Glee (TV Series 2009–2015) Poster


User Reviews

Review this title
190 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Used to be a guilty pleasure, but has long jumped the shark
Foux_du_Fafa29 April 2013
What I really liked about "Glee" in its first two seasons was that the characters and their situations were so easy to relate to, especially for someone like me (and many others, naturally) who went to a conservative, small-town school and never seemed to fit in. Despite the odd ridiculous moment or some bland covers of already bland songs, "Glee" became a true guilty pleasure, and I put the emphasis more on pleasure than on guilty. However, the whole premise of it involving a group of pupils at a high school would mean that it was never meant to last that long, and I do think it should have stopped once the main characters had left the school. Now the ridiculousness has become more and more pronounced, and I've stopped paying attention to the series. Sorry.
23 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Fake, Forced "Happy" Show
applescruff420-19 June 2010
Warning: Spoilers
This show bothers me. And I can't fully articulate why I does in a concise way, but I guess I'll just throw out a bunch of very specific things that I can't stand in order to try and build the bigger picture: The first problem this show has is the heavily Auto Tuned sound of its "singers". I understand that several of the actors and actresses on this show are well trained and very talented in their own right, but the creators never let you know that. They take EVERY SINGLE VOCAL sung by anyone on this show and strip all nuance, dynamic and wavering pitch from it. These are computers we are listening to. Nobody sings "perfectly" but due to the unfortunate practice of "fixing" vocals in all modern music, this show makes possibly talented people sound like any hack singer who actually needs the pitch correction, and by doing so makes all performers on the show indistinguishable from one another (an odd decision considering how much this show would seem to promote individuality).

Another thing I take issue with is the facile, broad, borderline offensive way they approach the "issues" these characters have. In a recent episode, the kid in the wheelchair gets told about a procedure that could possibly fix his spine and allow him to pursue his ultimate dream of dancing. After a few scenes the show seems to suggest that he did the procedure and they have him leap out of his chair and do an elaborate dance number in the middle of a shopping mall. Obviously, the bait and switch comes, and that was merely a dream sequence. I guess that scene was supposed to feel cathartic, but I came away from it feeling deeply offended at the nonchalance the writers and creators have when dealing with this character's very real situation. There are many other examples of this approach (the one girl's pregnancy, the other girl's search for her mother). I'd like to note that I do know the names of these characters, but the writing of the show generally does not allow any person on screen a life beyond his or her basic archetype, so naming them almost seems beside the point.

The thing I have the biggest problem with is the tone this show takes. I have no problem with the notion of a show with a sunny attitude towards life and all its problems and complexity. The issue I take is when a show grazes over the "problems and complexity" part and jumps straight to the sunny attitude. If this show didn't present people that would appear to have real life problems; if it didn't pretend to address serious issues in an attempt to create the facade of depth; if it was merely a show about young kids with big dreams singing in the school's glee club, I could get behind it and appreciate its positive outlook. The creators made a conscious decision to address things like teenage pregnancy, sexual identity and other real life concerns, only to fail to actually address any of them with any thoughtfulness or care. Thus, the show's happy tone feels like it hasn't been earned and ultimately comes out feeling forced and delusional. In order to "smile though your heart is aching", you have to understand the ache.

Glee doesn't.
186 out of 274 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Just What the Doctor Ordered!
rebecca-fair-poulos21 May 2009
I can just picture the creator, Ryan Murphy (Nip/Tuck) tossing ideas around with producers or writers or what-have-you and just saying "Let's do something happy." If this is the goal, "Glee" delivers.

With the combination of dreary times and warm weather "Glee" is just what the doctor ordered! Was the plot amazing? Not according to what we're used to. Shows these days seem to continually descend in to a deeper and deeper spiral of darkness. Don't get me wrong, I love it! Prickly characters are called "love-to-hate" for good reason, but there's a reason there is more than one category on the food pyramid. "Glee" is the perfect answer to a well- rounded entertainment diet.

At the very least "Glee" has set itself up to be a showcase for amazing talent including Lea Michele who rightfully earned a name for herself on Broadway with the hit "Spring Awakening" as Rachel Berry and newcomer Cory Monteith as Finn Hudson who may not be as talented as Michele, but was perfectly cast for the part. He does exactly what he's supposed to do which is to keep up with and support Michele who will send chills down your spine.

"Glee" seems like a familiar tale "The football player wants to sing and the unpopular girl also wants to sing!" but when was the last time we really saw this? Okay... disregard "High School Musical." This isn't "HSM." This is "HSM" done right--with real talent--and not actually a musical. The songs are all time-tested and well loved familiar tunes, i.e. Journey's "Don't Stop Believing" and the show isn't designed around the songs or for the songs like a musical... you'll know what I mean when you see it!

