Young Albert enlists to serve in World War I after his beloved horse is sold to the cavalry. Albert's hopeful journey takes him out of England and to the front lines as the war rages on.Young Albert enlists to serve in World War I after his beloved horse is sold to the cavalry. Albert's hopeful journey takes him out of England and to the front lines as the war rages on.Young Albert enlists to serve in World War I after his beloved horse is sold to the cavalry. Albert's hopeful journey takes him out of England and to the front lines as the war rages on.
- Nominated for 6 Oscars
- 15 wins & 77 nominations total
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaDirector Steven Spielberg stated that the only digital effects used in the movie were three shots that lasted three seconds, and it was done to ensure the safety of the horse involved. Spielberg was quoted as saying, "That's the thing I'm most proud of. Everything you see on screen really happened."
- GoofsCaptain Nicholls is shown completely clean-shaven in 1914. In reality, British Army officers were not permitted to shave their upper lips until 1916.
- Quotes
Albert Narracott: We'll be alright Joey. We're the lucky ones, you and me. Lucky since the day I met you.
- ConnectionsFeatured in Breakfast: Episode dated 26 October 2011 (2011)
- SoundtracksThe Scarlet and the Blue
By John Tams and Adrian Sutton
Featured review
One of the weakest films of the year
Ever since I saw the trailer for War Horse back in early 2011, I was not impressed. It looked like a sappy, cheesily sentimental, and clichéd war film. When the film came out and started gaining Oscar buzz in the major categories, I was surprised and wondered
why? The reviews were also mostly positive, but I was still not convinced that I would like this. Well, I finally saw it, and guess what
it's not a good film, but it surprised me in the way as to why it's not a good film.
Yes, War Horse is sentimental, it's everything you would expect. This isn't an original film, but still, sometimes sentimentality works, but not here. From the get-go, you know what the film is trying to do, and that's pretty much all it has going for it. It feels like brainwash in an odd way. I started gaining hope at the 45 minute mark, as to maybe this could turn out differently. I started liking it more when the horse goes into it's first soldiers, but that didn't last long. The horse goes to different people, and all these people feel attached to it. The worse of these characters is of course, a young girl and her grandfather. The writing doesn't become more apparently bad than here. But it's not just that the film is sentimental and that that's all it tries to do, the dialogue is just atrocious in this section.
I am not a big Spielberg fan. I do like some of his films a lot, like Jaws and Schindler's List, but many times I also feel that many of his films are too messy. For example, from what I have seen of Saving Private Ryan, it's too messy, and Jurassic Park has very weak characterization. But I have never seen a film of his this sloppy. The negative reviews have already stated the obvious in this film, all of the sugary aspects and the sweetness trying to pour itself into the viewer, but what I had not seen addressed is how badly-constructed this is. Maybe it's the script's fault, but the editing is one of its worst aspects, if not its worst. In no time does it let you even absorb what is going on, and some of the editing in scenes is just awkward. Then again, maybe it was the script's fault, which is honestly one of the worst scripts of the year.
Technically as to how it looks, it looks okay. Despite what many may say about it technically, it isn't even anything brilliant. The cinematography is just sort of "there". I mean, it has the impressive landscape shots you expect, and the last few scenes of the film are really beautiful to look at, but in no way do they rise above superficiality. The camera-work isn't anything impressive because the director of photography never really does anything. Cinematography isn't just beautiful landscape shots, but the way you handle the camera angles, where the camera is placed, and everything related to the lens, coloring, and framing. The film never does anything worthwhile with the way it's shot, which is really disappointing because even I, who had no real expectations to like the film, was expecting some great cinematography at least. The music score is also so very predictable. No piece of the music stands out. Nothing remotely interesting about it. The only really great aspect of the film is the art direction, because you can really tell how much they worked on it, and it really is to be congratulated.
