing. It presents itself as the stereotypical commercial comedy. All the characters are easily understandable stereotypes. It's main storyline is basically a total cliché.
So why is it different? It breaks every one of the cliché's it uses. It tells us the story of what happens when our stereotypes become real, actually live their lives. And its easiness about sex is refreshing too, it's not a pornographic movie at all. Sex is just an aspect of it. And yet, even though of the controversial content, if you don't think about it: it's just another boring commercial romance comedy.
(So: controversial perfectly hidden in a cliché feelgood. Remarkable really.) (Did I mention it's excellently produced. Seriously. Excellent production value!) (I wonder if I'd still think this positively about it if I watched it a second time. I guess some parts were pretty weak. But I practically wonder if it's intentional. Nice!)
18 of 31 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?
| Report this