Women in Love (2011– )
1 user 1 critic

Episode #1.2 

Adaptation of D.H. Lawrence classic novels The Rainbow and Women in Love focusing on the lives of two sisters, Ursula and Gudrun and their developing relationships with two friends Rupert ... See full summary »


Miranda Bowen


D.H. Lawrence (based on the novels "The Rainbow" and "Women in Love"), William Ivory


Add Image Add an image

Do you have any images for this title?



Episode cast overview, first billed only:
Joseph Mawle ... Gerald Crich
Rory Kinnear ... Rupert Birkin
Iain Winter Iain Winter ... Mr. Sutton
Chad Phillips ... Maurice
Rosamund Pike ... Gudrun Brangwen
Rachael Stirling ... Ursula Brangwen
Tinarie van Wyk Loots ... Samantha (as Tinarie Van Wyk Loots)
Olivia Grant ... Hermione Roddice
Tamia Visagie Tamia Visagie ... Winifred
Patrick Lyster ... Mr. Crich
Victoria Bartlett Victoria Bartlett ... Nurse
James Gracie ... Alexander Roddice (as James Alexander)
Michael Tompson Michael Tompson ... Servant At Shortlands
Daniel Kotzen Daniel Kotzen ... Boy with Gun
Grant Swanby ... Wolfgang Loerke


Adaptation of D.H. Lawrence classic novels The Rainbow and Women in Love focusing on the lives of two sisters, Ursula and Gudrun and their developing relationships with two friends Rupert Birkin and Gerald Crich in the aftermath of the WW1. Written by Anonymous

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis







Release Date:

31 March 2011 (UK) See more »

Company Credits

Show more on IMDbPro »

Technical Specs


Sound Mix:




Aspect Ratio:

1.78 : 1
See full technical specs »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

'Women in Love': Part 2
10 June 2018 | by TheLittleSongbirdSee all my reviews

As a standalone, this mini-series of 'Women in Love' (also mixed with 'The Rainbow') is a mixed bag with some things that are done very well. As an adaptation however, "purists" are most likely to find very little to like, in this respect the mini-series is poor. Always make a conscientious effort to judge adaptations on its own terms, but while 'Women in Love' (2011) is not terrible on its own and is nowhere near as unwatchable as the Amazon reviewers made it out to be it just felt rather bland and one of those rare cases where it is very difficult not to compare.

Ken Russell's 1969 film is just brilliant and is not to be missed if you haven't already. As an adaptation it is one of the best ever where it is very clear that Russell really understood the book and the meaning of all the storytelling and characterisation (especially in the infamous nude wrestling scene). It is also easily his best film, as well as one of his most restrained and coherent, devoid of any of the excesses that he would resort to later on, and contains a towering performance from Glenda Jackson and a career-best from Oliver Reed.

Lets start with the good things about the mini-series and this second part. The production values are very well-done, the scenery is just gorgeous and it's superbly shot. The music is understated without being one-note, repetitive or syrupy. There is some thoughtful and witty script-writing that does often stick to D.H. Lawrence's style relatively closely, while the storytelling does maintain some of the bleak and unpleasant nature of that in the book.

The cast mostly do a good job, granted they are nowhere near as good as the cast in the 1969 film but judged on their own while very different they don't do a bad job at all.

Particularly good in the second part (Saskia Reeves and Ben Daniels were wonderful too in the first part) is Rachel Stirling, Ursula is the heart of the story and Stirling is terrific and brings a lot of heart to the role. Rosamund Pike's interpretation of Gudrun is very different to Glenda Jackson's, softer, more cunning and more feminine, but those traits are interesting and handled well and Pike is well-suited to those traits.

Not all the performances work. Rory Kinnear for my tastes does play Birkin as too much of a wimp and could have brought out the character's charm and wit more, an out of step opinion it seems. Joseph Mawle has his moments, Gerald is one of those dangerous-under-the-surface characters that Mawle does sometimes bring out but most of the time he is so boorish and dull that the emotional intensity doesn't come over as well as it could have done. '

'Women in Love' (2011) suffers other problems too, the dialogue can get over-explanatory and some is cringe-worthy. The storytelling in the second part here becomes muddled and leaden with a lack of tension. Scenes felt bland, Gerald's death and the aftermath was heart-breaking before but here indifferently handled and downplayed and the Skrebensky scenes from 'The Rainbow' were pointless and just confused the drama rather than giving the story more dramatic purpose.

Characters are written well sometimes especially Ursula here (the parents also in the first half) but a lot of the time they do fail to be interesting, their development is mostly very sketchy and the interaction between them is often devoid of emotion and intensity, especially that of Gerald and Gudrun, that Mawle isn't believable doesn't help matters.

Overall, has some things to admire, especially the production values and most of the cast, and not bad on its own but on the most part it was rather bland and pales in comparison to the film version. 5/10 Bethany Cox

1 of 1 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you? | Report this
Review this title | See one user review »

Contribute to This Page

Stream Trending Movies With Prime Video

Enjoy a night in with these popular movies available to stream now with Prime Video.

Start your free trial

Recently Viewed