Bloody Mary (2011) User Reviews

Why is there no "0"?

[flipmode-ca · 1/10 · 16 February 2013]

I cannot believe how mad this movie made me!!!! Every character in it was so detestable there was no possible way Bloody Mary could of killed them enough times. The acting was unacceptable. The violence, which is why we would usually consider watching this in the first place, was almost laughable in quality. The pacing of the movie was unbearable. The only good part of the whole movie, Ron Jeremy, was such a small part.

I don't understand how anyone that had any part of this movie can even show their faces in public. I'm ashamed that I even watched it, for free. If I paid to see it, I would probably be catatonic right now.

In closing, I never expected to this movie to be great, I had low expectations going into it. But I did expect to be entertained and I was miserable the whole way through. Please please please avoid this trash!

This piece of s**t will be banging on my rib cage for a long time :(

Bloody Mary 3D

[a_baron · 3/10 · 22 January 2015]

How to begin a horror film? A gratuitously lengthy steamy session of naked lesbian sex in 1904? When hubby comes home unexpectedly and catches wifey at it...how many redblooded males have fantasised about this sort of thing, especially with a stunningly attractive blonde and redhead? But not this guy, instead of joining in, he murders them both. Fast forward to the present day, and the plot is revealed. This is actually a well-known urban legend, that of Bloody Mary. Call her name when you stand in front of the mirror, and if you give the wrong reaction when she appears, it's curtains.

It's also very silly, but if you don't mind a bit of blood, the naked Mary is looking remarkably fit considering she's been dead for over a century. What else is there to recommend it? Well, the soundtrack is not bad, nor are some of the one-liners, like: "We needed something quick and cheap; for some reason I thought of you".

It pains me, real bad.

[DustinRahksi · 1/10 · 12 July 2013]

This is going to be a short review since, well, nothing happened. I know the film is really low budget, but that doesn't mean make it like sh-t, my god it kills me to see films that lack heart and passion. I'm just saying, give me this films budget and I'll make the best damn film I can. Anyway, I always thought this was a porno, well it opens with porn, but slows way down after. If you think Mary's death is a spoiler, than you have problems.

The film opens with one of the worst lesbian sex scenes I've ever seen. Literally that is the first thing you see, by the way they show everything. It even has some stock BS music playing over it. So a religious guy comes in and kills the two women, you know because murder isn't a sin. A guys fantasy right in front of him doesn't even faze him. And after that there was no script, just people talking, and occasionally bloody Mary walking around naked. She eventually puts panties on, but nothing else. Who would be afraid of that if they saw her. She's like Michael Myers, just slowly walking around, creeping in corners. Nobody would ever be afraid of her. And that's all that happens. This seriously started out as a ten minute porno, but some jacka** made it into a feature length film. It's trash a** garbage. I could remake it, and you know, put some effort into it, and actually make it a horror film, even though it is a p-ss poor story.

Sorry for the language, it's just better helps describe this trash heap. Since when is there a prohibited word feature when I'm trying to write a review, I hope that doesn't effect my older ones.

I would give anything to un-see the mental torture.

[natekochis · 1/10 · 20 January 2018]

There are approximately 171,476 words in the english language. None of them, and I mean NONE of them combined into sentences and paragraphs could articulate how deeply and passionately I hate this garbage. Why was this made? It is beyond laughably bad. It was like watching a car accident in slow motion, it was slow with no real pacing, and I couldn't look away.

Do you feel that boom boom baby banging on my ribcage?

[BA_Harrison · 4/10 · 9 October 2022]

Bloody Mary 3D is bloody awful, but I didn't hate it: it's just too bad not to find just a bit entertaining.

The film opens in the early 1900s, as two women -- redhead Mary Worth (Veronica Ricci) and a hot blonde -- get down to some steamy lesbian sex (both are clean shaven down below and Mary has silicon-enhanced tits -- so much for historical accuracy). The women are interrupted by Mary's husband, who grabs a knife and punishes them for their sins.

In the present day, two women break into a warehouse hoping to appear in the latest music video by rising 'rockstar' Matt Elias (Derek Jameson). To pass the time, they invoke the spirit of 'Bloody Mary', who kills them both. When Matt and his crew arrive, they also encounter the angry ghost, who bumps them off one by one.

When the best performances come from ex-pornstar Ron 'The Hedgehog' Jeremy and overweight movie nerd Shawn C. Phillips, you just know a film is going to be terrible, but Bloody Mary 3D is so incredibly cheap and utterly trashy that it at least avoids the crime of being boring.

