The Courier (2020) Poster

(2020)

User Reviews

Review this title
379 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
nice old fashion espionage thriller
SnoopyStyle19 August 2021
It's 1960 and the Cold War is heating up. High level Soviet official Oleg Penkovsky (Merab Ninidze) is concerned. He risks everything to contact the West. CIA agent (Rachel Brosnahan) suggests using an amateur as a conduit. They recruit everyday salesman Greville Wynne (Benedict Cumberbatch) who has done some business behind the Iron Curtain.

This is an old fashion espionage thriller. It's heightened by its true story nature and the two lead performers. Greville's regular everyday-man character is very compelling. The two men's friendship is very interesting. It may not be something new but it is very well-done. The last part is a little flat but that has to do with its true story nature. This is a throwback in the best sense.
66 out of 71 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Excellent film based on a true story
Red-12520 October 2021
The Courier (2020) is an English movie directed by Dominic Cooke. The film takes place during the height of the Cold War.

It stars Benedict Cumberbatch as Greville Wynne, a middle-class mid-level British business man. Oleg Penkovsky, portrayed by Mereb Ninindze, is a high-ranking Soviet official who knows that there's a real chance of nuclear war.

British intelligence recruits Wynne to make a connection with Penkovsky. His job will be to bring back important information that will help the western powers. Rachel Brosnahan portrays a U. S. CIA agent who is working with British intelligence.

The film succeeds or fails on the work of Cumberbatch. He's a superb actor, and the movie falls into place on the basis of his acting. (In fairness, he's such a competent actor that I had a little trouble accepting him as a less-than-competent businessman.) Ninindze does good work, but I had trouble accepting Brosnahan as a CIA agent. (Mrs. Maisel, yes. CIA, no.) For the record, I also had trouble with the basic assumption that the CIA agents were the good guys.

This movie provides an intense, claustrophobic experience. It's very well done, but at the other end of the spectrum from James Bond spy movies. We saw this film on the small screen, where it worked well. It has a barely adequate IMDb rating of 7.1. I thought that it was better than that, and rated it 8.
28 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Need more like this
dwill-8344028 March 2021
We need more movies like this. If you enjoy movies that teach history with good acting and are clean without all the typical Hollywood garbage then this movie is for you. Terrific movie!
255 out of 304 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Early 1960s, USA and Russia drama in the cold war.
TxMike28 August 2021
It was the early 1960s, the USA and Russia were in a race to amass nuclear weapons. It was to the point that if both of them did a maximum launch at each other it would destroy most of the world as we knew it. In truth they wanted to bury each other.

In October 1962 I was a senior in high school and that is the month of an event that came to be called the Cuban missile crisis. Russia decided to move nuclear missiles to Cuba, just a few miles off the coast of the USA. There was nothing favorable about that move. The still new US President JFK had a tough decision, how to confront Russia and get them to reverse their plans. As history witnessed Russia backed off.

That is a central theme in the story here, based on real people and real events. An English businessman was convinced to expand his business dealings to Russia, there he would befriend a Russian who would pass him photographic microfilm. He became the courier. A main topic were the plans to place the missiles in Cuba. This spy work was what tipped England and the USA off to the Russian plans and allowed them to monitor the situation which eventually resulted in the confrontation to get Russian ships to turn back.

This is a very good movie, well-acted and well-told. My wife and watched it streaming on Amazon.

Edit July 2023: Watching it again, it is such a well-made and well-acted movie you can watch it every year or two and still enjoy it as much as the first time.
31 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Good watch but..
chait-kulkarni22 April 2021
Why did they not show Oleg Penkovsky's actual image too at the end. It could have been a better film had they given both the characters equal importance too..

Penkovsky's story seemed more interesting..
70 out of 98 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The Courier
studioAT26 August 2021
A surprisingly good watch, with it being nice to see Mr Cumberbatch in a role that isn't a Marvel green screen epic.

