When Cecilia's abusive ex takes his own life and leaves her his fortune, she suspects his death was a hoax. As a series of coincidences turn lethal, Cecilia works to prove that she is being hunted by someone nobody can see.
The film follows Cecilia, who receives the news of her abusive ex-boyfriend's suicide. She begins to re-build her life for the better. However, her sense of reality is put into question when she begins to suspect her deceased lover is not actually dead.Written by
Max
In the 1933 film's sequel The Invisible Man Returns (1940), Griffin's brother is named Frank. Here, he is named Tom (a reference to the character Thomas Marvel, Griffin's assistant from the original novel). See more »
Goofs
There is no explanation as to why Cecilia never requested to see a death certificate and coroner's report to verify that Adrian was truly dead after the mysterious incidents began to occur. See more »
Quotes
Cecilia Kass:
[as Cecilia leaves Adrian's house in the middle of the night, she sees Adrian's dog, Zeus]
Zeus, I'm sorry. I can't take you with me. I'm sorry. Shit.
[referring to his shock collar]
Cecilia Kass:
I'm not going to leave you with that thing on. Okay. Come here.
[as she tries to remove the collar]
Cecilia Kass:
It's okay. Good boy. There you go.
[as she removes the collar, Zeus bumps into Adrian's car, setting off the alarm]
See more »
Crazy Credits
The Universal Pictures logo appears in silence. See more »
Alternate Versions
The UK version was cut to secure a 15 certificate, by removing 3s of bloody injury detail in a scene of self-harm. See more »
The Invisible Man ... hmmmm. Well, it wasn't awful, but it wasn't great. I still don't understand what house she went to, her relationship with the two people that live there, and why it never occurs to her to use the camera on her phone to record video for evidence.
In today's world, films really need to go out of their way to explain a LACK of smartphone use. They are so prevalent that NOT using them is a plot hole, and not a small one. It really kind of irritates me.
There is one legit good jump scare and some good tense moments. But for the most part it just feels like a real wasted opportunity.
I hate to say it, but Hollow Man did it better.
349 of 682 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?
| Report this
The Invisible Man ... hmmmm. Well, it wasn't awful, but it wasn't great. I still don't understand what house she went to, her relationship with the two people that live there, and why it never occurs to her to use the camera on her phone to record video for evidence.
In today's world, films really need to go out of their way to explain a LACK of smartphone use. They are so prevalent that NOT using them is a plot hole, and not a small one. It really kind of irritates me.
There is one legit good jump scare and some good tense moments. But for the most part it just feels like a real wasted opportunity.
I hate to say it, but Hollow Man did it better.