*Synopsis* A bright eyed and optimistic teacher, Will Schuester (played by Matthew Morrison) decides to revamp the Glee club. He dreams of making it something truly great around which the school can come together. From where we, the audience stand, he came into a glee club already filled with tremendous talent including Rachel Berry who dreams of fame and carving a niche for herself, but what was missing was a strong male lead. To do this Will (nefariously) recruits the star football player who finds himself right at home. *End Synopsis*

There may be moments in the pilot where the not-instant-fan may consider "I'll bet this moment was meant to make me laugh out loud... but I'm not," but I say to you that is not what this show is about. It's about the average... the conceivable, but if you and the people around you just wanted to sing and were good at it too. Most importantly it's a showcase just meant to keep you smiling.

Even if characters were to, in the course of time in the sometimes unpredictable television world, jump into bed with each other or perform a murder, I take comfort in the feeling this show will not be about that. It will be about happy entertainment with an "I wish I could buy the world a Coke" attitude.

Because this show does not have the (ironically) familiar twists, dips, flips, turns and drama other shows offer, I feel the logical grade to assign this show would have to be a B- for being somewhat "undeveloped" by modern standards. (Nobody has been abused to speak of yet.) However, despite the undeniable likelihood this show will never be listed in my top five, even for the year, I can pretty much guarantee it will be the show which I most look forward to watching out of any other. For this reason, "Glee" gets an A+ in my heart and I hope to form a "Glee" club of my own taking place Tuesday nights on my living room couch.

Glee is certainly a welcome summer booster shot of summer fun.
166 out of 261 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Very disappointed with season 4
Rebekah Whitman22 February 2013
Season 1 was fantastic. The plot was amazing and the characters where like able (or at least relatable). Then season 2 came along. It wasn't as brilliant as season 1 but it was still enjoyable. Season 3 started well but then became a downward spiral. The characters were starting to loose what made them, them. I could still watch all of it but sometimes I just couldn't stand some parts. Now we're on season 4 and I just cannot stand the show anymore. I could barely make it through the first episode. The new characters are just awful and there's nothing like able. They tried to make a new Puck with Jake but they failed because no one can be Puck. I just wanted so bad to keep watching the show in hopes that it would get better but now I'm on episode 2 and I'm done. Season 1 episode 1 had me Immedietly but this newest season is a complete disaster. And worst of all is that all the returning characters have completely lost their spark. I wouldn't be surprised if the show got canceled after this season.
66 out of 99 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Such a Missed Opportunity
someofusarebrave6 February 2011
Warning: Spoilers
I really wanted to like this show.

I was all set to love it, in fact. I love musicals and I love a good soapy high school drama--or so I thought I did, before this show began.

This is the show who taught me who I am, by teaching me whom I am not.

I am not a Gleeker. I am not somebody who can get behind a show which represents students surviving some of the most difficult things any student can ever face unscathed because of some innate self-confidence.

I am not all right with treating racism as though it is something which can be solved with a few choice solos and some rad fashion.

I am not okay with acting as though a young girl can survive through to her sophomore year of high school with utterly no friends her own age just because she has a supportive environment at home.

I am not so great with the idea of an episode dedicated to girlpower focusing on Madonna songs, when Madonna is the one female singer who made a career out of prancing around half-naked onstage and "reinventing" herself so that it was impossible to figure out who she actually was ever. I am not all right with the fact that even this episode concentrated mainly on the men's interpretations of events.

Rachel chooses not to have sex not because she does not WANT to, but because she wants to hold onto her virginity. Finn sleeps with a girl who clearly views her body as just one more thing for her to leverage to earn the popularity and success she wishes for. He has no problem with this, apparently, or at least none that would prevent him from sleeping with her. Will almost has sex, but when his partner of choice decides not to go there with him he switches into condescending "Daddy" mode almost immediately. Even this episode winds up being about the men "wising up" to how difficult the women students have it in this society, not the women actually rising up and DOING something about it.

Most of these episodes are about raising difficult issues but not doing anything about it. Discussing issues without taking action is kinda the foundation behind the feminist movement--and is also the reason that said movement failed.

Also, none of the women on this show ever talk to one another except to tear each other down or talk about boys. That makes this show entirely sexist, according to Inga Muscio...and I tend to agree with her.

I believe strongly that Lea Michele has a solid career ahead of her.

I just hope she finds something worthy of her talents. Ditto Kurt.

Nobody gets through their teenage years unscathed. The answer however is not "expressing yourself" in the sense of skipping down hallways singing other people's lyrics at the top of your's figuring out who YOU are, what YOU need to say and who you need to say it to.

It is also learning the boundaries necessary to learn to say these things in private, rather than making your entire life a battle for others to decipher what you are actually trying to say versus what others have prepped you to say for a competition.

Express yourself, fine...but do the world a favor, please, and think about what you have to say and why first?
30 out of 43 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Glee: nothing special.
toonayoshi13 April 2010
Warning: Spoilers
I was really pumped up for Glee after watching the pilot episode; it seemed like a promising musical comedy. However, throughout season one, I found myself facing disappointment after disappointment.