I recommend this film.
16 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
...true story, but...
maca01119018 April 2021
...somewhere after 1 hour and 29 minutes, someone, who knows only "bad Russians" and "west is the best", hear Russian investigator mumbling something about American missiles in Turkey... ...ups, those missiles were there long before nuclear heads on Cuba... ...so, to correct true story, first was Turkey, then was Cuba... ...I would rather say "Turkey missile crisis" than "Cuban missile crisis"... ...anyway, both presidents agreed on not mentioning American obligation to remove those missiles from Turkey in favor of Russia doing the same...
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
They do make like they used to.
mick-meyers16 August 2021
Excellent film,first class acting.the while film is remedy to the big blockbusters.the transformation of Benedict Cumberbatch,from clueless pawn in a political high stakes game to a more caring person as well as the physical change is staggering.abetted by a solid supporting cast.a must see film this year.
77 out of 82 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
tie clip
ferguson-619 March 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Greetings again from the darkness. Spies, and the whole world of espionage, are prime for cinema thanks to the globe-trotting and varied settings, the personality of those drawn to such a calling, and the intrigue and two sides of the work itself - either turning on those to whom one was once loyal, or even pretending to. Director Dominic Cooke (ON CHESIL BEACH, 2017) and writer Tom O'Connor (THE HITMAN'S BODYGUARD, 2017) enter the spy thriller genre with a strong cast and a Cold War setting ... not the first to do so, and certainly not the last.

The film is based on a true story, so of course there are conflicting recollections of how this all went down. Oleg Penkovsky (played expertly by Merab Ninidze, McMAFIA, 2018) was part of GRU, the main intelligence agency of the Soviet Union. His front row seat to, and subsequent concern with, Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev's apparent obsession with starting a nuclear war with the United States, led Penkovsky to reach out to the U. S with classified intelligence in hopes of thwarting global doom. This was the height of the Cold War, with the Cuban Missile Crisis ultimately a key element of Penkovsky's intel.

Ambitious CIA Agent Emily Donovan (Rachel Brosnahan, "The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel") reached out to MI6 Agent Dickie Franks, who recruited British salesman Greville Wynne (Benedict Cumberbatch) to be their amateur spy ... a regular citizen to conduct regular business while procuring valuable documents from Penkovsky. Greville is portrayed as anything but a James Bond-type. Instead, he's a fun-loving family man whose wife Sheila (Jesse Buckley, I'M THINKING OF ENDING THINGS, 2020) has forgiven him once for marital indiscretion, and is not inclined to do so again.

This story occurred not long after Pyotr Semyonovich Popov was executed for delivering Soviet intelligence to the United States. Because of this, the CIA had a weak presence and required Britain's assistance ... enter Greville Wynne. Greville is an odd bird. One could even say a bit goofy. However, Cumberbatch delivers a terrific performance as he transitions into a more complex and courageous man than the one we initially meet.

Although the story is not as tightly told as the best spy thrillers, there are two segments that are pretty well done. Watching Penkovsky (code name "Ironbark") and Greville get to know each other and then work together is quite interesting - and made even better by the two actors. Also the final act, with both men in KGB prison, finally ups the tension level to what we expect for the genre. The brutal environment and mistreatment is well conveyed, and it's the point where we realize what the risk-taking of espionage can lead to. There are times the film is similar in tone to THE INFORMANT, and other times it recalls BRIDGE OF SPIES, though the latter is a superior film. This was a crucial point in the Cold War, and the film is interesting enough thanks to the cast and real life story.

THE COURIER is receiving a theatrical release on March 19, 2021.
34 out of 51 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Collector
kosmasp6 July 2021
Real life stories can be tricky. In the horror genre they can fail miserably ... in the War scenarios or spy and real people stories, it does look differently though. Like with this one. And while I reckon one could argue that side characters feel shallow or one dimensional (the wives for example), I'd argue there is not enough time to get and have everyone have their moment.

