Young Blade Runner K's discovery of a long-buried secret leads him to track down former Blade Runner Rick Deckard, who's been missing for thirty years.
Thirty years after the events of Blade Runner (1982), a new Blade Runner, L.A.P.D. Officer "K" (Ryan Gosling), unearths a long-buried secret that has the potential to plunge what's left of society into chaos. K's discovery leads him on a quest to find Rick Deckard (Harrison Ford), a former L.A.P.D. Blade Runner, who has been missing for thirty years.Written by
Warner Bros. Pictures
Italian censorship visa # 112509 was delivered on October 3, 2017. See more »
Goofs
About 101 minutes, K finds bees and beehives. There is no way bees could stay alive (much less flourish) in such a toxic environment. They are far too fragile regardless of what anyone may do. They must have plant life (specifically, flowering plants) to pollinate and make honey to survive. This is true despite speculation to the contrary. See more »
Quotes
[first lines]
'K':
I hope you don't mind me taking the liberty. I was careful not to drag in... any dirt.
See more »
Crazy Credits
Early in the closing credits amidst the distortion of the letters, Editor Joe Walker's first name initially for a very brief moment appears as "JOI". See more »
Alternate Versions
In India, the film had to be censored before it could receive an 'A' rating from the CBFC (Indian rating's board); these cuts removed all shots of nudity from the film; while it was pointed out that the nudity was in fact computer generated images rather than real footage the censors still objected to this and demanded cuts. The censors also demanded that all shots of liquor bottles in the film have their labels be blurred out. See more »
Boring script, dialogue and lines Typical sequel (a shadow of its prequel)
They really should become more judicious in picking which movies need a sequel and if they do that 90% of sequels will never come to be and the focus will shift towards developing new ideas.
321 of 555 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?
| Report this
Pros:
Beautiful to look at
Beautiful women
Cool technology
Cons:
Slow
Nothing is resolved
Boring script, dialogue and lines Typical sequel (a shadow of its prequel)
They really should become more judicious in picking which movies need a sequel and if they do that 90% of sequels will never come to be and the focus will shift towards developing new ideas.