A drama set on New Year's Eve 1999 in a luxurious Swiss hotel where the lives of hotel workers and various guests get intertwined.A drama set on New Year's Eve 1999 in a luxurious Swiss hotel where the lives of hotel workers and various guests get intertwined.A drama set on New Year's Eve 1999 in a luxurious Swiss hotel where the lives of hotel workers and various guests get intertwined.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
- Awards
- 1 win & 1 nomination total
Ema Mur
- Russian Girl
- (as Ema Kovac)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
Realizing that he himself would soon go into oblivion, he probably said his last word to this rotten and two-faced world, in which not a hint of decency and principles remained.
Almost all the characters and their actions are clear who they represent in the real world, although in some places there is a little fog. Quite a funny, superficial grotesque look at what has happened to the world in the last 30 years.
But Polanski's characteristic subtle style is weakly visible here; rather, this is the work of two other Polish screenwriters, as the main "traction" horses; he was on this list rather as a consultant and architect of the general line; he most likely has not had the strength to create everything himself for a long time . Everything is too rough, especially the ending. It does not shock at all, but rather saddens, recalling Polanski's old works.
The subtle, complex acting and skirmishes that you expect from Polanski's films are practically absent here.
Is it worth watching? Against the backdrop of that endless wave of sludge and bad taste, Hollywood certainly, perhaps his last venture in his life, deserves it. The trouble is that he does not present deep thoughts, everything is too superficial. For the sophisticated public, everything quickly becomes boring, but for the inexperienced it is rather pointless.
The sophisticated public on the planet understands perfectly well what the remnants of the former civilization are moving towards quite quickly, but the unsophisticated public is more and more busy with animal survival and has no time for self-reflection and assessment of the situation in the world.
It is clear that this creation will certainly be hated in the USA (and this is mutual from Polanski personally) and quite strongly in Europe. That is why the rating is intentionally low and there are no large number of ratings. The majority of the population has neither critical thinking nor the self-sufficiency of outlook to independently shape their destiny and evaluate what is really happening around them - they are shaped by it, skillfully forcing them to follow the indicated track leading straight to the abyss, like horses rushing in blinkers...
Almost all the characters and their actions are clear who they represent in the real world, although in some places there is a little fog. Quite a funny, superficial grotesque look at what has happened to the world in the last 30 years.
But Polanski's characteristic subtle style is weakly visible here; rather, this is the work of two other Polish screenwriters, as the main "traction" horses; he was on this list rather as a consultant and architect of the general line; he most likely has not had the strength to create everything himself for a long time . Everything is too rough, especially the ending. It does not shock at all, but rather saddens, recalling Polanski's old works.
The subtle, complex acting and skirmishes that you expect from Polanski's films are practically absent here.
Is it worth watching? Against the backdrop of that endless wave of sludge and bad taste, Hollywood certainly, perhaps his last venture in his life, deserves it. The trouble is that he does not present deep thoughts, everything is too superficial. For the sophisticated public, everything quickly becomes boring, but for the inexperienced it is rather pointless.
The sophisticated public on the planet understands perfectly well what the remnants of the former civilization are moving towards quite quickly, but the unsophisticated public is more and more busy with animal survival and has no time for self-reflection and assessment of the situation in the world.
It is clear that this creation will certainly be hated in the USA (and this is mutual from Polanski personally) and quite strongly in Europe. That is why the rating is intentionally low and there are no large number of ratings. The majority of the population has neither critical thinking nor the self-sufficiency of outlook to independently shape their destiny and evaluate what is really happening around them - they are shaped by it, skillfully forcing them to follow the indicated track leading straight to the abyss, like horses rushing in blinkers...