Still the British wife we have here, does have some zingers and you can really feel her pain and understand her anxiety over all that is happening. Even if she has the wrong idea of what is going on. Having said all that, the actors are fantastic and the tension is really holding up throughout ... you may know where this is going (and what happened with Cuba and the missilie crisis), but it won't take anything away from what we see on screen.
74 out of 80 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
a movie worth seeing that may fall under the radar
Quinoa19842 April 2021
A superbly acted and fairly involving "Based on a True Story" spy movie jam that is good, but one can't help and consider could have been a "Great" column entry with a Spielberg (yes yes even with Bridge of Spies) or even Tarantino at the helm. This isn't to say director Cooke does a poor job or even incompetent, on the contrary he has excellent staging and a more than fine cinematographer with Sean Bobbitt framing some intensely emotional beats and moments throughout (one where we see a freak out in a prison all through the tiny peephole in the door is one notable one for me), but there doesn't seem to be much time for a major set pieces or two or three for a sequence to stand out.

This is an inherently suspenseful story, yet until about two thirds in it rarely has time to slow down for a scene to last longer than thirty seconds to a couple of minutes (a scene where the Brit and Russian watch Swan Lake in heightened emotional responses is an exception), so while it is all good and grown-up entertainment it could do with letting us feel in a more concentrated way what Wynn has to go through when he is doing his Not-but-Kinda springs, albeit this is more of a MP (my problem) than YP (yours) as far as taste with these sorts of thrillers. All this said, Cumberbatch has one of his finest roles since the Imitation Game, and I was quite keen on every moment with Brosnahan, Ninidze (who if he wasn't on The Americans he should have been) and Buckley (who reminds me in a great way of Rita Tushingham from that same time period this is set).

It can't help but go ultimately to some of the conventions of a story like this, like how characters talk about what to do about A B or C, and a reminder near the very end of the Good Times I guess(?) But if you're wanting something with the air of the now late John Le Carre and it's playing in theaters and you are in a healthy way to see it, it does well for a weekend matinee.
18 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Cumberbatch Continues To Move The Acting Bar Higher 💯
Instant_Palmer28 April 2021
One of Benedict Cumberbatch's best performances to date, which makes it one of the greatest acting performances period. His startling physical transformations, spot-on dialogue delivery, and appropriately subtle and highly-effective character manifestations (he's a spy not a Hollywood super-hero for those hung up on the film not emulating Bond or Bourne "big moment" scenes), are all testimony to his commitment to the acting craft. He once again proves why he is (simply-put) one of this era's greatest actors.

This role should garner award nominations across the spectrum of such ceremonies for Benedict.

The Courier is well above average as espionage films go - subtle pacing actually magnifies tension in the story - the most elemental fuel for any thriller.

No spy film is better at emotionally connecting the viewer with the lead character - painting an accurate portrayal of both a spy's methodology, and the inevitable inner conflicts and angst involved in the job, and in one's personal life. This unique trait elevates the film.

The Director maintains a refreshingly low-key atmosphere in scenes, befitting the "trade-craft" of espionage that thrives on innocuous and concealing behavior (rather than the overly dramatic big moments too often leaned upon in blockbuster spy films). None of that nonsense would actually occur as spies would bring too much attention to themselves - a sure way of having a short career and brief lifespan.

This is a spotlight film role carried by Benedict, but a film of this immense achievement does not occur without similarly great performances by the supporting cast.

Merab Ninidze hits one over the Berlin Wall and deserves recognition for his remarkable supporting role performance.

Rachel Brosnahan was spot-on as well, and is clearly on a roll after her deserved critical praise for 'The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel'.

Tom O'Conner's screenplay is brilliant as is Dominic Cooke's directing, and Gareth Scales' editing which somehow brings this fascinating true story to film in under two hours.