The only real reason why any other episode after pilot was considered "good" was because it wasn't as bad compared to the previous episode aired. Character development was thrown out the window. "Canon" couples have no basis (i.e. just paired because they're the main characters, paired because the series needs more couples, etc.). Rivalries spring up without a legitimate reason, except to add the needed drama and to have a main antagonist. The humor degenerated with each passing episode-- more of an attempt at crude humor that shows that the script writers were just trying too hard.

The sectionals finale was a big disappointment. Instead of setting up for an actual battle between Glee clubs, the competitors were ridiculous rather than challenging. The Jane Adams girls were great in their performance, no doubt, and they could have been made into tough competitors. But adding in kids from the school of the deaf is an example of failed comedy. The final blow was when both of these schools ever did was consent to copying Schuester's set list, and that the judges didn't really give a crap/know about how to professionally judge this competition-- not that there was any. Where's the anticipation in that?

Only highlight for season two is probably the guest stars. Otherwise, Glee's not that different from, let's say, the Disney channel-- unless you're into the dramatized Kids' Bop kind of stuff. Great singers, bad story (or lack thereof).
49 out of 76 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
BasiliskSt19 July 2009
Glee presents a nascent high school glee club ready to blossom with the right talent and encouragement.

The lead characters from the adviser to the historically unpopular glee club members are genuinely engaging and attractive, albeit even as occasional subjects of hyperbole.

Our family found it hard to resist the show's charm. From teenagers to parents we were hooked and are anxious for more.

It will be challenging to keep up the level of production demonstrated in the pilot episode, but if Glee manages, Fox will have a truly great hit on its hands.

Lea Michele deserves special mention for her clear, powerful voice and high energy whether moving or standing still. As a sophomore desperate for fame she's credible and her dream doesn't seem impossible when you hear her sing.
142 out of 242 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Good, But Not THAT Good
joliefille4116 February 2010
Warning: Spoilers
I will say there is something about Glee that has managed to keep me coming back despite several misgivings. It certainly has no lack of talent and sheer desire to have FUN. However, the mid-season finale has really set me back once again.

First the good. I find the actors to be wonderful (note: I am saying actors, not characters.) With the exception of Finn, whom I've heard most accurately described as sounding like a synthesized Cher, they have some wonderful singers and I am no small fan of Broadway style acting and singing. Lea Michele as Rachel is a shining star among the cast- I will give her that. Although I am bound to begrudge the casting crew for trying to pass off obviously twenty-somethings as high schoolers, I can gladly suspend some amount of disbelief if it buys us better talent.

The music is also tremendous- amazing quality period, not just for a TV show. The range of songs has been great, but I'm slipping in my first problem here: how in the world are they passing off these booty songs in high school settings? The Bootylicious number wouldn't have made it anywhere near a school-sponsored club, and Mr. Schuester singing Bust a Move to his students was reaaallly uncomfortable to watch.

Those quibbles aside, what drags the show down is an entire slate of unlikeable characters and a terribly written story. The only character that you can root for is the villain, Sue, because she is so completely evil and doesn't try to fool us by being all wishy-washy about it. Rachel, the diva is so gratingly annoying, you cannot celebrate the talent she rightly possesses. Finn may be a victim of Quinn's lies, but even when he thinks he's the father of her child, he still pursues Rachel and makes no effort to support the baby. Quinn cheats on her boyfriend and then traps him in a responsibility he does not own. Puck is the worst written character of the series, having completely different personalities and arcs from episode to episode. Kurt is manipulative and catty, and no, his sexual orientation shouldn't act as a free pass for mean spiritedness. Even the background characters display more unappealing traits than good.

But that is nothing, NOTHING compared the poor, poor job they did with the adult triangle. Basically, the writers set out to make Terri the biggest witch they could so everyone could say "aww, it's okay" when Will Schuester would eventually cheat on her with Emma, the school counselor. Only it's not okay. And I really don't appreciate feeling manipulated into a situation where I am supposed to condone cheating. Yeah, Terri's self-absorbed and more than a little dim, but guess what? She's his wife. And maybe, like she said, if he didn't always go off soaking up Emma's adoration to punch up his ego (and don't even try to kid yourself that it was all innocent) she wouldn't have been gone to such extremes to keep from losing him. And for all of Emma's doe-eyed Bambiness, she is going after a married man!

So underneath all the feel-good songs and passionate glances and cute gleefulness that is Glee, here is the heart of the show: it's okay to do really horrible things to other people if it makes you feel better for the time being. Because isn't feeling good now just way better than having to have all those icky feelings that come with deep, meaningful relationships? Wow, that's a message for the generations to come.
45 out of 75 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
kind of a loss of anything good here
erin giesse6 April 2011
From the Pilot to the latest episodes to have been released from the second season, last at this point being 'Original Song', there have been some major plot changes and the storyline has gone drastically downhill. It used to be a very captivating show that left you drooling and gripping your remote waiting for the next Tuesday night just so you can see what happens next and how it will progress. Giving such life to Kurt, Puck, and other characters who weren't spotlighted on in the first season, it became something that you had to see to watch the underdog rise up. It was a truly inspiring underdog story. In such a short period of time and 45 episodes into the hit T.V. show they have turned it from captivating story to "when is it going to get good again?" They have killed any interesting characters in a metaphorical sense, and destroyed any plot that may have been and replaced it with something that looks like "what can we do to put in random sh*t that has nothing to do with anything just for the hell of it and screw any sort of good story?" I will hope to see something good happen by the end of Season 2 or hope that they just cancel the show altogether instead of watch it destroy itself and go completely under.
52 out of 91 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Irony Lives! . . .and has a soul
gwoof3 September 2009
As someone who gets hives when a Journey song comes on the radio, I was taken by surprise at how good Glee is. An exceptionally attractive and talented cast focuses a spotlight--both figuratively and literally--on the ultimate dweebs of high school: glee club.

