111 reviews
Surely my review would annoy those who liked it. But the majority of who saw it was felt just like me. It has been 20 years since the first 3D animated feature film came. Not all the films released in this period were great. Some were technically sounded good and some were stories. If you had seen 'Hoodwinked!', you would know how awesome that story was, despite the poor animation production. But this film failed in all the department.
I recently finished watching the first season of 'Trollhunters' and 'Miraculous Ladybug'. Even the television made products were much better than this film. Small budget, small production house et cetera is not an excuse. Thankfully, this is not the only bad animated feature I've seen so far in my life, but sadly it joins the list of those titles.
Maybe! The little kids could enjoy it, who does not know to differentiate between good and bad. But for the adults, this is definitely skippable film. The best thing about this film was the message it carried, though, even for an animated film and a fantasy film, not convincing enough. It was kind of very similar to 'Delhi Safari'. In some perspective, I thought it was a remake of that. There are lots of other films similar to this like 'Chole & Theo', 'Happy Feet' and so on that you can try them instead.
2/10
I recently finished watching the first season of 'Trollhunters' and 'Miraculous Ladybug'. Even the television made products were much better than this film. Small budget, small production house et cetera is not an excuse. Thankfully, this is not the only bad animated feature I've seen so far in my life, but sadly it joins the list of those titles.
Maybe! The little kids could enjoy it, who does not know to differentiate between good and bad. But for the adults, this is definitely skippable film. The best thing about this film was the message it carried, though, even for an animated film and a fantasy film, not convincing enough. It was kind of very similar to 'Delhi Safari'. In some perspective, I thought it was a remake of that. There are lots of other films similar to this like 'Chole & Theo', 'Happy Feet' and so on that you can try them instead.
2/10
- Reno-Rangan
- Jun 23, 2017
- Permalink
Very entertaining. Contains huge plot holes, lots of unfunny humor, useless characters, ... everything about it is wrong, except maybe for one joke. So while the movie is very badly made, at least it's not boring, so you get some entertainment out of it. Give it as a prank gift maybe, but if your children are over ten years old and you expect them to take it seriously it might not work out so well.
- randomstickman
- Jun 11, 2017
- Permalink
Norm of the North is painfully bad, with stilted dialogue and a palpable sense throughout that the writers were struggling to fill up 90 minutes. It seems to operate on the premise that animation, cute madcap antics by furry animals and an inspiration-ish story line are enough to make a good movie. The product is the very definition of "mailing it in", and by the end I felt that the producer must have had actual contempt for the viewers. Awful.
- alan-c-edwards
- Mar 9, 2017
- Permalink
Good lord.... god almighty.
Words cannot describe this heinous disaster that Lionsgate have given us.
I can't imagine what the producers were even thinking.
Were they laughing in our faces when they sneaked it into the theatres?
Or were they crying in shame at what they had just made?
Chances are it's the first answer.
I just can't explain how bad this so called "animated comedy" is.
First of all, there is no comedy.
No gags.
No jokes.
No nothing.
Just a bunch of miserable unfunny things going on that the writers call "funny". Not even Tommy Cooper would be laughing at anything this film has to offer.
Then there isn't a plot to be found.
Well actually I lied, there is a plot somewhere. But once you dig deep into the surface like Nicolas Cage going insane over a decades old bike, you'll find it's a plot you've seen before. (Case in point Madagascar, one of the films you should instead watch)
There isn't any animation here either.
Well again there is but it's straight to DVD quality. Everyone moves jerky, the art style feels lame, the colour palate is typical. This "thing" certainly won't be giving any other straight to DVD animated films nightmares anytime soon.
There isn't any characters, just walking dead lifeless fossils doing things. And nearly all of them are annoying as the heavens above.
No voices too. What we got is constant shouting, yelling and pain from these actors.
Rob Schenider should know better than to keep putting his name on stuff like this. Ken Jeong is as grating as he's ever been and I didn't give two craps about anyone else.
And how dare they waste Bill Nighy too?
Charlie Adler, Jess Harnell and a couple other well-known voice-actors are there too but even this film isn't one of their finest hours.