The Courier has me once again ('Spotlight' being the first in 2015) breaking my long standing rule of not putting a film on the Top 100 All Time Greatest list within a year of its release. I often view better films multiple times over the long haul. Some hold up; some gain respect; and some regress. I'm anticipating The Courier will not lose ground over time, and may gain, but we shall see.

👍👍
204 out of 229 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A relevant and respectable espionage thriller.
Pjtaylor-96-13804424 February 2022
'The Courier (2020)' is a cold-war espionage thriller based on true events that tells the story of an ordinary businessman who, with the help of a Russian informant, ends up smuggling state secrets out of the USSR and into the hands of MI6 and the CIA in an effort to prevent nuclear war. For reasons that ought to be obvious, the film feels incredibly relevant at the time of writing; one can only hope that history is not repeating itself. Though the real-life story on which this is based is an interesting and important one, the piece itself is sadly rather basic and, even, a little bit flat. The first act is actually really slow, while the third shifts its focus away from low-key spying and into much more overtly horrific territory. This latter segment is probably the most straightforwardly compelling part of the picture, as it portrays a painful situation and moves at a much faster pace. That isn't to imply that there isn't merit in the preceding acts, though. The flick is, at times, an engaging experience that plays with genre tropes in an expected yet grounded way. The performances are all solid and, for the most part, the tone is consistently portentous. However, the thing is just a tad dull overall. It's hard to even describe why, actually. There's just this slightly intangible 'good enough' quality to it, a quality that many pictures of a similar ilk share. It's a respectable effort, but it doesn't go above and beyond what it initially sets itself up to be. It's a decent historical thriller, but it isn't a great one. 6/10.
11 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A cursory spy movie lacking in detail and interest
rac98766 April 2022
Businessman Greville Wynne gets recruited by the intelligence services to communicate with OIeg Penkovsky, a high-level source in the USSR. He does it for a while, and he and the source become friends, then it all goes predictably wrong. There's about as much interest in that summary as there is in this movie. It's like they took a template for a spy movie and forgot to fill in any of the detail. It's all passably done - good period sets and props, no terrible acting - but there's nothing for us or the actors to get our teeth into.

The plot is moved along at crucial moments by hasty montages which add to the generic, hand-waving feel of the whole thing. Some men did spy stuff and hoped not to get caught, with predictable results. It makes MI6 and the CIA look naive for expecting the KGB to be stupid, and it fails to convey the weight and difficulty of what Penkovsky did given his position. The characters aren't well enough built for you to start feeling for them. In all, it feels like the movie equivalent of an introductory paragraph on Wikipedia.

The film is based on a true story which must have been full of suffering and drama, but it managed to make the story seem less interesting and consequential than it actually was. A hurried film and a wasted opportunity.
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
It is one of the films that describes the tensions between the USA and the USSR very well.
fzulkadiroglu28 May 2022
Warning: Spoilers
In the movie, which has a very calm and solid start, we witness how spy Wynne suddenly finds herself in such a dangerous job, while she had nothing to do with the events, until she met the Russian mole Penkovsky (Merab Nidze). Therefore, as an innocent bystander, we can empathize with Wynne right away. Because Wynne is actually a businessman. Therefore, we give the impression that he went to Moscow for business and we experience the stress, uncertainty and fear he experienced in the "courier" job, which is actually mentioned in the title of the film, together with him.

In the later scenes of the movie, the Russian mole Penkovsky makes a sentence to the spy Wynn; "Sometimes a lie is gift, an act of love." Here, Penkovsky tells Wynn, "If you love your wife, you should be able to lie to her. Think of it as an act of love, given to you by God." The mole trains the spy and shows him the way to walk.