It is no surprise that this show arises from the same writer for "Popular" . . . that short-lived and underrated second-tier network series with a similar setting. What is surprising is how well they integrate the music with the story line. What keeps it from being saccharine is the self-awareness and not-even-close-to-subtle wink to the camera that "yes, we are manipulating your feelings from high school." It is remarkably effective. At the same time it is a parody, it still connects us to that time when we all felt like the outcasts in High School. And make us feel like we could have had a voice if we only had a glee club like this one.
123 out of 231 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Music lovers rejoice!
beachboygrl24 October 2009 the plot line of the new Fox TV series "Glee" leaves a lot to be desired. In many instances, plot points from earlier episodes are ignored entirely in later episodes (like the mandate that all songs be about God or balloons after the club put on a sexed-up routine to "Push It" at a pep rally) and the story seems to be based more on recurring themes than a cohesive plot line. But who cares?! The real magic of the show lies in its two strong points: the characters and the music.

The characters are hilarious, and obviously a masterful fusion of great acting and clever writing. They are over the top, extreme, and purposefully cliché. Whenever any of the characters gets a section of internal dialogue in the show, it usually leaves me breathless with laughter.

The music is brilliant. Kudos to Fox for their continued clever use of iTunes that they started with American Idol. The cast covers songs from all genres and are unerringly original and 100% fun. I'm seriously impressed with all members of the cast. (Especially as it becomes apparent that ALL of the cast can sing, as Emma revealed in last week's episode). It makes me wish fervently that there had been a glee club in my high school.

So the plot is lacking...I really can't bring myself to care.
77 out of 141 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Season 3 was an upsetting disappointment
ChicagoisintheMIDWEST14 June 2012
Warning: Spoilers
As a fan of Season 1 Glee, I felt that Season 3 really dropped the ball. Dropped it like a hot potato. Here's my brief and humble opinion on why that happened.

Season 1 Glee was so new and and fun and funny because it was something we had never really seen before on television. Network executives probably scoffed at the idea that a campy musical television drama/comedy would make any money, but Ryan Murphy, Brad Falchuk, and Ian Brennan(along with others, of course) got the ball rolling. What resulted was one of the most successful and critically acclaimed series of the year.Glee was so revolutionary in terms of television presence as well as music sales and chart-topping songs, and no other show could boast that. I was a broke, miserable college student back then and this was one of the few shows that actually made me laugh and had me bopping my head to the beat of poppy, overrated mainstreams songs. The cast was exceptional not because they were experienced actors or anything (apart from the fabulous Jane Lynch), but they were fresh-faced, talented young people. Glee hit the jackpot with the amount of beauty and talent with the female cast. Male cast, not so much. They were adequate, and talented to a certain degree, but with none of the well-roundedness and charisma that practically radiates from Lea Michele, Jenna Ushkowitz, Dianna Agron, or Heather Morris. This show addressed a lot of issues, especially in regards to homosexuality, and I appreciated that. Season 1 was golden.

Then Season 2 happened. And it sort of just seemed... there. Like the 3 overworked writers finally realized that they had a hit on their hands and had to scramble to put together a somewhat coherent plot, which they did. But not before destroying almost all the characterization of a lot of key characters from Season 1. They were juggling plot lines for 14 leads, so of course mistakes were going to be made. There were people who shined (Santana, Brittany, Kurt, Rachel), but then there were the people who were ignored (Tina, Mercedes, Mike). The second season was full of hit-and-miss moments that were bearable, but made fans like me just that much more indifferent.

And then there was the debacle that was Season 3, which suffered from lower ratings, media criticism and backlash, and fan abandonment. And I can't defend the show, but I can defend the actors. Because there are legitimate fans of the cast but not the show. I know I will definitely follow Lea Michele's and Dianna Agron's careers after this is canceled (which it most likely will be). It's the writers and producers who have dropped the ball, and boy have they dropped it hard. Ryan Murphy and Brad Falchuk clearly have moved on to create American Horror Story (a successful and intriguing show in its own right), and, like the divorced dad who sometimes stops in on important holidays and birthdays to drop off money or mediocre gifts, pay little attention to the tempest of suck that goes on in the writers' room. And Season 3, to reflect that, was a storm of mediocrity. The show is a reflection of the clumsy and crossing-the-line offensiveness that you get when you throw newbie/untalented/plain lazy writers who clearly did not do their homework in a room together. It's like they got together, watched Mean Girls, pigged out on popcorn and hot dogs, and then in the last few minutes just passed around a piece of paper titled "Write whatever the hell you want" and called it a script. Can't blame the actors for all those rumors about wanting to leave, this is a sinking ship, no iceberg required.

