Young Blade Runner K's discovery of a long-buried secret leads him to track down former Blade Runner Rick Deckard, who's been missing for thirty years.
Thirty years after the events of Blade Runner (1982), a new Blade Runner, L.A.P.D. Officer "K" (Ryan Gosling), unearths a long-buried secret that has the potential to plunge what's left of society into chaos. K's discovery leads him on a quest to find Rick Deckard (Harrison Ford), a former L.A.P.D. Blade Runner, who has been missing for thirty years.Written by
Warner Bros. Pictures
In a September 21, 2017 interview in the Dutch magazine "Algemeen Dagblad", Sylvia Hoeks explained her hair was dyed black to give her "an Asian appearance". Hoeks said, "I became the Japanese version of myself. My best friend and I even started to greet each other in Japanese." See more »
Goofs
(at around 1h 55 mins) When Deckard locks the door and runs to where his Spinner is parked, the position of his dog relative to him changes between shots. First, the dog is ahead of him when he locks the door, then behind him as Officer K bursts through the wall, then the dog vanishes when the Spinner explodes, only to reappear sliding across the ground from ahead of Deckard. See more »
Quotes
[first lines]
'K':
I hope you don't mind me taking the liberty. I was careful not to drag in... any dirt.
See more »
Crazy Credits
There are no opening credits, and the title proper is not shown until the ending credits. See more »
Alternate Versions
In India, the film had to be censored before it could receive an 'A' rating from the CBFC (Indian rating's board); these cuts removed all shots of nudity from the film; while it was pointed out that the nudity was in fact computer generated images rather than real footage the censors still objected to this and demanded cuts. The censors also demanded that all shots of liquor bottles in the film have their labels be blurred out. See more »
Boring script, dialogue and lines Typical sequel (a shadow of its prequel)
They really should become more judicious in picking which movies need a sequel and if they do that 90% of sequels will never come to be and the focus will shift towards developing new ideas.
390 of 720 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?
| Report this
Pros:
Beautiful to look at
Beautiful women
Cool technology
Cons:
Slow
Nothing is resolved
Boring script, dialogue and lines Typical sequel (a shadow of its prequel)
They really should become more judicious in picking which movies need a sequel and if they do that 90% of sequels will never come to be and the focus will shift towards developing new ideas.