74 user 5 critic

Pathfinders: In the Company of Strangers (2011)

Not Rated | | Action, Drama, History | 11 January 2011 (USA)
1:42 | Trailer
Three companies of paratroopers travel in a deadly mission to France to prepare the drop zone for the airborne attack on the D-Day. They have to install an Eureka transmitter and searchlight to guide the planes in the Normandy invasion.







Cast overview, first billed only:
Christopher Serrone ... Captain McRoberts
... Eddie
Philip De Lorenzo ... Francis
Kyle Erickson ... Paratrooper 1-.30 caliber
Ryan Findley ... First Lieutenant
Eric V. Jones ... Second Lieutenant (as Eric Jones)
Dan Limb ... Doc (as Daniel Limb)
Billy Reynolds ... Rigs
Allen Thompson ... Jerrard
Jeremiah Allen ... Henry The Boxer
Bram Davidson ... Light Operator
Chad Francis ... German Sentry
Zachary Davidson ... First Light Operator
Hans Eleveld ... Pickles
Jon Ashley Hall ... The Major (as Jonathan Hall)


Untold and lost history. A true story of the American Pathfinders, the volunteer paratroopers whose deadly mission was to land 30 minutes before the Normandy invasion, locate and mark strategic "drop zones" and set up the top-secret navigation equipment needed to guide the main airborne assault on D-Day. Written by Charlie Armstrong

Plot Summary | Plot Synopsis


Behind enemy lines, alone, with a single mission. See more »


Action | Drama | History | War


Not Rated | See all certifications »


Official Sites:

Official site



Release Date:

11 January 2011 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

Anihneftes  »


Box Office


$50 (estimated)
See more on IMDbPro »

Company Credits

Show more on  »

Technical Specs



See  »

Did You Know?


The outdoor set being used for this film is one of the largest outdoor sets built in independent film history. It was designed to maximize both speed of production and cinematographic perfection. See more »


Gliders and single and twin-engined Allied aircraft participating in the Normandy invasion were marked with invasion or "Overlord" stripes, which were 3 white and 2 black alternating stripes on the wings and rear fuselage. The stripes on the fuselage were vertical with the center white stripe aligned with the white star on national insignia of the US aircraft. In this movie, the C-47 transports had their fuselage stripes with the rearward black stripe aligned with the star. See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

Badly Botched Effort
10 April 2011 | by See all my reviews

I'm probably in the minority here but I found this film to be a steaming pile of "could have". It could have been better, it could have used a bigger budget, it could have used a better director and better actors. And most of all it could have used a better cinematographer.

From the very start of the film it's pretty obvious that this is an extremely low budget effort for the extremely ambitious story they are trying to tell. And unfortunately this just is NOT done well. I've seen lo-budget war pictures before that ended up being extremely effective. In the main they used a fairly limited number of sets and actors and tried to tell "smaller" stories. Pathfinders is an attempt to tell a very large story on a shoestring.

The opening of the movie has a woman singing a song that sounds nothing like a period piece. The wardrobe is just barely up from Halloween costume quality. And the acting is stiff and phony. And it doesn't get any better. Hiring a bunch of amateur hour actors so that you can spend most of your limited budget trying (unsuccessfully) to make your film look authentic is a bad bad idea.

Another irritating thing is the very initial premise of the movie. The use of Pathfinders before the D-Day invasion has been a secret for 60 years. HUH??? Secret from who for crying out loud? Anyone with even a passing interest in WW2 history knows that. It may well be true that nobody made a movie about just that exact facet of D-Day before but it sure as hell hasn't been a secret for 60 years. Pathfinders are at least mentioned in several films, including The Longest Day.

Despite all of the shortcomings of the film, my biggest gripe is with the camera work. Why the heck are there so many needless closeups? Are they trying to hide the shoddy quality of the sets and wardrobe? Honestly this is not the worst film I've ever seen. If it was just a low budget effort with some shortcomings I'd probably give it a 5 or 6 out of 10 rating. BUT it's a movie that never should have been made for this kind of budget! There are some things you just cannot pull off successfully without money. And the people behind this film would have done a lot better if they had tried to work within budget limitations. Ignoring the small budget and trying to do it anyway is just a case of stupidity and arrogance.

3 out of 10.

31 of 41 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you? | Report this
Review this title | See all 74 user reviews »

Contribute to This Page

Stream Trending TV Series With Prime Video

Explore popular and recently added TV series available to stream with Prime Video.

Start your free trial