Doctor Who (2005– )
7.0/10
4,639
10 user 7 critic

Daleks in Manhattan 

The Doctor and Martha travel to New York in 1930, where people have been mysteriously vanishing from the streets, and an old enemy resurfaces.

Director:

James Strong

Writers:

Helen Raynor, Terry Nation (characters: "Daleks")
Reviews

Watch Now

With Prime Video

ON DISC
ALL

Photos

Edit

Cast

Episode cast overview, first billed only:
David Tennant ... The Doctor
Freema Agyeman ... Martha Jones
Miranda Raison ... Tallulah
Ryan Carnes ... Laszlo
Hugh Quarshie ... Solomon
Andrew Garfield ... Frank
Eric Loren ... Mr. Diagoras / Dalek Sec
Flik Swan Flik Swan ... Myrna
Alexis Caley ... Lois
Earl Perkins Earl Perkins ... Man #1
Peter Brooke ... Man #2
Ian Porter ... Foreman
Joe Montana ... Worker #1
Stewart Alexander ... Worker #2
Mel Taylor Mel Taylor ... Dock Worker
Edit

Storyline

This is the first of a two part story, it is set in 1930's New York. The Doctor and Martha arrive in New York, there is, however, trouble as the Daleks return once again, this time attempting to create a Dalek/Human hybrid creature in the New York sewers! These two episodes also see the return of the Dalek Sec and the Cult of Skaro. Written by Brantyman

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis


Certificate:

TV-PG | See all certifications »

Parents Guide:

View content advisory »
Edit

Details

Country:

UK

Language:

English

Release Date:

21 April 2007 (UK) See more »

Filming Locations:

New York City, New York, USA

Company Credits

Show more on IMDbPro »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

| (50 episodes)

Sound Mix:

Dolby Digital (Dolby 5.1)

Color:

Color
See full technical specs »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

This episode takes place on November 1, 1930. See more »

Goofs

Set in November 1930 according to the newspaper found on the park bench. In one scene you look down on the Chrysler Building from the Empire building. However the Empire State Building did not get taller than the Chrysler Building until April 1931. See more »

Quotes

Dalek Caan: This day is ending. Humankind is weak; you shelter from the darkness. And yet... you have built all this.
Mr. Diagoras: That's progress. Gotta move with the times, or you get left behind.
Dalek Caan: My planet is gone. Destroyed in a Great War. Yet versions of this city stand throughout history. The human race always continues.
Mr. Diagoras: We've had wars. I've been a soldier myself, and I swore then I'd survive. No matter what.
Dalek Caan: You have rare ambition.
Mr. Diagoras: I'm gonna run this city, whatever it takes. By any means necessary.
Dalek Caan: You think ...
[...]
See more »

Connections

Featured in Doctor Who Confidential: A New York Story (2007) See more »

Soundtracks

Puttin' on the Ritz
(1929) (uncredited)
Written and Published by Irving Berlin
Performed by Harry Richman
See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
Daleks For The Sake Of It
21 July 2008 | by Theo RobertsonSee all my reviews

There's a common myth that DOCTOR WHO is " The show with the Daleks in it " . Yes the show did feature Daleks from 1963-1989 but Daleks aren't the be all and end all of the programme . In fact when you think about it the most highly regarded seasons among fans , five ( 1968 ) seven ( 1970 ) , thirteen (1975-76 ) and fourteen ( 1976-77 ) haven't featured any Dalek stories at all . The reverse is also true with stories such as The Chase , Death To The Daleks and Destiny Of The Daleks held in very low regard by the fans . It's somewhat annoying when producers bring back the Daleks for the sake of it and this certainly applies to this story .

It's not just the return of the Daleks that's so underdeveloped -it's the entire script which has a lack of thought . In fact there's something painfully inconsistent with every scene . For example Soloman ( This week's token black character )talks about his time in The Great War and the need for sticking together but seeing as the American army was segregated until 1947 would such a character be aware of a need to be sticking together ? It'd be more logical and credible if he was bitter and anti assimilation . In an early scene he takes back a loaf of bread that'd been stolen and breaks it in half and gives half of it to the rightful owner and the thief . Is that moral ? I guess because his name is Soloman there's a biblical reference there somewhere but again there's a lack of credibility , same as it's pushed down the viewers throat of how hungry and poverty stricken the people are in Central Park then when they'r offered a chance of work most of these unemployed , hungry and poverty stricken people turn it down

You also have to ask yourself why is it the Daleks have decided to locate to New York in 1930 ? Despite the poverty caused by the Wall Steet crash America was still a capitalist democracy with a free press and where people were allowed to ask questions . Wouldn't the Daleks have been better off in Hitler's Germany or Stalin's Soviet Union ? Indeed with the dubious success of Stalin's five year plans it would be far more logical to have set the story there and have the character of Diagoras as a high ranking commissar who doesn't tolerate dissent , but I guess Daleks In The Gulag doesn't have the same ring to it

Director James Strong does his very best with the weak material , but there's a fly in the ointment and that is the " Noo Yoirk accents " . They are absolutely terrible and a great distraction . Likewise much of the dialogue such as " Laszlo was da smartest guy oi ever dated " . Strong does however make sewers look like sewers which is not often the case in the history of the show ( Attack Of The Cybermen being an example ) and he does pace the impact aesthetic of the cliffhanger very well . It's just a pity that the Radio Times gave away the episode ending with a front page photo


22 of 36 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you? | Report this
Review this title | See all 10 user reviews »

Contribute to This Page



Recently Viewed