Anyway, I digress. Glee Season 3 further destroyed all of the characterization of Golden Age Glee (is it too early to use that term? I don't think it can get any worse...) and plunged itself into the pits of hell. This was not the show that made my day a little brighter on those horrible exam nights (along with HIMYM). It takes a special kind of misguided ignorance to write "I Kissed a Girl" or "The First Time", among others. This time around, the misses overwhelmed the hits, and for this fan, I'm sorry, but you lost me. I'm actually kind of sad that I wasted this much time on Season 3, but I'm more dismayed that a show with so much potential and so many talented cast members was marred by terrible writing and producing. It's a damn shame.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
It's only fair to give it a chance!
ruby-wells76417 January 2014
'Glee' may not be everyone's cup of tea, but in my opinion, it's a great feel-good teen comedy. The casting is without a doubt great, and each member brings something individual to the show - Lea Michele does an especially great job in her role as Rachel. I also think that the musical numbers add another dimension to the show - they are often fun and done well, and I think they are a good way of introducing many aspects of music to the younger generation... I like the way that this show deals with a wide range of different issues, such as bullying, loss, homosexuality and the various kinds of pressure that many teens face today. I would say that the only thing that lets down the show in places is an occasionally over-cheesy script - I think that some of the more emotional scenes have been slightly tainted by over-doing it a little on the dialogue front.

Overall, though, I have really enjoyed watching this show and at times I have found myself getting quite involved with the characters and their journeys - however I wouldn't recommend it for the cynical amongst us - you might find it quite tiresome...
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Please, change the channel.
ktkite16 September 2009
Does anyone remember 'Cop Rock'? No? It was something along the lines of 'Glee' in that it tried to combine a few good ideas in a horrible, horrible bastard child of a TV show. 'Cop Rock' was a combo of 'Hill Street Blues' with 'Fame'. The boys in blue were singing and dancing while booking the bad guys. I think it had an impressive run of a whopping three episodes. 'Glee', like 'Cop Rock' sucks too. This show tries to combine '90210', 'Desperate Housewives', 'Fame', and a number of other marginal shows into one. It includes drama, humor, talent, and human interest in to a tight little package that fails miserably. Sure, it would be good if it were half of those things, but it is seriously too much which makes it a train wreck which is (oddly enough) impossible to watch. I actually feel sorry for the talented actors who signed on for this and hope they can recover from this debacle of as television show.
76 out of 149 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Entertaining feel-good dramedy; wild, like a small-town cousin of "The O.C." -- with singing!
Jimmy L.31 October 2009
"Glee" is a high school comedy (dramedy?) filled with music and choreography. It follows the students and faculty surrounding a high school glee club. The show exploits high school stereotypes (the popular jocks and cheerleaders, the "losers" interested in music clubs, the dumb athlete, the flamboyant homosexual, etc.), while preaching a "be yourself" and "follow your dreams" message. There are some emotions, but much of the show is light-hearted fun.

I was reluctant to watch "Glee" because I'm not particularly into musical theater. I finally checked it out and it's become something of a guilty pleasure. It's a good show, well-made and entertaining. I can see how the program is popular. I imagine it would be a hit with younger demographics (mostly female?). Audiences can relate to the high school experience (fitting in, stress, dating and relationships, the usual). Younger viewers might find the show inspirational at times. "Glee" showcases a less glamorous crowd than shows like "Gossip Girl" or "The O.C." before it, and the crazy story lines are less heavy on drama. Overall, the show is pretty family-friendly, although there are sexual references.

Another attraction of the show is its music. Each episode is peppered with musical numbers performed by the cast. Singing, dancing, the works. They cover pop hits of yesterday and today. The writers sneak these numbers into the script in two ways: when the glee club is rehearsing or performing a routine and when a character is singing out his or her emotions. In the case of the latter, the singing does not "occur" within the reality of the show; it's used to emphasize the feelings inside the character. The show attempts to avoid the old method of spontaneously breaking out in song.

The cast members are all talented singers (to varying degrees) and many are accomplished musical theater performers. The performances are all great, with the singers belting it out and rocking the house. I can see fans of "American Idol" liking "Glee". TV viewers are really into vocalization nowadays. Personally I could do without some of the singing. I know that's the gimmick of the show, but I think it slows down the plot and I tend to be more interested in the story. But I can't deny that the performances are impressive.

