Patterns of Evidence: Moses Controversy
Original title: Patterns of Evidence: The Moses Controversy
IMDb RATING
6.7/10
164
YOUR RATING
A filmmaker searches for scientific evidence that Moses wrote the first books of the Bible.A filmmaker searches for scientific evidence that Moses wrote the first books of the Bible.A filmmaker searches for scientific evidence that Moses wrote the first books of the Bible.
Photos
Timothy P. Mahoney
- Self
- (as Tim Mahoney)
Storyline
Featured review
Firstly, I appreciate Timothy Mahoney's approach in this documentary. He mentions very clearly at the start that he is troubled by the growing consensus that Moses did not write the Torah. His conviction and passion for seeking out the truth for himself is truly inspirational. He has every right to go on a journey to discover if what he was taught as a child was untrue.
Secondly, to do with the analysis itself- i found it refreshing that he does not go into the interviews with a per-conceived idea. Instead, he is merely asking the scholars who hold strongly to the non-Moses authorship to explain their views. And he publishes their responses rather than edit it out. One can clearly see that he interviews scholars that agree and do not agree with him- and what both parties say are shown.
Thirdly, while i was expecting any American documentary on the Bible to be openly one sided, Mahoney, i felt, was approaching it from an evidential and scholarly perspective. He does not jump to conclusions without seeing what the evidence he finds is actually saying. Once the evidence is found and is examined, one is able to use their intelligence and perception to connect the dots. Mahoney does connect the dots (he calls them patterns) and he discovers something interesting.
Overall, this is definitely worth a watch. It is a well made documentary and the only bias i can see is the conviction of the film-maker who is trying to make sense of where the truth lies when it comes to something he has treasured since childhood.
Secondly, to do with the analysis itself- i found it refreshing that he does not go into the interviews with a per-conceived idea. Instead, he is merely asking the scholars who hold strongly to the non-Moses authorship to explain their views. And he publishes their responses rather than edit it out. One can clearly see that he interviews scholars that agree and do not agree with him- and what both parties say are shown.
Thirdly, while i was expecting any American documentary on the Bible to be openly one sided, Mahoney, i felt, was approaching it from an evidential and scholarly perspective. He does not jump to conclusions without seeing what the evidence he finds is actually saying. Once the evidence is found and is examined, one is able to use their intelligence and perception to connect the dots. Mahoney does connect the dots (he calls them patterns) and he discovers something interesting.
Overall, this is definitely worth a watch. It is a well made documentary and the only bias i can see is the conviction of the film-maker who is trying to make sense of where the truth lies when it comes to something he has treasured since childhood.
- funkifizied
- Jul 2, 2021
- Permalink
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Also known as
- Patterns of Evidence: The Moses Controversy
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Gross US & Canada
- $765,361
- Opening weekend US & Canada
- $217,327
- Mar 17, 2019
- Gross worldwide
- $765,361
- Runtime2 hours 20 minutes
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content
Top Gap
By what name was Patterns of Evidence: Moses Controversy (2019) officially released in Canada in English?
Answer