The media are underplaying the major event of the new Roman Polanski with the categorisation: a bad Polanski, probably his worst. And the scribblers forget one fact: a bad Polanski is largely subject to impossibility. Perhaps the popularly celebrated condemnation is still due to the witch hunt as part of the unspeakable MeToo smear campaign. In "J'Accuse" there was no artistic attack surface whatsoever, but here there is a little more. A light and entertaining film, undoubtedly in the realm of comedy, so intentional, so brought to the screen. The Palace is obviously modelled on the screwball comedies of the pre-50s.
We find ourselves in the millennium night of 1999, a luxury hotel in the Swiss mountains, a meeting place for the formerly beautiful and supposedly rich. A rendezvous of bizarre characters, chaotic events and crazy entanglements unfolds, all madly directed by hotel manager Oliver Mansucci, currently Germany's best acting export. Lots of familiar faces and not a minute of boredom, mission accomplished.
We find ourselves in the millennium night of 1999, a luxury hotel in the Swiss mountains, a meeting place for the formerly beautiful and supposedly rich. A rendezvous of bizarre characters, chaotic events and crazy entanglements unfolds, all madly directed by hotel manager Oliver Mansucci, currently Germany's best acting export. Lots of familiar faces and not a minute of boredom, mission accomplished.
It is New Year's Eve 1999, at a luxury hotel in Switzerland. A grotesque gallery of the filthy rich gather to see in the new year, with many afraid the Y2K bug is imminently about to destroy western civilization...
-------------
Roman Polanski's latest film flopped at the box office and got awful reviews, but of course that's mostly because of the present political climate and the line the mainstream media have taken to "cancel" its creator. The film IS indubitably erratic, especially early on: full use is not made of the majority of story-lines, and most don't conclude in any satisfactory way. It also feels a little rushed and uncertain and as though several corners (and scenes) were cut. But there are a bunch of funny and ludicrous moments along the way, and the overall freak-show tone of it - the nightmarish way it depicts humanity, especially the very rich - feels much like something out of Gulliver's Travels. It doesn't more than half-succeed at any point, but at least it's reaching for something.
The cast has a variety of slightly over the hill famous faces, like Mickey Rourke, Fanny Ardant, and John Cleese as a nonagenarian oil tycoon celebrating his one year wedding anniversary with his dumpy young bride. But the best performance is probably by Hansueli Kopf, as the hotel director tirelessly trying to please them all and hold the show together.
Polanski has always been terrible at comedy; much too broad and heavy-handed, and it's clear some of the things that make him laugh don't translate into tickling most other people. But the truth is, I definitely enjoyed this one more than any of his other ones, like "The Fearless Vampire Killers", "What?" and "Pirates". I could be wrong, but the impression I get is that he just wanted one time to make a decent comedy before he dies, and if this does turn out to be the last film he ever makes, he really didn't do as bad as we're being told.
-------------
Roman Polanski's latest film flopped at the box office and got awful reviews, but of course that's mostly because of the present political climate and the line the mainstream media have taken to "cancel" its creator. The film IS indubitably erratic, especially early on: full use is not made of the majority of story-lines, and most don't conclude in any satisfactory way. It also feels a little rushed and uncertain and as though several corners (and scenes) were cut. But there are a bunch of funny and ludicrous moments along the way, and the overall freak-show tone of it - the nightmarish way it depicts humanity, especially the very rich - feels much like something out of Gulliver's Travels. It doesn't more than half-succeed at any point, but at least it's reaching for something.
The cast has a variety of slightly over the hill famous faces, like Mickey Rourke, Fanny Ardant, and John Cleese as a nonagenarian oil tycoon celebrating his one year wedding anniversary with his dumpy young bride. But the best performance is probably by Hansueli Kopf, as the hotel director tirelessly trying to please them all and hold the show together.
Polanski has always been terrible at comedy; much too broad and heavy-handed, and it's clear some of the things that make him laugh don't translate into tickling most other people. But the truth is, I definitely enjoyed this one more than any of his other ones, like "The Fearless Vampire Killers", "What?" and "Pirates". I could be wrong, but the impression I get is that he just wanted one time to make a decent comedy before he dies, and if this does turn out to be the last film he ever makes, he really didn't do as bad as we're being told.