The show is not "realistic", but I don't think it strives to be. It's silly sugar-coated escapism. In the "Glee" universe, endings tend to be happy and people learn valuable lessons. There's angst and tension, but no real heavy tragedy or anything. It's a more light-hearted show. And the show is pretty silly. Not to be mistaken for realism. (Teachers forming a boy band? Football players dancing on the field to Beyoncé?) Any character in the show can prove to be a singing and dancing dynamo. Each passing episode seems to expose another student or faculty member as a musical talent.

And all of the characters are given interesting quirks and background stories, just for fun. There's Rachel, the aspiring star, busy showcasing her vocal talent on MySpace, raised by a gay couple and ridiculed by the pom-pom crowd. There's the guidance counselor with her extreme germaphobia and OCD-like obsession with cleaning things. The crazy wife, desperate to get pregnant and always thinking of her own interests. The cheerleading coach (played superbly by Jane Lynch), who constantly exercises and claims, among other things, to have been in the special forces. One student runs a pool-cleaning business so he can seduce mothers.

The premise of "Glee" is this: A Spanish teacher takes over the high school glee club and wants to return it to its past prestige. He assembles a small but talented group of social outcasts. Then there's the football star who harbors a secret passion for singing. When he joins the club, he has his feet in opposite ends of the high school caste system: the jocks and the geeks. (Breaking down barriers...) Lynch plays the villain, the cheerleading coach unwilling to share the spotlight (or school funding) with an upstart music club. Meanwhile, there's romantic tension between faculty members (one a married man!) and between the football player (dating a cheerleader) and one of the glee "losers".

The show is not really my style and some of the jokes are only so-so, but "Glee" is entertaining nonetheless. Jane Lynch's sly wit is easily the funniest part, but there's also the show-stopping musical numbers and all that feel-good stuff about teenagers overcoming adolescent pressures. The show also keeps you interested in the subplots (love triangles, romances, scandals, etc.) and makes you pull for the good guys and root against the bad guys. It's wild, like a small-town cousin of "The O.C.", with singing. Sure, it paints a sunnier (and crazier, and more theatrical) portrait of modern teenage life and the world outside, but it's good clean fun and it makes you feel good inside. It's not very deep, but it targets the sentimentality in its viewers. I'm surprised how much I've warmed up to the show.
41 out of 76 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Embarrassing to watch, don't you get that??
NeverAgain852 August 2010
This show is just plain awful,god awful. Its forced way too much, completely unrealistic. The characters and their interactions are plain fake and unrealistic. The dialog? It makes you wonder whether its a comedy or a drama,writers please make up your mind.

When the students break out into song,nearly every 5 minutes,it gives me goosebumps and makes me cringe,especially if there's someone else watching. I have to leave the room. I cant believe what I'm watching really. From my recollection,there was and episode in which the main lead character proves his love for his lady friend, while Sugababes "About you now" is playing,we're suppose to assume that this loves is going to last forever,and that were really suppose to like this guy for doing it. Thats OK. Next episode, nearly 5 minutes into it,he cheats on her straight away with another woman. And it has a comedic element to it?! what the hell? WHY the hell would he do that? and we're still suppose to like this guy? so basically the ending of the last episode lied to us? their love wasn't pure at all? everything seems very forced, and fake, and proves this by throwing away what happened in the garbage and forgetting about it in the next episode. Makes you think, "do I really care??"

This show is all over the place,i don't know how anyone can watch it. This is a craze TV show, and its right up there with Twilight. Hopefully this will be forgotten about in 5 years when the shows ended.
66 out of 130 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Glee. The obliteration of culture.
darkSPY66631 August 2011
Please help me out here because I'm completely bemused and dumbfounded. How the hell has this show won 'awards'? What on earth has happened to artistic culture when such a pile of turd is watched and adored by so many people that it wins an award? Has 'cheesy, awful singing' suddenly become art nouveau? Have 'terrible wooden acting' and 'vomit-inducing story lines' become the forefront of our viewing consumption? Let's face it, this show is total rubbish! Watched by confused, hormonal teens and adults who have no clue about real music, it decimates songs without mercy and pushes intellect to the gutter. Now we have The Glee Project, which not only further insults the integrity of true musicians, but also allows the brats who love this nonsense to be embroiled into it's web of repulsive so-called entertainment. Don't be sucked into this money making vortex of cultural destruction, it will only serve to let the producers deliver even more of this abominable trash into our living rooms.
53 out of 103 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Probably the worst thing I've ever been subjected to
maax485 April 2011
I just watched an episode of that as a make-weight to get the girlfriend to watch Empire Strikes Back. Not worth even that. That was comfortably the worst thing I've ever seen in my life.

The character are all massively unlikable and impossible to sympathise with, and the songs are so corny it makes me sick. They took songs I really like and butchered them mercilessly. Anyone who says it's getting kids to like older music, that's pure garbage - it's simply redoing them in a format which idiotic kids enjoy, with minimal referencing that originals ever existed. If a show ever wanted to get kids to be fans of older, classic rock and pop music, it would be about kids who enjoy older music in its original form (see Freaks and Geeks).

