An attorney confesses that she had knowledge that her client committed a 22-year-old murder that another man was serving time for, but could not come forward because of attorney-client privilege.

Director:

Writers:

(created by),
Reviews

Watch Now

From $1.99 (SD) on Prime Video

ON TV

Photos

Add Image Add an image

Do you have any images for this title?

Edit

Cast

Episode cast overview, first billed only:
...
...
...
John Munch
...
...
...
Dr. George Huang (as B.D. Wong) (credit only)
...
Dr. Melinda Warner
...
...
...
Richard Morgan
...
Hopkins
...
Daniel Hardy
...
...
CSU Tech Keegan Timmons
...
Victor Tate
Edit

Storyline

An attorney confesses that she had knowledge that her client committed a 22-year-old murder that another man was serving time for, but could not come forward because of attorney-client privilege.

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis

Certificate:

TV-14 | See all certifications »
Edit

Details

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

10 March 2010 (USA)  »

Filming Locations:


Company Credits

Show more on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Sound Mix:

Color:

Aspect Ratio:

16:9 HD
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Goofs

The judge granted Richard Morgan pretrial release on the condition that he surrender his passport and be confined to his home with an electronic monitoring device, however she fails to set a bail amount and even says "bail is denied". When bail is denied a defendant is remanded into the custody of the department of corrections, being confined to house arrest is a form of being out on bail. See more »

Quotes

Elliot Stabler: DNA from the Nancy Pierce case is gone which means Daniel Hardy is now officially, eternally screwed. He is staying in prison for the rest of his miserable life.
See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
Attorney /client privilege
7 April 2016 | by See all my reviews

Other than the fact that I would have trouble believing that a man would kill two women a quarter of a century apart and have no others pop up on law enforcement's attention this is not a bad episode for SVU. It focuses on attorney/client privilege.

Richard Burgi plays a Donald Trump like billionaire who is connected to both a fresh case and the method suggests a very similar one a killing of a woman 25 years earlier.

But the focus here is on his attorney Lena Olin who has a strange relationship with Burgi, almost like she's his mommy. Definitely weird.

The state tries to hold her responsible as well, how much did she know or how much did she surmise and how far does attorney/client privilege go. Specifically it's Christopher Meloni who has the questions and he also has some issues from previous episodes.

Olin is very good here, but I can't believe that SVU couldn't connect this guy to other cases.


4 of 4 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you? | Report this
Review this title | See one user review »

Contribute to This Page

Stream Trending TV Series With Prime Video

Explore popular and recently added TV series available to stream with Prime Video.

Start your free trial