Hold on, why did I just call it a film?
It isn't one.
It's a humorous black hole that'll suck the life out of you and your family if you dare watch it.
It's the antichrist of animation, a disaster so unbearable, you'll might even die of horror watching the bloody thing.
And the fact it's produced by the same person who did Superted (Mike Young) just terrifies me to almost no end.
Just how did he put his name onto this?
Just how?
Even the voice directing feels non-existent and when it's got Buster Bunny (Charlie Adler) and Oshawott (Lisa Ortiz) trying their best yet it still isn't there, you deserve all the scorn your film gets.
I hope you're happy Splash Entertainment and Lionsgate.
I really hope you are.
Words cannot describe this heinous disaster that Lionsgate have given us.
I can't imagine what the producers were even thinking.
Were they laughing in our faces when they sneaked it into the theatres?
Or were they crying in shame at what they had just made?
Chances are it's the first answer.
I just can't explain how bad this so called "animated comedy" is.
First of all, there is no comedy.
No gags.
No jokes.
No nothing.
Just a bunch of miserable unfunny things going on that the writers call "funny". Not even Tommy Cooper would be laughing at anything this film has to offer.
Then there isn't a plot to be found.
Well actually I lied, there is a plot somewhere. But once you dig deep into the surface like Nicolas Cage going insane over a decades old bike, you'll find it's a plot you've seen before. (Case in point Madagascar, one of the films you should instead watch)
There isn't any animation here either.
Well again there is but it's straight to DVD quality. Everyone moves jerky, the art style feels lame, the colour palate is typical. This "thing" certainly won't be giving any other straight to DVD animated films nightmares anytime soon.
There isn't any characters, just walking dead lifeless fossils doing things. And nearly all of them are annoying as the heavens above.
No voices too. What we got is constant shouting, yelling and pain from these actors.
Rob Schenider should know better than to keep putting his name on stuff like this. Ken Jeong is as grating as he's ever been and I didn't give two craps about anyone else.
And how dare they waste Bill Nighy too?
Charlie Adler, Jess Harnell and a couple other well-known voice-actors are there too but even this film isn't one of their finest hours.
Hold on, why did I just call it a film?
It isn't one.
It's a humorous black hole that'll suck the life out of you and your family if you dare watch it.
It's the antichrist of animation, a disaster so unbearable, you'll might even die of horror watching the bloody thing.
And the fact it's produced by the same person who did Superted (Mike Young) just terrifies me to almost no end.
Just how did he put his name onto this?
Just how?
Even the voice directing feels non-existent and when it's got Buster Bunny (Charlie Adler) and Oshawott (Lisa Ortiz) trying their best yet it still isn't there, you deserve all the scorn your film gets.
I hope you're happy Splash Entertainment and Lionsgate.
I really hope you are.
- dmartinez-52655
- Feb 26, 2017
- Permalink
- biggahoolefan
- Nov 25, 2016
- Permalink
- shormel-87266
- Jun 17, 2017
- Permalink
I have seen some stuff over the years but this one has got to be the most cheap sluggish tastless ugly stupid annoying silly peace of crap I have ever seen on a screen in my entire life. The kind of people who make these kind if things... I dont even know. I am so upset and sad.
Norm (Rob Schneider) the polar bear doesn't know how to hunt, but he does possess the unique ability to talk to humans. When the wealthy Mr. Greene (Ken Jeong) unveils his idea to build luxury condos in the Arctic, Norm realizes that his beloved home is in jeopardy. Accompanied by three mischievous lemmings, Norm stows away on a ship to New York. Once there, he meets a surprising ally (Maya Kay) who helps him hatch a scheme to sabotage the shady developer's plans.
Norm of the North is truly an excellent movie you should not miss.It will undoubtedly please the majority of audience because it is impressively funny from the beginning till the end.
Norm of the North is truly an excellent movie you should not miss.It will undoubtedly please the majority of audience because it is impressively funny from the beginning till the end.