Ricci can't act to save her life but spends a lot of the film naked or mostly naked; also adding sex appeal is Alena Savostikova as aspiring actress Elle Bree (who sadly remains clothed throughout). Jeremy plays a harmonica (thankfully, he also remains clothed), Philips runs around with his shirt hanging out of his trousers, and the lousy music video for Elias's equally lousy song 'Ribcage' is played in its entirety (and repeated several times). There are a few murders, but gore-hounds shouldn't get excited: they're totally lame.

I'm probably being over-generous here, but I'm giving this one 4/10 for being so utterly craptabulous.

Standing in a dark room listening to white noise for 1hr 17m and 36 seconds IS more enjoyable.

[TwoBulletsLeft · 1/10 · 22 January 2015]

Now I actually "Like" a bad film. Some people would probably go so far to say I enjoy a REALLY terrible film. However from the opening "flabberghastingly" terrible opening scene (which leads to some of the most uninspired use of Modul8's transformer effect (seriously strap yourself in for the "music video" in around 15 minutes (or skip forwards that much))). However, https://www.facebook.com/bloodymary3d brings "movies" to an altogether new low. A zero.

I've no idea how this ever got past the stoned conversation stage. Maybe its based upon state dependent memory?

Acting? From the opening (terrible) lesbian scene, to the sterling performance from "Robert?" it looks like the entire cast took method acting lessons from Pinnoccio for six months prior to filming started.

The Motion template used for the opening credits is set perfectly to what can only be described as a low bitrate rendition of some post punk warble too.

Seriously, fifteen minutes in and the stunning use of Modul8 for "the music video" has simply taken my sense of wonder away.

I could go on ... However I'm not entirely sure I'd not go postal trying to get through the next hour and five minutes ....

Help?

This should be a horrorfilm?

[Ai-Fan · 1/10 · 13 November 2019]

The plot isn't scary at all.

Horrible is only the amateurish low quality of sound, acting, singing and picture. :-)

Amateurish urban tale with no substance

[Floated2 · 1/10 · 27 March 2024]

As reviews have pointed out, this film opens in the year 1904, as two women Mary Worth (Veronica Ricci) and a another woman get down to some steamy lengthy explicit scene. The scene quickly follows after them being interrupted by Mary's husband, who grabs a knife and punishes them for their sins. He wastes no time in doing so. And as this occurs, we get a sense to how low budget the kills and lack of effort shown will be.

Described as a horror film but it's too low budget and terribly acted that it's hard to take serious. The kills are and it's reactions are obvious here.

Most of the movie takes place at a music studio for a pop star filming a music video. There are a bunch of one dimensional characters coming along as each one end up getting killer (by silly looking stabs) by Mary. A lot of talking with no substance as the scenes are simply there to pass time.

There are no real thrills, no suspense and nothing exactly memorable happens. What is silly is how none of the characters weren't able to simply just kill or attack Mary. She would occasionally appear through the mirrors (urban tale of saying "Bloody Mary" three times) and randomly pop up, but once she is there, no one did anything to her. She simply had a knife. In the end it's simply a weak low budget film.

Soft core stabbings

[warehousereviews · 4/10 · 11 August 2021]

All stars given for Veronica Ricci.... that is all.

Not to be taken seriously

[capelladewdrop · 6/10 · 23 October 2015]

Well I enjoyed this movie even though it was a low budget thrill. I feel it was in the genre of horror comedy. I enjoy a horror with a strong female lead, this is what Bloody Mary delivered.

The characters in this movie were life-like and it didn't go over the top with drama like most other movies do. In fact there was no real sense of drama whatsoever. It had an almost sense of 'reality show' feel to it.

It contains music video and tracks, perhaps this movie is supposed to promote some little known pop/rock singer. Overall it would probably appeal to teenagers the most as there is a hot lesbian scene at the very start which causes most people who are afraid of the sight of sex or a naked female body to switch off then and then, and there's is a lot of sexism throughout such as groping of butts and the female characters wearing sexy outfits.

The apples are really green

[Kanzaki_ken · 6/10 · 6 September 2021]

I remember I've watched this movie, even though not entertaining much, somehow, I used to like this movie . Bloody Mary comes from the urban legend that when you chant her name at the mirror, her ghost comes alive. This is the film I don't know if I suggest to those horror fans , and Don't forget that tree outside the house.