Thirty-seven year old Mavis Gary seems incapable of happiness. She has had one failed marriage with no romance in her immediate horizon. She ghosts writes a young adult series of books, which has just been canceled due to low sales. She is in the process of writing the last book, with which she is having a mental block. She lives vicariously through Kendall Strickland, the teenaged female heroine in her books, as like Kendall she believes her high school years were the best years of her life when she was the prom queen. When she receives news that her high school beau, Buddy Slade, and his wife, Beth Slade, have just had their first child, Mavis takes it as a sign that she and Buddy are meant to be together. As such, she devises a false pretense to travel from her Minneapolis home back her her old hometown of Mercury, Minnesota to reclaim Buddy from Beth. As Mavis slyly or not so slyly does whatever she can to hang out with Buddy, even in Beth's company if need be, she also runs into ...Written by
I have a new rule. If Diablo Cody has anything to do with a movie, I don't see it.
I had a hint of her grating lack of depth when I watched the cut scenes from Juno. I thought Juno was passable but mostly for the performances. The DVD extras actually made me like it less and I only started with cool.
Ultimately, I found myself asking what the point was. If I'm going to watch a slow-paced drama/comedy I want to either laugh a fair amount or come away with an interesting idea. The movie was neither funny (I started to be amused by the guy in the theater who started heckling it, however) nor did it have any depth.
The point seemed to ultimately celebrate the demise of one of the beautiful people who many love to hate in high school-- as young adults. It seems born from the loathing one might feel when they run into the people who were popular in high school and still seem to believe somehow that their status remains intact-- the people who ride out their lucky hand for as long as they can while not realizing that they are stunted. But why celebrate? Worse, why celebrate while pretending to stand on higher ground? The movie is a very watery and even bitter stew. There was an attempt to sweeten it up with a tender storyline about a (fellow) loser who was actually physically hurt by a gang of the beautiful people. The character was contrived from empty platitudes and generalizations and accordingly wound up being flat and lifeless.
I often wonder if people feel a sense of duty when they say they like movies like this. It's like pretending to really like the food at a dinner party when the food is ambitious but ultimately boring.
36 of 65 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?
| Report this