Two journalists arrive in the small-town of Mitchin, Iowa in 1994 on a mission to solve a string of mysterious murders that started four years prior.Two journalists arrive in the small-town of Mitchin, Iowa in 1994 on a mission to solve a string of mysterious murders that started four years prior.Two journalists arrive in the small-town of Mitchin, Iowa in 1994 on a mission to solve a string of mysterious murders that started four years prior.
Robert Douglas Metson
- Thomas Wajowski
- (as Robert Metson)
Featured reviews
So, the premise is a couple of journalists that go investigating murders in a town in Iowa. It's definitely a found footage deal and its set in the 90s. The concept isn't anything majorly new but I like the premise of the interviews. I think some die hard horror people have criticised this and thought that it was just filler and maybe there should be a few more jumps, but to be fair, all the interviews unravel something so they are integral. I think this is definitely not one for people who want to see shocking, crazy horror, but for mystery people like me I found it simple , slick and love the 90s vibe. Nobody seems to mentioning the acting which I think is really great all round , in fact I have seldom seen a horror film this low budget with good acting. Georgie Mcguigan really carries what must be a difficult role well and the smaller characters are good. They probably went a little too far on the raw camera work to be honest which can be a bit of a nuisance but there are some what seems to be HD scenes mixed in and you feel that you are watching something really cool.
Really quite liked this film. They have gone hardcore on the 90s VHS vibe, I think it may have even be filmed on one of those old school VHS cameras to be honest. That is a take it or leave it thing I would say but I guess I can see how some people may not like it. The plot is not a crazy scary horror, this is a mystery horror, so don't go expecting a death a minute because its a lot of interviews but I don't need loads of deaths. Its pretty slick and clever and the pace is good. But what makes it great are the actors, the acting is fantastic , all the main characters are great with no weak link . Definitely worth a watch if you want a simple super 90s mystery - horror.
I thought this film was clever, intriguing and entertaining. It's definitely lo fi and they probably over did it with the 90s camera but I was engaged until the end and all the actors were great which you can't usually say for low budget horrors.
It's definitely more of a mystery than a slasher - horror film so don't go into it thinking you are going to get loads of deaths and killings, but the twists and turns are very clever and I like the soundtrack and the 90s vibe. Georgie Mcguigan as the central role keeps the energy up throughout and there are fine performances from Kate Winter, Phillippa Dawson and some others.
It's definitely more of a mystery than a slasher - horror film so don't go into it thinking you are going to get loads of deaths and killings, but the twists and turns are very clever and I like the soundtrack and the 90s vibe. Georgie Mcguigan as the central role keeps the energy up throughout and there are fine performances from Kate Winter, Phillippa Dawson and some others.
I had read the reviews for this film which has been getting a lot of press from social media. Some reviews good, some reviews bad, so I thought its definitely time for me to give this a go. First of all I would like to say that I am a slasher movie / proper horror fan so this was definitely more on the myster/thriller side for me, which wasn't quite what I was expecting after the beginning sequence, but I have to say it was well crafted. Its based on interviews around the town which are well acted , the 'ninetiesness' of the camera can get in the way sometimes. Its probably better to use a high res camera and then add 90s grain (my film geek coming out) . Somebody reviewed it on TikTok and said that the shots were amateur looking - they are supposed to be its supposed to be an amateur documentary! - The ending I wasn't expecting and that's why I think this was smart. So yeah not my usual tastes but somebody had to call out that this is a good effort.
Trying to uncover the truth about her small-town, a reporter and her friend set out to make a documentary about a series of murders that occurred in her home town several years earlier, but when they gradually uncover evidence of a real serial killer still hunting in the area must stop his rampage.
This was a decent if highly troubling mockumentary effort. One of the brighter points here is a straightforward and simplistic storyline that lets the series of events depicted here come together rather well. The initial introduction to the story and how it gets brought up involving the events in the town and how they affected the lives of the filmmakers growing up is a solid touch, especially with the way the series of interviews that get brought into play are utilized. These offer a solid look at the different individuals present here involving the different bits of information that are revealed about what really happened, how the different events went down, and the lives being affected which spur the finale where the turn into a field investigation takes place. The second half features this investigation in the field, featuring more random interviews, and setting out to look into the truth about the claims of everything being based on a boogeyman, resulting in the reveal that the killer is still around taking victims which has some fun moments. This section does manage to slow the pace down considerably with the decision to investigate the towns' history rather than stay involved in the current case, as the background information doesn't prove any more useful at figuring out what's happening. The focus away from the current to look at the past that has no bearing is a misstep with little happening, forced interviews trying to bring something useful to light, and very little action at all making for a generally disappointing time and being the big issues that hold it down.
Rated Unrated/R: Language and Violence.
This was a decent if highly troubling mockumentary effort. One of the brighter points here is a straightforward and simplistic storyline that lets the series of events depicted here come together rather well. The initial introduction to the story and how it gets brought up involving the events in the town and how they affected the lives of the filmmakers growing up is a solid touch, especially with the way the series of interviews that get brought into play are utilized. These offer a solid look at the different individuals present here involving the different bits of information that are revealed about what really happened, how the different events went down, and the lives being affected which spur the finale where the turn into a field investigation takes place. The second half features this investigation in the field, featuring more random interviews, and setting out to look into the truth about the claims of everything being based on a boogeyman, resulting in the reveal that the killer is still around taking victims which has some fun moments. This section does manage to slow the pace down considerably with the decision to investigate the towns' history rather than stay involved in the current case, as the background information doesn't prove any more useful at figuring out what's happening. The focus away from the current to look at the past that has no bearing is a misstep with little happening, forced interviews trying to bring something useful to light, and very little action at all making for a generally disappointing time and being the big issues that hold it down.
Rated Unrated/R: Language and Violence.
Storyline
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official sites
- Language
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime1 hour 18 minutes
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content
