Accepting a prize, architect Georg Winter explains that an architect has the good fortune of measuring every completed building against the rightness of his original idea. Soon Georg ...
See full summary »
The architect Daniel Brenner is in his late thirties when he receives his first challenging and lucrative commission: to design a cultural center for a satellite town in East-Berlin. He ... See full summary »
Martha is in a happy relationship with Paul. She shares her life with him, and she trusts him and feels she knows him inside out. But one day two policewomen appear at her door and suddenly... See full summary »
A portrait of Rita, who claims that her mother was never a mother for her. Rita gives birth to her own six children and forces her mother to take the role of a mother for her grandchildren as she never did that for Rita.
East Fresia 1401: the era of the feared sea pirates Klaus Störtebeker and Gödeke Michels is coming to an end. After a long period with no booty at last a bulging ship appears on the horizon... See full summary »
Accepting a prize, architect Georg Winter explains that an architect has the good fortune of measuring every completed building against the rightness of his original idea. Soon Georg himself is forced to take stock of the achievements and mistakes he has made in his personal life. An intense drama in which the four members of the family travel to a mountain village to bury Georg's mother. They get stranded in bad weather. This unexpected isolation throws new light on the past and present life of the parents and the two almost-adult children.Written by
Warsaw Film Festival
Actually, awful doesn't even begin to describe how bad this film is. It's not the campy kind of bad that eventually turns good, but a complete piece of garbage utterly devoid of any taste and/or morale.
Being an architect myself, I only wanted to see it because the title made me believe that it would have something to do with architecture. It didn't. In fact, the titular character could have just as well been a banker, a lawyer or a butcher, for that matter. Why anyone insisted on him being an architect and then going that far to even name the film after his profession is way beyond me.
Now I regret resisting the urge to switch it off after the first 20 minutes or so, because I honestly believed that it would somehow begin to make some sense until the end. Instead, I irreversibly wasted a good hour and a half of my life I could have spent way more productively, like staring at en empty wall, per instance.
To sum it up: this film has absolutely nothing to do with architecture. It could be classified as a family drama, but the purpose of its existence escapes me. If it tried to convey a message, it failed; if it tried to shock, it failed (nice try though); if it tried to be poetic, it failed miserably.
Anyone who wants to see a quality drama with a strong story, good acting and remotely plausible event development, should avoid it at any cost.
2 of 7 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?
| Report this