Alice, an unpretentious and individual 19-year-old, is betrothed to a dunce of an English nobleman. At her engagement party, she escapes the crowd to consider whether to go through with the marriage and falls down a hole in the garden after spotting an unusual rabbit. Arriving in a strange and surreal place called "Underland," she finds herself in a world that resembles the nightmares she had as a child, filled with talking animals, villainous queens and knights, and frumious bandersnatches. Alice realizes that she is there for a reason--to conquer the horrific Jabberwocky and restore the rightful queen to her throne.Written by
Jim Beaver <email@example.com>
Although Jabberwocky is the title of a poem in Through the Looking-Glass, the monster is called simply "Jabberwock" in the text. This is changed for the movie. See more »
When the Mad Hatter recites Lewis Carroll's poem "Jabberwocky," he correctly names of the beast "Jabberwock." Every other mention uses the incorrect name, "Jabhberwocky," which is the name of the poem itself. Not the beast. Because of this inconsistency, it is an error by IMDB standards. See more »
Charles, you have lost your senses? This picture is impossible.
Precisely. Gentlemen, the only way to achieve the impossible, is to believe it's possible.
See more »
In the opening credits the Cheshire Cat can be seen smiling in the form of a cloud overlaying the moon. See more »
String Quartet Op. 1, No. 2 in E-Flat, 2nd movement: Minuet
Music by Joseph Haydn
KPM Music Ltd See more »
Not what you would expect from a Johnny Deep picture
When I decided to pay a premium price for a 3D blockbuster I expected a memorable picture. Besides the fact that Johnny Deep plays a great role as usual and H.B. Carter also has a nice performance the overall plot is dull and static. I believe that because they had to "improvise" and write a new story continuing the original one, the quality of the screenplay and plot decreased significantly. Although there are some funny moments and well written lines for the main characters, many of the others pass by unnoticed. Overall it was a nice, entertaining flick with average 3D effects, way below Avatar, and a simple,uncomplicated plot. Also it was rather short since I expected 120 minutes at least and not 100. Finally I would this movie performed below my expectations. A 7/10 would be a fair grade in my honest opinion.
36 of 72 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?
| Report this