I've been looking forward to this film for a long time and I haven't been disappointed. I was a bit irritated by the bad citics, but after watching the film, I realized that it was a Hollwood smear campaign against Polanski and his film. Non political correctness, non compromises. Typical Polanski style. This is not Hollywood trash, its serious Cineme. If you don´t like it, go watch "Barbie", "Everything Everywhere All at Once" or another Hollywood trash.
I read a few of the bad Reviews. I don't understand why it's hard to rate this movie, or why the movie is politically hard to defend? Is it because of Putins New Year's address? LOL
This is a damn fine comedy/Satire and it deserves at least one Oscar Nominee. Unfortunately, Hollywood these days is all about politics.
Normally, I would give the movie 8 stars, but because of the hate, i give it 9 Stars. Hopefully it wasn't Polanski's last film. He should get an Oscar for his life's work, but it's not going to happen. Hollywood, take your political correctness and go to Hell.
I recommend the film to all those who are still interested in real Cinema.
I read a few of the bad Reviews. I don't understand why it's hard to rate this movie, or why the movie is politically hard to defend? Is it because of Putins New Year's address? LOL
This is a damn fine comedy/Satire and it deserves at least one Oscar Nominee. Unfortunately, Hollywood these days is all about politics.
Normally, I would give the movie 8 stars, but because of the hate, i give it 9 Stars. Hopefully it wasn't Polanski's last film. He should get an Oscar for his life's work, but it's not going to happen. Hollywood, take your political correctness and go to Hell.
I recommend the film to all those who are still interested in real Cinema.
The movie was never boring, and i never felt grabing a smartphone.
If the movie is for you, depends on your type of humor - it's just as in the trailers, if you are just happy with this type of simple and stereotypical humor, the movie might very well be worth watching. It's not bad, and its certainly not for feminist's. But if you'd like to take your (old) father to the cinema once more, you'll both be happy.
You can't compare it to a masterpiece like grand hotel budapest.
But if i'd see the movie in free tv somewhere in the future again, i'd certainly watch it.
If you see it as a last movie from polanski, with his high age, it's neither a masterpiece and its certainly not a failure either.
I for myself liked it. See it for yourself, just don't put your expectations too high.
If the movie is for you, depends on your type of humor - it's just as in the trailers, if you are just happy with this type of simple and stereotypical humor, the movie might very well be worth watching. It's not bad, and its certainly not for feminist's. But if you'd like to take your (old) father to the cinema once more, you'll both be happy.
You can't compare it to a masterpiece like grand hotel budapest.
But if i'd see the movie in free tv somewhere in the future again, i'd certainly watch it.
If you see it as a last movie from polanski, with his high age, it's neither a masterpiece and its certainly not a failure either.
I for myself liked it. See it for yourself, just don't put your expectations too high.
Did you know
- TriviaWhen suggesting to use a bandaid for Bongo's nose, Hansueli suggests he would look like "that actor" in "that movie". He's speaking of Jack Nicholson in Roman Polanski's Chinatown (1974).
- GoofsChampagne, especially a $12,450 bottle of Bollinger 1938 vintage champagne, would never under any circumstances be served at room temperature.
- Quotes
Arthur William Dallas III: Can I have that blowjob now?
- ConnectionsReferences Chinatown (1974)
- SoundtracksMambo No.5 (A Little Bit Of...)
Written by Dámaso Pérez Prado, Lou Bega and Zippy Davids
Performed by Lou Bega
- How long is The Palace?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Countries of origin
- Official site
- Languages
- Also known as
- Палац
- Filming locations
- Palace Hotel, Gstaad, Switzerland(main location)
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Budget
- €21,000,000 (estimated)
- Gross worldwide
- $972,161
- Runtime1 hour 40 minutes
- Color
- Sound mix
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content
