Second of two pornography-themed films (in two years) for actor James Franco. The first: 'About Cherry'. See more »
When the door is opened at hotel after the beach scene, the door handle has a magnetic key card slot, specifically a Ving Card 980 not released until the mid-to-late 1990s. See more »
Fifty, maybe a hundred thousand.
To do another fuck film?
No, Linda, it's Shakespeare. I told them you do a great English accent, particularly with a cock down your throat.
See more »
"How's it feel to be the poster girl for the Sexual Revolution?"
The general quality of both the acting and cinematography is fair to middlin', nothing spectacular. Juno Temple, Sharon Stone, and Robert Patrick, however, all give notable performances as, respectively, Linda's buddy and her cold, distant, puritanical parents. LOVELACE captures the atmosphere of the '70s pretty decently. The story's broken up, and some of the time-lapses are quite jarring. Still, the flashbacks do allow for some elements of surprise if you're not already familiar with the details of Linda's life (as I wasn't).
The end of the film is what really redeems it. LOVELACE's best single aspect is its portrayal of the porno film industry and how the exploitation often goes much deeper than simply pressuring naive young ladies into being filmed doing things they loathe doing. There are, of course, many sides to any story: Some will like the slant LOVELACE takes; others inevitably won't. The makers of this film may have gone a bit too far in portraying Linda Boreman/Lovelace as a completely innocent girl-next-door who just happened to fall in with the wrong guy and his crowd, but I can see how that was hard to avoid.
Considering the subject matter, there is very little graphic sex/nudity, and it was obviously wise to avoid making an admonitory bio-drama about a porn star into a porno film in its own right.
14 of 20 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?
| Report this