Individual freedom is the dream of our age. It's what our leaders promise to give us, it defines how we think of ourselves and, repeatedly, we have gone to war to impose freedom around the ...
See full synopsis »
Check out our breakdown of the movies and shows we're excited about this month, including "Lovecraft Country."
Related News
-
Bitter Lake – review: Adam Curtis’s beautiful, gripping film unravels a story of violence, bloodshed and bitter ironies
26 January 2015 | The Guardian - TV News -
Adam Curtis @ e-flux
20 March 2012 | MUBI -
Rewind TV: All Watched Over by Machines of Loving Grace; Strangeways – review
28 May 2011 | The Guardian - TV News
User Lists
Related lists from IMDb users
Share this Rating
Title: The Trap: What Happened to Our Dream of Freedom (2007)
Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.
Edit
Cast
Learn more
More Like This
All Watched Over by Machines of Loving Grace
(TV Mini-Series 2011)
Documentary
Stars:
Adam Curtis,
Stewart Brand,
Peder Anker
Documentary
|
History
Stars:
Gilles Kepel,
Melvin Goodman,
Stephen Holmes
Pandora's Box
(TV Mini-Series 1992)
Documentary
Stars:
George Ball,
Roy Adkin,
Abel G. Aganbegyan
Bitter Lake
(2015)
Documentary
Director:
Adam Curtis
Stars:
George Bush,
George W. Bush,
Joanne Herring
It Felt Like a Kiss
(2009)
Documentary
|
History
|
Music
Director:
Adam Curtis
Stars:
H. Rap Brown,
Nikita Khrushchev,
Richard Nixon
HyperNormalisation
(2016)
Documentary
Director:
Adam Curtis
Stars:
Adam Curtis,
Donald Trump,
Vladimir Putin
The Mayfair Set
(TV Mini-Series 1999)
Documentary
Stars:
James Goldsmith,
Tiny Rowland,
Jim Slater
Documentary
|
Biography
|
War
Directors:
Mark Achbar,
Peter Wintonick
Stars:
Noam Chomsky,
Mark Achbar,
Karin Aguilar-San Juan
Edit
Add Full Plot
|
Plot Synopsis
See All (12) »
Storyline
Individual freedom is the dream of our age. It's what our leaders promise to give us, it defines how we think of ourselves and, repeatedly, we have gone to war to impose freedom around the world. But if you step back and look at what freedom actually means for us today, it's a strange and limited kind of freedom.
Politicians promised to liberate us from the old dead hand of bureaucracy, but they have created an evermore controlling system of social management, driven by targets and numbers. Governments committed to freedom of choice have presided over a rise in inequality and a dramatic collapse in social mobility. And abroad, in Iraq and Afghanistan, the attempt to enforce freedom has led to bloody mayhem and the rise of an authoritarian anti-democratic Islamism. This, in turn, has helped inspire terrorist attacks in Britain. In response, the Government has dismantled long-standing laws designed to protect our freedom.
The Trap is a series of three films by Bafta-winning producer Adam ...
Plot Keywords:
tv mini series | political crime | evil politician | public relations | international relations |Taglines:
Human beings will always betray you. You can only trust the numbers.Genres:
DocumentaryParents Guide:
Add content advisory for parents »
Edit
James Strachan: It's the fact that the pressure to meet these targets is causing some NHS ...
[...]
See more »
Did You Know?
Quotes
Narrator: The original idea behind the mathematical system was that it would liberate public servants from old forms of bureaucratic control. Once they were given the targets, they were free to achieve them any way they wanted. But almost immediately, New Labour began to discover that people were more complex and devious than the simple model allowed. Public servants began to find the most ingenious ways of hitting their targets.James Strachan: It's the fact that the pressure to meet these targets is causing some NHS ...
[...]
See more »
Frequently Asked Questions
This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.
Edit
See full technical specs »
Details
Country:
UKLanguage:
EnglishRelease Date:
2007 (UK) See more »Also Known As:
Западня: Что сталось с мечтой о свободе? See more »Company Credits
Show more on
IMDbPro »
Technical Specs
Runtime:
(3 parts)Color:
ColorAspect Ratio:
1.78 : 1Looking for some great streaming picks? Check out some of the IMDb editors' favorites movies and shows to round out your Watchlist.