While everything is going well in the first hour of the movie, the Russian military intelligence g.r.u. And kgb begins to suspect Wynne and Penkovsky's actions. When Penkovsky is prevented from going to the trade fair in England, Penkovsky sends a "telegram" to Wynne, who has returned to England at the time. Wynne returns to Moscow to rescue her Russian friend, who provided her with intelligence and helped her earn a lot of money for her family. Agent Emily says she will accompany him, but even though Agent Dickie says it's too dangerous, they both go to Moscow to rescue Penkovsky. But Agent Dickie is right and Emily is persona non gratailan and deported by the USSR. G.r.u. Penkovsky in his office, which he stopped by before fleeing the country. (USSR military isth.) captured by. Wynne, on the other hand, is nabbed by a KGB agent on her return flight to England before the plane takes off.

The next part of the movie is a bit boring. The treatment and humiliation done to Wynne in prison is made more severe against Penkovsky for treason. Fortunately, after six months in solitary confinement, Wynne and Penkovsky are brought together in the interrogation room as part of the investigation. Here Wynne tells Penkovsky the positive news his wife had given him in closed conversation. "Because of you, the USSR withdrew the missile system it deployed in Cuba and the crisis is over," he says. Penkovsky learns that his act with Wynne may have saved millions of lives. At the end of the movie, we unfortunately learn that he was executed and buried in an unmarked grave.

Wynne, on the other hand, is used in the spy swap between the countries of Soviet agent Konon Molody, after nearly 1.5 years of imprisonment, and is released and reunites with her beloved family.

When the movie is over, we learn that Penkovsky has leaked more than 5,000 top secret military documents of the USSR out of the country, and in this respect, it is the most valuable Soviet resource the West has ever produced. In this respect, we also understand how vital the work of Penkovsky and Wynne is. We also read that after the Cuban crisis, a direct telephone connection was established between the white house and the Kremlin, and an important step was taken to prevent such dangerous events.

As an important detail from the movie; Penkovksy and Wynne's reactions while watching Tchaikovsky's swan lake ballet in Bolshoi were also quite meaningful. Wynne applauds the ballet with tearful eyes as the show ends, knowing that her friend Penkovsky's life is in danger. Whereas he looks quite brave and fearless, clapping his hands violently and standing up to applaud enthusiastically. Here, the emotional reactions of the characters were high.

Finally, we learn that Penkovsky also served in Ankara in the 50s. Also g.r.u. The Turkish cigarette that his director offered to Penkovksy and his saying that he would send a cardboard to him, referring to his years in Ankara, made me very nervous like Penkovsky.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Gripping
Gordon-111 May 2021
This is a pretty gripping film about the cold war. Benedict's transformation is remarkable as well. I enjoyed watching it.
13 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A Decent Spy Tale
skjeffrey30 January 2022
Good acting, great scenery, wardrobes, 60's era atmosphere, and believeable (true) story. Terrible lighting was a serious flaw. Didn't quite buy Rachel Brosnahan as a fairly high level espionage handler.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Better Than Dr. Strange - The Courier
arthur_tafero19 April 2022
Benedict Cumberbatch is a talented actor, best known for his work in the Dr. Strange films, which are quite entertaining in their own right. However, this film mirrors a piece of American History I am quite familiar with as I lived through it The Cuban Missile Crisis. The film in nicely directed and the supporting cast does an excellent job with their roles, especially Merab Ninidze as the Russian colonel. The film is gripping from beginning to end, and is one of the better spy films made in this century. Catch it.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A perfect period piece
SomeUselessGeek6 January 2022
Really, I don't know how this film could have been made any better. All the performances were top notch and believable. Cumberbatch has set a modern-day standard for dedication to his craft in the likeness of De Niro's _Raging Bull_ weight gain and loss. Cumberbatch put himself fully into the character of a starving Soviet espionage prisoner at a time when Ivan wasn't being too conciliatory to Westerners.

Wow, this whole film had me on the edge of my seat despite its being a recitation of historical fact. Knowing how the story comes out in no way diminishes the telling of that story by those who have mastered the storytelling craft.
17 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Honorable Story about the Inglorious Works of Spies
Mabkid9 February 2023
The most important American asset in Russia during the Cold War. The movie does not nearly do enough justice to Oleg Penkovsky's contributions to the US and the UK. A quick read up on the net helps do justice to both Oleg Penkovsky and Greville Wynne.

Still, The Courier is a solid production. Most notable is Benedict Cumberbatch's dedicated performance, including the drastic changes to his body weight. Merab Ninidze also does a splendid job.

Of course, real life spy work is less like Hollywood action movies... so there's just a lot of taking photos on small cameras and passing packages around. You won't get a lot of close call James Bond type action scenes. So the actual exciting bit was describing the precautions to spy work. Articulating what goes behind the scenes of seemingly unnoticeable spy work was appreciated. But that was pretty short.

The Courier also tries to be a little too ambitious. I don't know if the final act was necessary. Obviously, it showcased Cumberbatch's acting skills the most. However, it did seem like an entirely different movie.

Finally, the homage to good patriotic work is appreciated. Hard to diss two heroes, and glad I could know more about the folks who risk their lives in the shadows to protect us.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Benedict hits this out of the park
blanche-221 April 2021
Benedict Cumberbatch stars with Rachel Brosnahan, Zelijko Ivanek, and Merab Nindze) in "The Courier" from 2021.

The film takes place around the time of the Cuban Missile Crisis. Anyone who lived through it knows it was a terrifying time. MI6 receives correspondence from a Russian colonel, Oleg Penovsky, who has information that makes him concerned that Khruschev is about to start a nuclear war.

Two people from MI6 (Brosnahan and Ivanek) recruit a businessman, Greville Wynne (Cumberbatch) to go to Russia as part of his business and begin to build accounts there. That's all he has to do, and he's given a special tie clip to wear. This is so he can be recognized by the colonel (Nindze).

The two become friends, and set up a clever way so that Penovsky can slip him photos that Wynne brings back to the states. Wynne's frequent trips cause him problems at home with his wife and son. Meanwhile, the Russians have missiles in Cuba aimed at strategic spots in the U. S.

This is based on a true story, and this film has everything - great acting, suspense, drama, and one of the most incredible scenes ever filmed toward the end. Cumberbatch is brilliant. He has the most dramatic role and boy, does he live up to it. Merab Ninidze as his Russian contact is wonderful, and the two men have good chemistry together.

This film will stay with you after it's over.
83 out of 93 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A peerless Cumberbatch and a miscast Buckley.
bob-the-movie-man16 August 2021
It's not to be confused with the Olga Kurylenko / Gary Oldman 2019 movie of the same title. But with a fresh Berlin current-day Russian spy scandal in the news this week, seeing the cold war spy drama "The Courier" is a timely thing to do.

Positives:
  • Benedict Cumberbatch is outstandingly good in this. He could have been born to play the slightly bemused English gentlemen of the time. All golf, tweed suits and gentlemen's clubs. No spoilers, but there is a physical transformation as well that's impressive to observe. The film would have been decidedly so-so I think without that core central performance.


  • The film is based on a true story. As someone who was born in 1961, it's a good reminder to count our blessings that you, me and everyone else are still around to live our lives at all. The world was on the brink of a precipice and learning the story of Wynne's part in this was insightful history.


  • There's a nice catchy Russian-themed score by Abel Korzeniowski.


Negatives:
  • I'm a big fan of Jessie Buckley. Really, I am. And to be fair to her, her performance is really good. I particularly liked a scene where she dismissed on the doorstep a local busybody. But I just didn't see her as Wynne's pearl-neckless-wearing wife in this part. Perhaps the problem is that although there's a 13 year age gap between the leads, I always imagine Buckley as being much younger that her 31 years. For whatever reason, the casting didn't work for me.