- touristica-83924
- Jan 27, 2016
- Permalink
- kirbylee70-599-526179
- May 8, 2016
- Permalink
Why? WHY?? WHY??? What was LionsGate thinking?? Clearly they were high when they thought of making this film. I'm not kidding, the movie is notorious! It even got a 2/10 review!! Norm, the main character, tries to protect his homeland. The arctic. But Norm...BOY There's SO MANY LEVELS OF WRONG WHEN IT COMES TO HIM. Like the number 1 problem that makes me cringe is his dance. He twerks. O_O. Speechless. ABSOLUTE SPEECHLESS! There's a scene where he has a mp3 player and FREAKING SHAKES HIS BUTT IN FRONT OF THE SCREEN!!! NO ONE WANTS TO SEE THAT!!! HE CALLS IT, THE FREAKING "ARTIC SHAKE!!! HE ALSO TWERKED IN ONCE SCENE WERE NORM WAS DANCING IN FRONT OF THESE ANIMALS!!! Clearly LionsGate was high when they made those scenes. Some people like his butt shake, but I digress. THIS IS THE WORST MOVIE EVER MADE BY MAN KIND!!!!!
- martinezr-11775
- Jul 8, 2017
- Permalink
"Norm of the North" to me looked like a nice, fun family movie, but when I watched it, it was full of total garbage. If I had to, I wouldn't even give it a rating. It was so bad. The lemmings (rip-offs of minions) are so annoying, they pee everywhere and are very disgusting. The movie was poorly animated and very boring. This movie has some gay jokes, which aren't appropriate for a pg film.
- marshmallowslayer
- Jun 9, 2017
- Permalink
'Norm of the North' is not quite the worst animated film ever, and there are worse films overall out there as well. This is saying little, because 'Norm of the North' is down there as one of the worst animated films in existence and it's a disgrace to animation, it's that bad.
From the looks of the undeservedly high number of useful votes for the mostly poorly written (since when are plot summaries, repetition and hardly any reasoning enough to warrant one useful vote, let alone 100+) and useless positive user reviews, which have been proved to be fraudulent and most likely the work of one person or a small group of people using multiple accounts, this is not going to be a popular review despite being an honest and hopefully constructively critical one. This is not being ignorant, they have been violating, or at least close to doing so, IMDb's Terms and Conditions for two and a half years now, and it is disgusting that they are contributing towards destroying the credibility of a good site and it has been proved that deleting of reviews or de-authenticating/deleting their accounts is not enough to stop them doing it again and escalating, which is what has happened. If there are people who genuinely like/dislike a film that's fine by me, as long as the reviews are worth reading which means summing up strengths and faults thoughtfully and maturely without resorting to insults, inventing conspiracy theories or taking the "I'm right, you're wrong" attitude, which for some films IMDb reviews are solely lacking in at the moment.
Back to 'Norm of the North' and summing up all that's wrong with it, it is very poorly animated and wouldn't even pass muster quality-wise for CGI animation ten plus years ago. The colours are flat, the backgrounds are sparse in detail and lack fluidity and the character designs especially the titular character are ugly in design and stiff in movement. There is nothing memorable in the music, and it's intrusive, often annoying and doesn't fit the scene. 'Norm of the Norm' fares even worse in the writing department.
There is not a single good line of dialogue, joke or gag. The dialogue completely lacks wit and has no natural flow or rhythm, constantly sounding disjointed. The jokes are very forced and limply timed, with a complete lack of originality and maturity. Similarly the gags are childish and unfunny with unimaginative visuals. If one has to pick the worst asset to 'Norm of the North' it is the story which is a complete shambles. There is a distinct lack of charm, fun or heart, everything just reeks of cheap, it's paced erratically with a leaden pace and a jumpy structure. With the jumpy story structure coupled with parts feeling incomplete and a very confused tone that borders on the heavy-handed, the story is not always easy to follow, and is often incoherent even. Target audience is a real issue, children will find it too complicated, adults will find it stupid and simplistic and with little of interest. The message is a good one and is well-intended but badly ruined by being delivered with the subtlety of a sledgehammer. The dance sequences are random, out of place and scream of incompleteness.
