5.5/10
17,452
89 user 148 critic

Diana (2013)

Trailer
2:30 | Trailer

Watch for Free

on IMDb Freedive

ALL
During the last two years of her life, Princess Diana embarks on a final rite of passage: a secret love affair with Pakistani heart surgeon Hasnat Khan.

Writers:

Stephen Jeffreys, Kate Snell (inspired by the book 'Diana Her Last Love' by)
1 nomination. See more awards »

Videos

Photos

Edit

Cast

Cast overview, first billed only:
Naomi Watts ... Diana
Cas Anvar ... Dodi Fayed
Charles Edwards ... Patrick Jephson
James Puddephatt James Puddephatt ... Security Guard 1
Douglas Hodge ... Paul Burrell
Ilan Goodman ... Diana Assistant 1
Geraldine James ... Oonagh Shanley-Toffolo
Prasanna Puwanarajah ... Martin Bashir
Rose O'Loughlin Rose O'Loughlin ... Nurse Denise
Michael Hadley Michael Hadley ... Joseph Toffollo
Naveen Andrews ... Hasnat Khan
Juliet Stevenson ... Sonia
Max Wrottesley ... News of the World Photographer
Christopher Birch Christopher Birch ... Ronnie Scott
Nathaniel Facey Nathaniel Facey ... Dwayne Johnson
Edit

Storyline

During the last two years of her life, Princess Diana embarks on a final rite of passage: a secret love affair with Pakistani heart surgeon Hasnat Khan.

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis

Taglines:

The legend is never the whole story See more »


Motion Picture Rating (MPAA)

Rated PG-13 for brief strong language, some sensuality and smoking | See all certifications »

Parents Guide:

View content advisory »
Edit

Details

Official Sites:

Official site [Japan]

Country:

UK | France | Sweden | Belgium

Language:

English

Release Date:

20 September 2013 (UK) See more »

Also Known As:

Caught in Flight See more »

Filming Locations:

London, England, UK See more »

Edit

Box Office

Budget:

$15,000,000 (estimated)

Opening Weekend:

£623,051 (United Kingdom), 22 September 2013, Limited Release

Opening Weekend USA:

$67,754, 3 November 2013, Limited Release

Gross USA:

$331,634, 22 November 2013
See more on IMDbPro »

Company Credits

Show more on IMDbPro »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Sound Mix:

Dolby Digital | Auro 11.1

Color:

Color

Aspect Ratio:

1.85 : 1
See full technical specs »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

Jessica Chastain was originally cast as Princess Diana. She dropped out due to scheduling conflicts. See more »

Goofs

There's a website address outside a restaurant even though the Internet was not popular in 1995. See more »

Quotes

[first lines]
Reporter: It is not the horror of landmines that is making the headlines back home, but reports of the Princess's romance with Dodi Fayed. Speculation fueled by the arrival last night of a car similar to that owned by the Princess.
See more »

Connections

Referenced in Showreel: Another One Bites the Dust (2013) See more »

Soundtracks

Tanya
Written by Donald Byrd
Performed by Dexter Gordon
See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
Not one of the year's worst, but one of the year's most disappointing- Diana deserved much better
17 April 2014 | by TheLittleSongbirdSee all my reviews

This did have the potential to be good. The subject matter was an interesting one, Naomi Watts is a very good actress, Naveen Andrews was great on LOST and while Downfall needs a re-watch I seem to remember that it did show a director with some talent in Oliver Hirschbiegel. Despite this potential, personally Diana was disappointing, and not just as a biopic or a story based on Diana's life but as a film in general. In fact you don't even need to know much about Diana or the Royal Family to see how much Diana fails outside of historical value. The lovely scenery and interiors(Diana's fashions are nice too), Naveen Andrews' appealing performance- though in an underwritten and not very likable role- and the moving ending did save the film somewhat, other than that Diana for me didn't work. Naomi Watts does a valiant job in the difficult title role and gets the mannerisms down pat and has charisma, but her performance did seem mannerisms-heavy and I never felt that Watts quite disappeared into the role. It's not her fault though as she doesn't have much material of note to work with. Diana as a character is very underwritten and also comes across as doe-eyed and shallow, in fact none of the characters are written well at all which was why other talented actors like Douglas Hodge, Geraldine James and Juliet Stevenson(Stevenson's sincere performance was the most memorable of the supporting cast) were criminally underused. The story was an interesting subject, on film though it never engages. Iconic scenes are there but are little more than "slide shows" compared to everything else, and some like Diana's controversial interview came across as one-sided and skimmed over.

That was the effect a lot of the film had, it is dominated by the romance of Diana and Hasnat while Diana's family other than in some iconic moments the film captures or in reference we learn little of, Dodi Fayad is introduced far too late and the Royal Family are almost completely side lined. Worse, the romance is not written well at all, despite the commendable efforts of the two leads you have a hard time investing emotionally in either Diana or Hasnat. The storytelling on the most part is too skimmed over with no real substance, has too many scenes that have little or no meaning or relevance, is often repetitive especially the falling into bed even after an argument, and parts are paced tediously. As clumsy some of the exposition is, the worst of the dialogue is in the romance, the first half of Diana is incredibly awkward in its writing, the sort you'd hear on a first date when you don't know what to say with the pauses and all. It gets a tad better in the second half but is still stilted and half-baked. In short, the writing in Diana in personal opinion was dire. Hirschbiegel's directing is little improvement either, very little flair and the scenes focused on the romance are given little sympathy or momentum. No matter how good the scenery and interiors are they are not matched by the photography which was reminiscent of a Lifetime movie, think of 2011's William and Kate except not quite as badly edited or shot. Some shots had a dizzying effect and others a pedestrian effect or in artsy style(a style that I have no negative bias at all towards, quite the contrary) that looked very out of place within the film. The music was at best forgettable, which was the feeling Diana as a film overall had. In conclusion, not a complete disaster but very disappointing. It tried to be careful not to offend but instead it was awkwardly written, underdeveloped and dull as a result, and actually to me how Diana was written would be insulting to many people. 3/10 Bethany Cox


3 of 3 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you? | Report this
Review this title | See all 89 user reviews »

Contribute to This Page

Check Out What's Playing on IMDb Freedive

See what movies and TV series you can watch for free today, and visit IMDb Freedive for even more. Select any poster below to play the movie!

Find more things to watch



Recently Viewed