In this Brazilian documentary supposed to boost critical thought about new protests by activists in different parts of the world "against tradicional politics", we can see good footage about extremely heterogeneous demonstrations (not only ideologically - from anti-neoliberalism to racist far-right extremism - and culturally, but also in the level of police violence). However, the irregular choices of the interviewees, with varied qualities of their statements and explanations, made it far from providing a coherent understanding (or at least to avoid serious misunderstandings). While Juan Carlos Monedero and Jacques Rancière provided deep reflexions and insights, useful and critical, the same cannot be stated about most of other "experts". Esther Solano and historian Aguiar have moderately good, but somewhat vague, contributions. Steven Levitsky did what he always does: blamed polarization, calling as "populists" all those who are not neoliberal (and even criticizing that fascists be called "fascists") and talking about the dangers democracy faces while he is indeed concerned about protecting oligarchies (I am a political scientist and I have discussed this elsewhere). Angela Alonso has mostly repeated conventional wisdom and did not add anything expected from a scholar. The worst choice by producers by far, however, has been Luiz Felipe Pondé. Besides not being a serious researcher, why the hell calling a notorious elitist adversary of any democracy to spread his disgusting views against popular participation (portrayed as stupid)? Belisario Franca obviously wanted to show a diversified set of academicians, but there are necessary limits which he was unable to identify.