It's essentially just High School Musical on television. It's highly unimaginative, and extremely annoying to any self-respecting fan of real music. It is simply helping fat-cats stuff their pockets with cash from stupid tweens (and stupider adults) who are fans, and is yet another example of the fetid toilet that the commercial music industry has become.

The scourge is still upon us, music lovers. Hopefully people will come to their senses in coming years and give us something good once more. Alternatively we could have all actors, dancers, choreographers, writers and directors of Glee burnt at the stake to lift the curse on music and rid the world of their evil (just kidding.....)
57 out of 112 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Terrible, just plain terriBAD.
Mark Glinka18 September 2009
I've been a show choir kid my ENTIRE life and I was born and raised in OHIO where the show takes place and I have never been embarrassed about it. After watching this show, I've never felt more embarrassed in my life. Don't get me wrong, the pilot showed A LOT of promise, I even enjoyed it, but after watching episodes two and three, I wanted to gouge my eyes out with a fork. This show is NOTHING what it's like to be in an Ohio show choir. I went to Olentangy High School in Lewis Center, OH and in our show choir, we really did have cheerleaders and football players on board and EVERYBODY supported EVERYBODY. I mean, our quarterback was the lead in our senior play for Christ's sake. Maybe the writer's should visit Olentangy High School and Teays Valley High School to see what show choir life in Ohio is REALLY about!! Key-what?!!! KEYNOTES!!!!
55 out of 108 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Watch at Your Own Risk, Men
Zeke17446 May 2011
Warning: Spoilers
After just viewing the first season of Glee I noticed the more I watched the less I liked it. It isn't so much the hopeless stereotyping but more about the emasculation of men. Kurt is a Hollywood version of the safe, marginalized gay character who's not so much gay as he is a hyper-effeminate girl wannabe. Straight boy Finn, likable dumb jock, comes home to an ambush. Mom's moved them in with Kurt and his dad and he is forced to share a bedroom with his manipulative stalker. When Finn fights back against Kurt's bordello-like redecorating of their bedroom Kurt's dad kicks him out of the house. By the end of the show Finn completely caves in, showing up at school in a dress and red-glitter eye liner to confront the football goons about to "redecorate" Kurt.

Finn can't be fully blamed, since a prime feature of every show has his mentor, glee club coach Mr. Schuester in a zombie-like stupor while being verbally shredded by cheerleader coach Sue. The only person with any real power, Sue is the master of this universe. She is the puppet master who controls the fate of everyone from the school principal to the music played on the intercom.

The daring social commentaries turn out to be fluff pieces. A recent episode has the "kids" confronting the dark secret they hide from others. Artie is crippled for life in a wheel-chair, but the thing that haunts him is he wears glasses. Really? And Mr. Shuester's only hidden shame is his dimpled chin? What a Ken doll.

The best and worst part is the music. Everything is so over-produced that even the talented Lea Michele must have her voice photo-shopped to perfection through computerized auto-tuning that makes everyone sound the same. I wonder what anyone really sounds like. But not that much. If the school were vaporized in a nuclear (or is that nucular) holocaust I only hope no one misses class.
13 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
I don't understand.
daveroy8 July 2010
I don't understand. Is this a documentary about how to mime really badly? If the actors are really the people singing, then why do they not try to make it look more realistic? On the occasions when I have this show on TV, I have it on in the background and listen to the music. If I look at the picture, I lose interest extremely quickly. I have been told it is a very funny show, but the funniest thing is the 'performers' 'performing'. Part of the problem could be that here in Australia, we don't go in for this sort of crap. And don't throw Olivia Newton-John at me. She was born in England, and has spent most of her life overseas. Barak Obama is more Australian than she is.
55 out of 110 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Good show, if you can put up with the manipulation and sexism.
hthbrr224 December 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Warning: Spoilers!

Don't get me wrong I watch this show and I more or less enjoy it (OK music/dancing/sometimes funny). BUT there are MAJOR flaws with it that make me give it one star. These are the bad plot lines and the rampant sexism.

Let's start with the set up. Each of these people cannot possibly exist in the real world. They are TOO extreme. Rachel is WAY too over the top. Finn is WAY too stupid. Britney is stupid but smart? What? That one girl PRETENDS to have a stutter? WTF!? These people would and should be in a mental institution. One song Mercedes did was about breaking a guys windows for not liking her! OK???? Insane much? Don't get me started on the insanity of that blond cheerleader that gets pregnant! She gives up the baby then wants her back? What? More insanity. The plot does not rely on sense making to move forward, just MANIPULATION! They twist you into believing these things. A character just does something so randomly and suddenly and you have to just BELIEVE them! What? The best shows are ones that have a sense making plot. That are believable. This show features people breaking into song and instruments just start playing from where??? Oh yes, we just have to BELIEVE this! OK if they just stuck with that I would say OK. But they are asking us to believe A LOT of crazy $#!t!!!

Now to the sexism. EVERY girl in this show wears skirts and dresses. What? Why? When I was in High School NO girl would wear a skirt or a dress UNLESS it was for a special occasion. When a girl wore a skirt or dress they would be asked "Why are you all dressed up?" It was so unusual! So why are all these girls wearing skirts/dresses EVERYDAY at school? Some have accused the FOX network of being run by conservatives. And some have gone further and accused them of being a government run station. It would fit since most republicans/religious people/Christians have the belief that women are not to wear pants. Some religions go to the extreme point of banning women from wearing pants! I've even heard of some restaurants that will refuse service if a woman is wearing pants. SEXIST!

These reasons are why it gets 1 star. It's like if you have a nice neighbor that is very quiet and organized but then you find out they are a child molester. They are now just pure evil. Who cares what they do? At the core they are rotten. So I don't care about the music and can't reward any effort this show makes to teach us "acceptance" when it can't accept pants on women. Sure sex sells, but these are supposed to be teenagers and most of the time the skirts are so short I can see their underwear! They are hypocrites! The ONLY girls that wear pants consistently are Mercedes and Lauren: the obese girls! Because "eww cover it up" right? What about acceptance!? No this show cares more about ratings! DISGUSTING!!!!
19 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
This show points out an intense sadness...
vagabondjonson10 December 2010
I worry that other countries watch programs like this and think that it is indicative of American culture. The problem is, this show isn't satire. It isn't lampooning anything. They're actually representing that doing bad is "not recycling" and doing good is refraining from telling ridiculously dramatic and emotional people that they're idiots. The clichés in this show go beyond simple cliché to the point of being a political cartoon. Boys are are simply dogs with huge genitals with the words "sole motivation" tattooed on them, girls are represented by bear traps chained to a big metal ball that has "needless drama" chiseled into it, and homosexuals are represented by a "Martyr" brand bottle of maple syrup with a big "Can do no wrong" slogan underneath their name, and all of these things are jumping up for a brass ring that says "Popularity" on it. I used to teach and if a girl in my class came up and said, "I feel the need to express myself, I would have advised her that she was absolutely free to do that after class on her own time." And if you play football and you throw a slushy in an Asian girl's face because she's in glee club, I might not be able to get you expelled but I guarantee, you would be my bitch for the rest of the year. And if you threaten to kill a gay kid because he's gay, I might not be able to get you expelled but, again, you'd be my bitch for the rest of the year. I really like Jane Lynch and the musical numbers are entertaining at times but gosh this show is awful. I've come away from the episodes I've seen just feeling frustrated that this is a cultural phenomenon.
37 out of 71 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Fun! Can't wait for more!
harryjohnson200817 July 2009
I'm not a professional reviewer, nor will I pretend to be like some people who review here. Just a regular guy who really enjoyed watching the pilot for Glee. Yes, there are a few stereotyped characters. When will Hollywood "update" their stereotypes? I'm pretty sure that with shows like American Idol, it's considered "cool" if you can sing like these kids can. So I'm hoping the writers of this show will work out some of these stereotypes and the characters will develop. Overall it was nice entertainment with some GREAT songs. Those kids can sing!! I actually re-played a couple of the songs they sang, jut because they did such a great job. And with Jane Lynch in the cast, you know the show is going to be good! Can't wait for the rest of the season to start this fall.
56 out of 114 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
A gross miscalculation.
Jill Piper5 September 2012
First of all, the show itself is just awful. It disgusts me that so many people buy into this. The show itself desperately tries to preach to people about 'being themselves,' yet they're constantly showcasing 'different people' getting doused with slushies by popular kids. Makes sense, right? The writing is just atrocious. Absolutely awful. No doubt the worst writing I've ever seen on a television show. They use the musical numbers as cushions to cover the plot holes they can't cover themselves. Often, a problem is solved with a simple musical number. How can we convince Puck that having a baby is a good idea... musical number! How can we convince Wade that it's okay for him to cross-dress... musical number! How can we convince Karofsky not to kill himself... musical number! You guys get the point. The situations and resolutions are so unrealistic, it's disgusting. This doesn't happen in real life, most of the plot is completely implausible. To add insult to injury, the music selection is terrible. It's all either taken directly from the Top 100 chart at the time or the greatest hits of a recently dead celebrity; and about that, they're completely soulless with no regret, pawning off the misfortune of others. On top of that, 'New Directions' itself is completely unrealistic. At first I thought, maybe the musical numbers are like dream sequences, or they're just imagining the big set-ups, lights, costumes, while just singing. But no, it's actually 'happening.' Yes, the characters step into a room that's completely made up and decorated, with back up dancers, elaborate outfits, and the band that they have completely at their disposal, who can apparently play any song you could ever imagine. The club has unfathomable budgets, of which no school would ever fund, or allow, for that matter. The overly-dramatic aspect of the show is enough to make you vomit. Everything is a f--king soap opera with these writers, no one can ever just have a normal day. The 'comedy' is non-existent. Here's something funny! I've noticed countless one-liners stolen directly from the original Fame. For example: "That's vocal masturbation." Can you believe that? It's a wonder they make a profit off of this. Fox must be marketing wizards.
23 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews

Recently Viewed