Nina brings her friendly and scholarly approach to explaining sex in this somewhat misguided intro to the not-so wonderful world of Squirting. I felt I was being educated and simultaneouly misled by the well-meaning Grand Dame of porn.
That's because, analogous to the "Fake News" craze of the past year or so, Nina doesn't address directly the Elephant in the Room. She gives interesting and undoubtedly scientific-based facts about female anatomy and how secretions create the "I'm wet!" phenomenon familiar in porn, while continuing the myth of vast fountains of Female Ejaculation, which is merely a Golden Shower or turkey-baster primed emitting of Poland Spring water from a gal's genitals.
So with all Hartley's professorial discussion of "retrograde ejaculation" in which supposedly for non-squirting women (the vast majority) the build-up of liquid backs up into the bladder instead of blasting outside through the urethra, the frequent and profitable fountains of squirt practiced by porn stars ranging from Jada Fire, Deauxma and Cytherea to current champs like Adriana Chechik and Veronica Avluv remains a mysterious and phony phenomenon.
Mika Tan is a good sport as Nina's co-host, showing off her pretty pussy as Nina takes to the enlarge diagrams to show us what a woman's insides look like in the groin area. Later we have Hartley donning her cougar hat in order to make explicit lesbian advances to Anna Mills (a familiar lady from the world of bondage and fetish videos) while working over Anna's pussy in extreme "raw meat" close-ups intended to gross out rather than arouse the viewer. Hartley's husband Ernest Greene directed and must take the blame for this slightly disturbing segment that climaxes in Anna using a stainless steel toy to prompt the fake waterworks.
Fictional portion of the program teams Trent Soluri and a famous squirter Angela Stone in a bit of acting, with Stone delivering more of a dribble rather than her usual fountains action. Real or fake? Nina isn't telling.
1 of 1 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?
| Report this