Some have said the characters have some likability. Not to me, to me their personalities were not engaging or in depth (wasn't expecting complexity or three-dimensionality, but was expecting to be able to care for the characters) enough and some grated on the nerves actually. Some have also said about the lemmings being scene stealers, with comparisons to the Minions from the 'Despicable Me' franchise or the penguins from the 'Madagascar' franchise. For me though, those characters were much funnier, cuter and more charming, the lemmings were pretty bland and irritated more than amused. The voice actors across the board fail to bring much passion or fun to their characters, with a lot of going through the motions and over-compensating.
In summary, awful and a disgrace to animation. 1/10 (a rating that this reviewer has not given out since February). Bethany Cox
From the looks of the undeservedly high number of useful votes for the mostly poorly written (since when are plot summaries, repetition and hardly any reasoning enough to warrant one useful vote, let alone 100+) and useless positive user reviews, which have been proved to be fraudulent and most likely the work of one person or a small group of people using multiple accounts, this is not going to be a popular review despite being an honest and hopefully constructively critical one. This is not being ignorant, they have been violating, or at least close to doing so, IMDb's Terms and Conditions for two and a half years now, and it is disgusting that they are contributing towards destroying the credibility of a good site and it has been proved that deleting of reviews or de-authenticating/deleting their accounts is not enough to stop them doing it again and escalating, which is what has happened. If there are people who genuinely like/dislike a film that's fine by me, as long as the reviews are worth reading which means summing up strengths and faults thoughtfully and maturely without resorting to insults, inventing conspiracy theories or taking the "I'm right, you're wrong" attitude, which for some films IMDb reviews are solely lacking in at the moment.
Back to 'Norm of the North' and summing up all that's wrong with it, it is very poorly animated and wouldn't even pass muster quality-wise for CGI animation ten plus years ago. The colours are flat, the backgrounds are sparse in detail and lack fluidity and the character designs especially the titular character are ugly in design and stiff in movement. There is nothing memorable in the music, and it's intrusive, often annoying and doesn't fit the scene. 'Norm of the Norm' fares even worse in the writing department.
There is not a single good line of dialogue, joke or gag. The dialogue completely lacks wit and has no natural flow or rhythm, constantly sounding disjointed. The jokes are very forced and limply timed, with a complete lack of originality and maturity. Similarly the gags are childish and unfunny with unimaginative visuals. If one has to pick the worst asset to 'Norm of the North' it is the story which is a complete shambles. There is a distinct lack of charm, fun or heart, everything just reeks of cheap, it's paced erratically with a leaden pace and a jumpy structure. With the jumpy story structure coupled with parts feeling incomplete and a very confused tone that borders on the heavy-handed, the story is not always easy to follow, and is often incoherent even. Target audience is a real issue, children will find it too complicated, adults will find it stupid and simplistic and with little of interest. The message is a good one and is well-intended but badly ruined by being delivered with the subtlety of a sledgehammer. The dance sequences are random, out of place and scream of incompleteness.
Some have said the characters have some likability. Not to me, to me their personalities were not engaging or in depth (wasn't expecting complexity or three-dimensionality, but was expecting to be able to care for the characters) enough and some grated on the nerves actually. Some have also said about the lemmings being scene stealers, with comparisons to the Minions from the 'Despicable Me' franchise or the penguins from the 'Madagascar' franchise. For me though, those characters were much funnier, cuter and more charming, the lemmings were pretty bland and irritated more than amused. The voice actors across the board fail to bring much passion or fun to their characters, with a lot of going through the motions and over-compensating.
In summary, awful and a disgrace to animation. 1/10 (a rating that this reviewer has not given out since February). Bethany Cox
- TheLittleSongbird
- Jun 4, 2016
- Permalink
Garbage. Trash. Abysmal. Pointless, directionless, painful, disappointing, tasteless, meaningless, meandering, gag-me-with-a-spoon, terrible beyond compare, slide me down a razor blade into a vat of iodine instead of making me watch this tripe again, just plain old "Bad".
Nope. Can't find it. Can't find the word or phrase.
I have been burgled of 40 minutes (that's all I could tolerate before I covertly left the room to register for IMDb solely to write this review) and I would like it back. I would go through my divorce again if it meant I didn't have to watch a minute of this crap ever... ever again.
*sob* It's really that bad, folks. A bunch of drunk kids throwing darts at the old plot board made this sucker a painful reality. Random, totally random.
I love animated films... having kids gave me a happy excuse to watch them all again and to live through the new ones in their company. But this drags the whole genre down to... to... well, the bottom. Of a really, really, deep hole.
Nope. Didn't like it. I feel bad for the people that wrote positive reviews and have to live with that shame every day. Shame on you all.
Have fun... with anything else. :-)
Nope. Can't find it. Can't find the word or phrase.
I have been burgled of 40 minutes (that's all I could tolerate before I covertly left the room to register for IMDb solely to write this review) and I would like it back. I would go through my divorce again if it meant I didn't have to watch a minute of this crap ever... ever again.
*sob* It's really that bad, folks. A bunch of drunk kids throwing darts at the old plot board made this sucker a painful reality. Random, totally random.
I love animated films... having kids gave me a happy excuse to watch them all again and to live through the new ones in their company. But this drags the whole genre down to... to... well, the bottom. Of a really, really, deep hole.
Nope. Didn't like it. I feel bad for the people that wrote positive reviews and have to live with that shame every day. Shame on you all.
Have fun... with anything else. :-)
- djlthomson-47448
- Jul 7, 2016
- Permalink
'NORM OF THE NORTH': Two and a Half Stars (Out of Five)
Animated kids' movie, about a talking polar bear, named Norm, on a mission to save his home from a ruthless rich developer. The film stars Rob Schneider, as the voice of Norm; and it costars Heather Graham, Ken Jeong, Colm Meaney and Bill Nighy. It was directed by first time feature filmmaker Trevor Wall (who's had a lot of experience directing kids' animated TV shows); and it was written by Daniel R Altiere, Steven M. Altiere (two veteran TV kids' film writers), Malcolm T. Goldman (a first time film writer) and Jamie Lissow (who also co- wrote the TV comedy series 'REAL ROB', with Schneider; who also starred in it). The movie received really bad reviews from critics, but it was mildly enjoyed by audiences. I'm somewhere in the middle.
Norm (Schneider) is a unique polar bear, in that he can talk to humans (and dance). He's not good at hunting though, and he doesn't fit in with the other bears. Norm loves his home still, despite this. So when he finds out that a greedy rich developer, named Mr. Greene (Jeong), is planning on building luxury houses in the Arctic, Norm travels to New York City to stop him. Three lemmings help him on his mission, as well as a compassionate employee of Mr. Greene's (Graham).
The film isn't exactly funny, or charming, but it doesn't feel overly stupid, or boring, either. The characters are likable, and there's also a really positive message, about defending the environment from big business. I think most kids will probably enjoy it as well. I've definitely wasted my time watching much worse kids' movies than this.
Watch our movie review show 'MOVIE TALK' at: https://youtu.be/_3w7EWxV5vg
Animated kids' movie, about a talking polar bear, named Norm, on a mission to save his home from a ruthless rich developer. The film stars Rob Schneider, as the voice of Norm; and it costars Heather Graham, Ken Jeong, Colm Meaney and Bill Nighy. It was directed by first time feature filmmaker Trevor Wall (who's had a lot of experience directing kids' animated TV shows); and it was written by Daniel R Altiere, Steven M. Altiere (two veteran TV kids' film writers), Malcolm T. Goldman (a first time film writer) and Jamie Lissow (who also co- wrote the TV comedy series 'REAL ROB', with Schneider; who also starred in it). The movie received really bad reviews from critics, but it was mildly enjoyed by audiences. I'm somewhere in the middle.
Norm (Schneider) is a unique polar bear, in that he can talk to humans (and dance). He's not good at hunting though, and he doesn't fit in with the other bears. Norm loves his home still, despite this. So when he finds out that a greedy rich developer, named Mr. Greene (Jeong), is planning on building luxury houses in the Arctic, Norm travels to New York City to stop him. Three lemmings help him on his mission, as well as a compassionate employee of Mr. Greene's (Graham).
The film isn't exactly funny, or charming, but it doesn't feel overly stupid, or boring, either. The characters are likable, and there's also a really positive message, about defending the environment from big business. I think most kids will probably enjoy it as well. I've definitely wasted my time watching much worse kids' movies than this.
Watch our movie review show 'MOVIE TALK' at: https://youtu.be/_3w7EWxV5vg
This film does NOT deserve a 10/10 rating! If you genuinely liked the film, that's fine. But come on! It doesn't deserve the highest possible rating just to balance out all the very negative reviews!
This film's plot is ridiculous---even if it's not meant to be taken that seriously. The animation works for a TV show on Nickelodeon or something, not a film released in theatres! The characters aren't interesting and just flat out dumb. The jokes aren't funny. The acting is nothing special.
Pretty much everything fails in this film. The reason why I gave this movie a 3 and not 1 is because there were some very few clever things about it and an okay message, but the way it was played out was definitely not that good.
If you like this movie, go ahead! But like I said, 10/10 is simply too much to give this film.
Overall 3/10
This film's plot is ridiculous---even if it's not meant to be taken that seriously. The animation works for a TV show on Nickelodeon or something, not a film released in theatres! The characters aren't interesting and just flat out dumb. The jokes aren't funny. The acting is nothing special.
Pretty much everything fails in this film. The reason why I gave this movie a 3 and not 1 is because there were some very few clever things about it and an okay message, but the way it was played out was definitely not that good.
If you like this movie, go ahead! But like I said, 10/10 is simply too much to give this film.
Overall 3/10
- madisondeclare
- Jun 13, 2016
- Permalink
The only thing good about this movie is that it tells people not to harm the environment. I like that message. You wouldn't force a Polar Bear to leave its own home. But there are three reasons why this is bad. 1. The animation looks like it's from a mid-2000s Pixar short film. 2. The toilet humor isn't funny. 3. The plot is BO-RING! BO-RING! I think this was a box office bomb.
- gavinwrivera
- Sep 15, 2017
- Permalink
"Norm Of The North" is an outstanding film for both children and adults.
It is a 3D Comedy- Adventure Movie.
I loved the plot of the movie about a cute,brainy and gentle bear called North.This bear peacefully asks for his rights in an incredibly funny and smart way.He talks to people too with a sense of humour.
The film is appealing to kids, teens and adults who would definitely enjoy watching this incredible film if they are stressed or sad.
90% real comedy,70% Adventure,100% Good Theme & Great Acting.
Off course Director Trevor Wall is a genius and all the producers did a great job because nobody in the cinema was bored.
It is a 3D Comedy- Adventure Movie.
I loved the plot of the movie about a cute,brainy and gentle bear called North.This bear peacefully asks for his rights in an incredibly funny and smart way.He talks to people too with a sense of humour.
The film is appealing to kids, teens and adults who would definitely enjoy watching this incredible film if they are stressed or sad.
90% real comedy,70% Adventure,100% Good Theme & Great Acting.
Off course Director Trevor Wall is a genius and all the producers did a great job because nobody in the cinema was bored.
- river-94557
- Jan 28, 2016
- Permalink
- burlesonjesse5
- Jan 27, 2016
- Permalink
First of all, this is not the absolute worst animated film. The voice acting is mainly good. A couple of the jokes are okay too, but may have occurred by accident. There, now the positives are out of the way, let's look at the negatives.
This film is horrible to look at, which is a bad sign for a visual medium. A lot of the characters move in a horribly jarring way, especially the villain, who moves like Mr Fantastic from the Fantastic Four having a seizure. This effect is amplified when they speak and move at the same time, since the line deliveries are clearly intended for a non-Woody Woodpecker character. Throughout the film, it doesn't quite seem like the characters themselves are talking. Then there's the character design. This ranges across a full spectrum, from laughable to just unpleasant.