This series proposes a pair of arguments: That ( 1 ) the principles of Game Theory applied to domestic policy resulted in a loss of freedom and ( 2 ) the same principles applied to foreign policy, specifically in Iraq, caused Islamic extremism making the West a target for terrorists.
The second thesis contradicts historical facts. The invasion of Iraq took place in 2003. The destruction of the World Trade Center happened in 2001. The first attempt to destroy the same complex using a giant truck bomb, killing and injuring several, took place in 1992! The Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guards took the 50 American hostages in 1979.
Regarding personal liberty and the effect upon it of Game Theory, the argument is advanced via two tactics: avoiding difficult questions and the assertion as fact of contentions without evidence.
The film-maker repeatedly asserts that a central assumption of Game Theory is the self-interested behaviour of individuals. It is repeatedly asserted that this is a "bleak" vision, as though that bleakness were itself sufficient reason to reject it. Never once in the entire series is it asked whether this bleak vision is or is not correct! It is as though in the mind-set of this film-maker and his intended audience the mere undesirability of a thing is sufficient reason for us to regard it as not true! This is, indeed, instructive. It does explain a great deal about the behaviour and posturing of Western "intellectuals" who endorse freedom and the revolutionary pursuit of the liberation of oppressed and minorities yet who consistently support those movements and institutions that most obstruct such trends: previously the Soviet Union, today reactionary Islam.
As far as asserting facts unsubstantiated by evidence, the series contains numerous examples but one, in particular. It is asserted as a fact that a result of the widespread use of objective assessment and diagnostic criteria in psychiatry is that an entire generation of people took to applying such tests to themselves and as a result presented for psychiatric treatment of their behaviour. Thereby producing a self-imposed conformity effect. The only support for this assertion in the series is an anecdotal comment by a psychiatrist, in his office, that this was his personal observation. This clip is shown twice in the series. No other support for this contention is offered.
A contention, easily contradicted. Ask yourself, have you ever set yourself a formal diagnostic test for psychiatric disorder and gone to a doctor as a result? Do you know anyone in your family to have done that? Have you ever heard even indirectly of any person in your wider circle of associates who has done that? Have you ever before heard of such a thing at all? I have observed psychiatry throughout the entire three decades that the claim applies to. I have never come across such a bizarre assertion other than in this series.
If I try to argue the case for the assertion, I can only imagine that it refers to one of two things: The popularity of quizzes in magazines along the lines of "Take this months test to find out if you are a workaholic". Or the widespread phenomenon of the "worried well" who present at therapy for the treatment of non-existent conditions, in effect, life's dissatisfaction.
As far as the latter goes, it has been known for about a century that such "worried well" form the multitude of those who seek "therapy". Such behaviour has nothing whatever to do with either objective diagnostic criteria or Game Theory. Nor do such clients but rarely alter their behaviour in any significant way.
On the other hand, pop-quizzes of a self-questioning kind have been popular for almost as long as the kind of magazines that they appear in. A long time before the emergence of objective diagnostic criteria in psychiatry and owing nothing to either that or Game Theory.
I do not know if these are what the film-maker refers to but they offer no support for his contention that Western societies have become in some way self-straight-jacketed by conformity as a result. It seems, rather, that this is merely what he would like to believe, and hopes that by asserting it boldly, repeatedly and each time quickly passing on to something else, he will like an after-dinner illusionist convince us that something has happened that in reality has not! Only in the last few minutes of this series is any alternative vision to the "bleak" contention that Human behaviour is self-interested offered. It is that we...may...instead... assume... and act upon the ...assumption ...that Human Nature is capable of change! Not only is this a major contention, offered as an assumption without any supporting evidence, but it implicitly concedes that there is substance to the "bleak" contention, such that an "alternative" is warranted, whilst yet again dodging the real issue: is it or is it not true? The "retro" montage of archival material is edited for the most part according to principles of affective consonance or non-rational association. Images are mainly matched to the narrative according to the associations that they evoke, rather than to illustrate facts. Typical is the repeated use of a pairing of reference to post-war ideals of personal freedom with what appears to be a snippet from a film of housewives at a workshop for jive-dancing from about 1965. Why? The function of such a technique is to massage the viewer into the acceptance of assertions whilst de-potentiating rational engagement. It is like the "programming" scene from "The Parallax View". The effect is the unpleasant sense that the film-maker is attempting to make us accept that against which we might otherwise be guarded.
Replace that monologue with a sound-track of dance-music and the programme would look little different from that one-time staple of late night viewing "The Trip".