"CSI: Crime Scene Investigation" Leaving Las Vegas (TV Episode 2007) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Justice, Especially For Catherine
ccthemovieman-118 December 2008
Warning: Spoilers
This was a predictable story but nonetheless a fast-moving one that was still fun to watch. You knew "Catherine" was going to get her justice in the end, especially when they portrayed the defense attorney as a scumbag.

Catherine and Nick go to a small town to investigate a murder than might lead to implicating an obviously-guilty guy set free by that aforementioned attorney. The best part of that long segment is Catherine using her sexuality as a means of getting crucial information from an inmate.

Meanwhile, series star "Gil Grisson" (William Petersen) is going on a four-week sabbatical back East to teach some boring subject about pond mosquitoes. He assigns Catherine to take over for him while he's gone. There is a short funny scene with "Nick Stokes" (George Eads) who thinks his boss is leaving for good.

There also is an interesting ending involving another "miniature." Does that mean the man arrested recently is not the real killer? I guess that story will be continued when Gil gets back.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
The End is Dramatic, and killing...
moonman19015 January 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Grissom leaves the CSI office, and a little while later he receives another miniature. Before that Catherine testifies against a man who was arrested for killing his mother. Unable to fine enough evidence to prove him guilty, she goes back into a case from 3 years back, in which the mother and daughter die in the same way. After finding enough evidence she puts the real killer in jail, and a wrongfully convicted man is set free. This episode could reveal even more to the miniature killer... The Real one. Most likely an insider. Dr. Gilbert Grissom receives one more miniature, in which once again the CSI team will try to stop the real killer. Grissom takes a sabbatical and leaves the team.
8 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
One of the very few looks below the surface...
Anonymous_Maxine17 October 2008
Warning: Spoilers
(spoiler!) So we learned right at the end of season 6 that Sara and Gil were living together (or sleeping together), as she walked into the room in a bathrobe at the end of the season finale. I've always noticed from the beginning of the series that occasionally there are very brief hints into their personal lives, but nothing ever seems to be really revealed.

We've known for a few years that Sara is interested in Grissom romantically, Nick's personal life is almost entirely secret still (except for a fling or two early in the series), Warrick popped up married out of the blue one day and Catherine was clearly disappointed to have lost an opportunity, but it has always seemed like any revelations like this were thrown in using just a few seconds of screen time, and then back to the cases.

I like that the show doesn't turn into a soap opera because I would lose interest in a hurry, but this is one of the few episodes that tells us more about what's going on. Very little more, but still more.

I loved the cases that they dealt with. A new homicide leads the team to an old and supposedly closed case of a double murder. Catherine goes off on her own to meet the guy they put in prison for it, and finds a foul-mouthed dirtbag that claims he's innocent. In order to get him to cooperate and answer some more questions about the crime that he's already been imprisoned for, she promises to unbutton a button on her shirt for each question that he answers satisfactorily.

As it turns out, he was apparently coerced by the police into giving a confession for the double murder, badgering him during questioning and claiming that they already had enough evidence for a conviction, and if he didn't confess he'd get the death penalty.

Catherine was pretty angry with the local cop for coercing a confession, but wasn't that blouse-unbuttoning a bit of coersion too? At least it was more enjoyable than the first time, I suppose.

Anyway, the two cases taken together highlight the CSI team's skills compared to the bungling foolishness of other police forces. Once the local cops had coerced their confession, they actually stopped investigating, even though they knew there were more bullets buried at the residence where the murders took place. Nice work!

The local cops also left a massive plot hole in the story, something uncommon in a CSI episode. There was a little boy at the residence who was hiding, but apparently they never asked him any questions about what happened. When our team comes in, Nick and Catherine ask him his version, and he gives one that doesn't reveal anything that they didn't already know, but for some reason they seem to feel that they have gotten some valuable information.

The boy was hiding under the sink when the killer knocked on the door, forced his way inside and then stabbed and killed his mother and sister, then he walked outside into the backyard. Then, he says, the killer came back in the front door and called the police.

I don't know why anyone was interested in this news, because they already knew the sequence of events leading to the boy's mother and sister's deaths. There is, of course, no way of knowing if the man who came through the front door and called the police was the same man who had just walked out the back door. Why would he leave through the back and come in through the front?

Anyway, the hiding under the sink was funny to me, because when I was five or six, I used to hide under the sink drinking maple syrup while my mom was at work, then when she came home I'd run up to her and say, "I wasn't drinking the syrup!" I was a terrible liar.

Gil leaves on sabbatical at the end of the episode and is supposedly gone when he gets a large box from the miniature killer, which is good because the conclusion to that 3-episode case was a little disappointing.

In a huge change of character, he tells Sara on the way out the door that he'll miss her...
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Rebound
Hitchcoc13 February 2021
Catherine is a bulldog. Sometimes overly emotional, ignoring protocols, she is, nevertheless, focused. In this one she testifies in the trial of a man of limited acuity and he gets off on technicalities. She is convinced he is guilty and takes Nick with her to find if he has killed before because double jeopardy applies to this case. The episode is excellent as she goes to a town where a similar murder occurred (a stabbing followed by a shooting). She engages the officer who pursued the case and this leads to some exciting implications. We also have Gil heading off on a sabbatical.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
In Larkston
claudio_carvalho13 February 2023
While testifying in court in a murder case, Catherine sees the suspect Jay Finch be considered not guilty by the jury despite the evidences. The defense attorney Adam Novak succeeds to convince the jury that Jay in not the guilty. Catherine and Nick watch Jay's interview, but she knows that she cannot charge Jay again for the murder of his mother since it would be double-jeopardy. So, they look for unsolved crimes that Jay could be the suspect. They use the mileage in his odometer to seethe towns where Jay could have gone, and they find an unsolved murder in Larkston. She tells Grissom that she will leave Las Vegas, and he tells Catherine that he will leave on a four-week sabbatical and she will be the responsible for the department.

"Leaving Las Vegas" is another good episode of "CSI", with a story of justice. It is impressive the number of unsolved murders around the world and in the US is not an exception. This episode shows how a jury may be manipulated by a great lawyer and how murders may be unsolved due to the lack of specialized manpower. My vote is eight.

Title (Brazil): "Leaving Las Vegas"
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed