6.4/10
8
1 user 1 critic

President Hollywood (2008)

Jonathan Freedland shows how 2008's race for the White House was run before on 'The West Wing', and argues that the relationship between on-screen art and political life isn't new.

Director:

Janette Ballard
Reviews

Photos

Add Image Add an image

Do you have any images for this title?

Edit

Cast

Credited cast:
Jonathan Freedland Jonathan Freedland ... Self - Presenter
Rest of cast listed alphabetically:
Eli Attie Eli Attie ... Self
Tad Devine Tad Devine ... Self
Ken Duberstein ... Self
Geoff Garin Geoff Garin ... Self
Wynton Hall Wynton Hall ... Self
Mary Jordan Mary Jordan ... Self
Rod Lurie ... Self
Stryker McGuire Stryker McGuire ... Self (as Stryker Maguire)
Lawrence O'Donnell ... Self (as Lawrence O'Donnell Jr.)
Jennifer Palmieri Jennifer Palmieri ... Self
Joe Queenan Joe Queenan ... Self
David Schwartz ... Self
Jimmy Smits ... Self
Edit

Storyline

Jonathan Freedland reveals how 2008's dramatic race for the White House was run before on 'The West Wing'. The TV series held an election between a charismatic, non-white Democrat called Matt Santos and an appealing, experienced Republican Arnold Vinick; two candidates remarkably similar to Barack Obama and John McCain. Freedland argues that the relationship between on-screen art and political life is nothing new. Both Hollywood and Washington have been exerting their power and influence over the image of the presidency for nearly a century.

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis

Plot Keywords:

two word title | See All (1) »

Genres:

Documentary

User Reviews

A bit too populist to be really engaging or insightful but a reasonably entertaining little documentary despite the weaknesses
8 February 2009 | by bob the mooSee all my reviews

Assuming that a) you are outside the UK and b) anyone is actually reading this, it is worth starting this review with a little introduction to the channel that showed this documentary. With the tagline "everyone needs somewhere to think", BBC4 has generally done two things. The first is to produce interesting films with a cultural value and something to say that does make it different from other channels and get closest to being the channel that most justifies the use of the license fee. Unsurprising perhaps the second thing it has generally done is fail to get many viewers. The reason I mention this is that it is a fair expectation that a documentary on BBC4 will be worth watching and that sentiment is relevant here because President Hollywood is barely that – it is a film that could easily have been made for any channel.

It is not the idea that is bad though because that is interesting on the face of it. The relevance of the media in regards the Presidency is unquestionable in this recent campaign (the film was made before the election while the winner was still to be decided by American voters) and this film offers something along those lines by seeing how reality and Hollywood have both influenced one another down the years. It starts with the West Wing and the way that Jimmy Smits character was based on Obama and the way that the fictional character would parallel the path the man himself would take before the film then steps back with the roots of the idealised President as seen in films. This part makes good points as it highlights where things have perhaps grown from and how the campaigns have mirrored this perception, feeding it and making it become a reality and norm (morally pure, humble background, Washington outsider etc). It then goes further, tracing the changes in Hollywood's presentation and linking it to key events such as Nixon, Clinton, 11th September etc. All potentially very insightful, interesting stuff that could appeal to a larger audience by being based in popular culture as a subject.

Problem is that the documentary is far too populist and seems to have more clips than anything else. At a quite lean 60 minutes (for what it covers) the film could have benefited from being another 30 minutes longer and using that extra time for more discussion and insight and fewer clips. As it is the film makes mostly general points that, while valid are nothing that amazing or insightful – they are not quite "well, duh" moments but they are nothing that surprising either. It is a shame because I had hoped for more but it isn't really there. Don't get me wrong though, the weaknesses disappoint but they do not destroy the film. The recognisable clips and generally interesting points do make it serve as an accessible, unchallenging and entertaining documentary – that doesn't inform a great deal but makes you feel like it is while also delivering clips of movies and show many viewers will recognise.


4 of 4 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you? | Report this
Review this title | See one user review »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.
Edit

Details

Country:

UK

Language:

English

Release Date:

15 September 2008 (UK) See more »

Company Credits

Production Co:

BBC Northern Ireland See more »
Show more on IMDbPro »

Technical Specs

Color:

Color
See full technical specs »

Contribute to This Page



Recently Viewed