Onto the writing! The idea for the story is not that bad, but it is not well executed. It feels drawn out for what it actually accomplishes. Aside from the story, many of the jokes fall flat, or actively detract from the viewing experience, particularly the lemmings/fake minions. There are comedy accents for no reason, sometimes so poorly done it becomes impossible to tell which accent they were meant to be.
Overall, this is just bad. I would give it a 3 or 4 out of 10, but there were two factors at play to stop me. Firstly, this is far too ugly for a visual medium. A film can be poorly made without being actively unpleasant just to look at. Secondly, this film has an inflated IMDb score due to fake reviews by the studio, following in the footsteps of Saving Christmas and After Last Season before it. As such, I'm giving this a 1/10.
This film is horrible to look at, which is a bad sign for a visual medium. A lot of the characters move in a horribly jarring way, especially the villain, who moves like Mr Fantastic from the Fantastic Four having a seizure. This effect is amplified when they speak and move at the same time, since the line deliveries are clearly intended for a non-Woody Woodpecker character. Throughout the film, it doesn't quite seem like the characters themselves are talking. Then there's the character design. This ranges across a full spectrum, from laughable to just unpleasant.
Onto the writing! The idea for the story is not that bad, but it is not well executed. It feels drawn out for what it actually accomplishes. Aside from the story, many of the jokes fall flat, or actively detract from the viewing experience, particularly the lemmings/fake minions. There are comedy accents for no reason, sometimes so poorly done it becomes impossible to tell which accent they were meant to be.
Overall, this is just bad. I would give it a 3 or 4 out of 10, but there were two factors at play to stop me. Firstly, this is far too ugly for a visual medium. A film can be poorly made without being actively unpleasant just to look at. Secondly, this film has an inflated IMDb score due to fake reviews by the studio, following in the footsteps of Saving Christmas and After Last Season before it. As such, I'm giving this a 1/10.
- benjaminweber
- Apr 4, 2018
- Permalink
I love polar bears, but this was scarring!!! Mainly because it stars Rob Schneider. Not only that, this movie feels like one of those cheap $1 movies whose DVD covers you see at Walmart. This movie is just a desperate attempt to be hip and cool with the kids. I'm even a 2000s kid, and I was offended by this film. Yes, this movie is even offensive to 2000s kids. Heck, even kids in GENERAL loathed this movie. The lemmings are basically the annoying little pooplets!!! This is so crappy. It is THAT bad. Nostalgia Critic even shaved his head because of this!!! WHAT KIND OF MOVIE IS THIS??!! IT'S LIKE GROUNDHOG DAY, EXCEPT IT'S SO UNFUNNY, THAT INSTEAD OF WATCHING BILL MURRAY, WE'RE WATCHING ROB SCHNEIDER!!!! Mr. Green is just as over the top as Chester V from Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs 2. This movie is its own asylum knock-off. That's how bad it is. Stay away from this movie.
- DannyD1997
- Aug 3, 2017
- Permalink
This movie is bad. This movie is so bad, I honestly don't even know how it exists. The animation looks more like a direct to DVD movie than a movie that should be allowed on theaters. The plot is so bad. If you think a polar bear who travels all the way to New York to try and save the Arctic because a guy is selling condos there, and the polar bear has the ability to speak to humans is a good plot, then it's your opinion, but it's still the worst plot in an animated movie. Granted, it is not the WORST animated movie ever, but it is still very bad, and is definitely in the top 5. It is even worse than The Emoji Movie. The movie is so boring, easily the worst animated movie I have ever seen in theaters.
- Miguels_MR
- Aug 30, 2020
- Permalink
Oh my gosh this movie is so bad omg I want to die it's so bad right now it gave me cancer and autism and aids cause it was so bad omg this movie sucks so hard it gave me aids cause it's so bad stay away avoid this piece of junk at all costs omg this movie is so incredibly terrible I don't know how or why this movie got made omg this actually got made omg this movie sucks so hard omg it made me want to die omg this made me want to die so so bad omg it gave me cancer on my face it was so bad stay away from it please.
- hausers-85204
- Jun 16, 2017
- Permalink