6.4/10
450
4 user 11 critic

The Floating Castle (2012)

Nobô no shiro (original title)
In the year 1590, powerful daimyo Toyotomi Hideyoshi nears his plan to unify all of Japan, but he comes across a floating fortress known as Oshi Castle. Narita Nagachika must use his army to defend the castle.

Writers:

Ryô Wada (based on the novel by), Ryô Wada (screenplay)
Reviews
1 win & 14 nominations. See more awards »

Photos

Add Image Add an image

Do you have any images for this title?

Edit

Cast

Credited cast:
Takehiro Hira ... Masaie natsuka
Takayuki Yamada
Mana Ashida ... Chidori
Hiroki Narimiya ... Yukie Sakamaki
Kôichi Satô
Honami Suzuki Honami Suzuki
Machiko Ono ... Chiyo
Isao Natsuyagi
Nana Eikura ... Kaihime
Masachika Ichimura ... Hideyoshi toyotomi
Akiyoshi Nakao
Mansai Nomura ... Nagachika narita
Sei Hiraizumi Sei Hiraizumi
Masahiko Nishimura
Sôkô Wada
Edit

Storyline

In the year 1590, powerful daimyo Toyotomi Hideyoshi nears his plan to unify all of Japan, but he comes across a floating fortress known as Oshi Castle. Narita Nagachika must use his army to defend the castle.

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis

Genres:

Comedy | Drama | History

Certificate:

See all certifications »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

When the dykes are being constructed broken clay pottery figures can be seen intermingled with the clay. These clay pottery figures (haniwa) were probably from a kofun-tomb that had been demolished to help build the dyke. This area is famous for its kofun-tombs some of which still survive and can be visited nowadays by tourists. See more »

Goofs

Since this movie takes place in 1590 during the Siege of Oshi, Otani Yoshitsugu should have covered his face with a mask, as he's been nicknamed "The White Face" due to his contraction with leprosy. See more »

User Reviews

 
Far from the best, but can be enjoyable for the more open-minded
5 June 2013 | by floppydisk909See all my reviews

The Floating Castle isn't the worst I've seen, but its pretty far from the best. First thing to note, however, is that this is most definitely NOT a realistic historic drama, despite what the trailer and description seem say. The best example of this is a particular scene where one character lifts an enemy bodily from the ground on the tip of his spear. With one hand. On horse back. So yes, don't expect too much realism here.

It's strongest point is probably its colorful cast of characters. The team defending the castle consists of a good hearted buffoon, a reasonable older leader, a blood-thirsty warrior,a young strategist, and finally, a warrior princess that doubles as the love interest. It's a good mix, and pitted against the ambitious young general, the story sure sets itself up for a fun, adventurous tale. Unfortunately, it doesn't go much further than that. The right ingredients are there, but the final mix is particularly lacking.

I would say that the biggest problem lies in the movie's tone. It doesn't seem to have decided on whether or not it wants to be a light-hearted comedy or a serious action film, and trapezes back and forth between both extremes. Don't get me wrong, comedy action is a perfectly acceptable genre. But there has to be transitions. There are several jarring scenes where the entire cast is serious and somber, and literally, in the span of a single second, everyone on screen is suddenly doubled over in laughter.

One of the biggest complaints I've heard of from viewers is the CG. However, keep in mind that judging whether or not CG is good or bad really depends on what you compare it to. By Hollywood standards, yes, the CG is quite atrocious. By lower- budget Asian Cinema standards, the CG is acceptable, maybe even slightly above average. There are some scenes that stand out in particular and really throw you off, but I have seen far, far worse in non-Hollywood films.

The other big complaint I've heard of is the "lead" character, Narita Nagachika, or Lord Bone. The character is supposed to be a buffoon, and the actor seems to play him in a very over-exaggerated, slap-stick sort of manner. Another review describes him as Chaplin-esque, which I think is accurate. Although it might work in a different sort of movie, it stands out quite a bit here and seems overdone. Context might be helpful though, since a quick Google search reveals that the actor, Nomura Mansai, is a well-known Kyogen actor in Japan (Kyogen being a type of traditional Japanese comedy related to Noh theater). If Nomura's exaggerated, comedic acting is a direct result of his background, I'd say he was a bit...miscast. But whether or not it's the actor's or director's fault, Lord Bone's character definitely sticks out like sore thumb in the movie. I can see what they were trying to go for though, so I'd give them some points for trying.

Final recommendation? Only watch if you're of the more tolerant type and genuinely interested in the story. Many might say its a bad movie, but if you don't mind the CG or some of the more unique decisions made by the director, it can be enjoyable and fun. Just don't go in expecting too much.


6 of 6 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you? | Report this
Review this title | See all 4 user reviews »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.
Edit

Details

Official Sites:

Official site [Japan]

Country:

Japan

Language:

Japanese

Release Date:

2 November 2012 (Japan) See more »

Also Known As:

The Floating Castle See more »

Filming Locations:

Saitama, Japan

Edit

Box Office

Cumulative Worldwide Gross:

$31,967,471
See more on IMDbPro »

Company Credits

Show more on IMDbPro »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Sound Mix:

Dolby Digital

Color:

Color

Aspect Ratio:

2.35 : 1
See full technical specs »

Contribute to This Page



Recently Viewed