So, ultimately, this isn't a good film at all. I do not recommend it, because I didn't find it all that touching, and it also is so predictable and obvious in its attempt. But besides those obvious flaws, the film is also very sloppy and messy. No real character development, no real true character motivation. The most at fault here is the screenwriter and the editor, although it's hard to put so much blame on the editor when he had to work with a script like this. Saying all of this, I actually don't hate this film. I expected to hate it even more, but I simply can't. The only truly great scene here is the horse run through the trenches, but this is just not even a mediocre film. It's so weak, and did I mention so dull. I can't even count how many times I sighed and was constantly trying to keep myself awake. One of the weakest films of 2011.
Yes, War Horse is sentimental, it's everything you would expect. This isn't an original film, but still, sometimes sentimentality works, but not here. From the get-go, you know what the film is trying to do, and that's pretty much all it has going for it. It feels like brainwash in an odd way. I started gaining hope at the 45 minute mark, as to maybe this could turn out differently. I started liking it more when the horse goes into it's first soldiers, but that didn't last long. The horse goes to different people, and all these people feel attached to it. The worse of these characters is of course, a young girl and her grandfather. The writing doesn't become more apparently bad than here. But it's not just that the film is sentimental and that that's all it tries to do, the dialogue is just atrocious in this section.
I am not a big Spielberg fan. I do like some of his films a lot, like Jaws and Schindler's List, but many times I also feel that many of his films are too messy. For example, from what I have seen of Saving Private Ryan, it's too messy, and Jurassic Park has very weak characterization. But I have never seen a film of his this sloppy. The negative reviews have already stated the obvious in this film, all of the sugary aspects and the sweetness trying to pour itself into the viewer, but what I had not seen addressed is how badly-constructed this is. Maybe it's the script's fault, but the editing is one of its worst aspects, if not its worst. In no time does it let you even absorb what is going on, and some of the editing in scenes is just awkward. Then again, maybe it was the script's fault, which is honestly one of the worst scripts of the year.
Technically as to how it looks, it looks okay. Despite what many may say about it technically, it isn't even anything brilliant. The cinematography is just sort of "there". I mean, it has the impressive landscape shots you expect, and the last few scenes of the film are really beautiful to look at, but in no way do they rise above superficiality. The camera-work isn't anything impressive because the director of photography never really does anything. Cinematography isn't just beautiful landscape shots, but the way you handle the camera angles, where the camera is placed, and everything related to the lens, coloring, and framing. The film never does anything worthwhile with the way it's shot, which is really disappointing because even I, who had no real expectations to like the film, was expecting some great cinematography at least. The music score is also so very predictable. No piece of the music stands out. Nothing remotely interesting about it. The only really great aspect of the film is the art direction, because you can really tell how much they worked on it, and it really is to be congratulated.
So, ultimately, this isn't a good film at all. I do not recommend it, because I didn't find it all that touching, and it also is so predictable and obvious in its attempt. But besides those obvious flaws, the film is also very sloppy and messy. No real character development, no real true character motivation. The most at fault here is the screenwriter and the editor, although it's hard to put so much blame on the editor when he had to work with a script like this. Saying all of this, I actually don't hate this film. I expected to hate it even more, but I simply can't. The only truly great scene here is the horse run through the trenches, but this is just not even a mediocre film. It's so weak, and did I mention so dull. I can't even count how many times I sighed and was constantly trying to keep myself awake. One of the weakest films of 2011.
helpful•119
- Red_Identity
- Jan 8, 2012
Details
- Release date
- Countries of origin
- Official sites
- Languages
- Also known as
- Warhorse
- Filming locations
- Castle Combe, Chippenham, Wiltshire, England, UK(horse auction)
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Budget
- $66,000,000 (estimated)
- Gross US & Canada
- $79,884,879
- Opening weekend US & Canada
- $7,515,402
- Dec 25, 2011
- Gross worldwide
- $177,584,879
- Runtime2 hours 26 minutes
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 2.39 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content