Summary Thoughts on "The Courier": As a true-life spy story, the movie is interesting and Cumberbatch's performance is brilliant. But I can't say that I was 100% grabbed by it. While having a few moments of high drama and tension - particularly one on a plane - I never felt that to be maintained for enough of the movie. Director Dominic Cooke has a limited filmography (with the Saoirse Ronan movie "On Chesil Beach" being his only other feature) and writer Tom O'Connor is the guy behind the more flippant "Hitman's Bodyguard" films. Perhaps a more experienced writer/director team would have elevated this to a higher level.

So it's eminently watchable but not memorable. And so a marginal hit in my book.

(For the full graphical review, please check out onemannsmovies on the web, Facebook and Tiktok. Thanks.)
13 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Behind the Cuban Missile Crisis
zardoz-1314 June 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Sometimes, the most extraordinary people are the most ordinary. For example, take real-life English businessman Greville Wynne. British Intelligence approached this civilian with an audacious proposition to act as a courier between MI6 and one of their greatest undercover assets, a high-ranking GRU Colonel in Soviet Intelligence who had access to confidential material. "Hallowed Crown" BBC mini-series director Dominic Cooke and "The Hitman's Bodyguard" scenarist Tom O'Connor have chronicled Wynne's brief career in "The Courier" as a go-between behind the Iron Curtain. Mind you, Greville looked nothing like James Bond. Heavily mustached and hopelessly out of shape, Wynne imbibed more alcohol than necessary. Furthermore, he looked so nondescript you could pass him on the street and never give him a second glance. When MI6 recruits him, they are searching for an inconspicuous salesman who won't attract attention. Initially, such an offer captivates Greville, but he thinks twice before he accepts it. One of the reasons that changed his mind is the prospect that the Soviets might rain down their nuclear arsenal on England, and everybody from Greville's wife to his son Andrew would die without enough body parts to justify a coffin. The threat of a nuclear holocaust dangled like the Sword of Damocles over not only his homeland but also his family. As it turns out, Greville played a key role in the infamous Cuban Missile Crisis that pitted the two superpowers-the United States and the Soviet Union-in what could have been a nuclear Armageddon. If you saw Roger Donaldson's "Thirteen Days" (2000) with Kevin Costner, this superb saga chronicled the political showdown between U. S. President John F. Kennedy and feisty Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev in October of 1962.

Although it eschews martinis shaken but not stirred and gravity-defying martial-arts acrobatics, "The Courier" is still a nerve-racking ordeal from start to finish, and the filmmakers don't tamper with the historical details as they might have. This PG-13 thriller never runs out of suspense during its gripping 112-minute runtime. The performances and attention to atmosphere make it a splendid addition to other realistic British espionage epics in the mold of John Le Carre's bestsellers that became notable movies like "The Spy Who Came in from the Cold" (1965) and "Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy" (2011). Benedict Cumberbatch, star of the BBC-TV's "Sherlock" and "Dr. Strange" in the Marvel/Disney franchise, toplines as the gregarious Greville, and the role allows Cumberbatch to alter his appearance, so he looks like nobody special. Of course, Wynne has considerable trepidation about his new venture. He fears he may be caught, imprisoned, and perhaps even face a firing squad. Repeatedly, spymaster Dickie Franks (Angus Wright of "Cutthroat Island") and CIA liaison Emily Donovan (Rachel Brosnahan of "Beautiful Creatures") assure him he'll never arouse Soviet suspicions.

Eventually, when he meets his Soviet contact, Oleg Penkovsky (Merab Ninidze of "Hostages"), the Russian allays Greville's anxieties about capture. Oleg points out to Greville that he isn't technically a spy since he won't know the secrets he is smuggling from East to West. Nevertheless, Greville doesn't share Oleg's confidence. He is dismayed when he cannot discuss his extracurricular activities with his wife, Sheila (Jessie Buckley of "Beast"), and this exacerbates their domestic discord. Apparently, Greville committed a marital indiscretion in the past and neither Sheila nor he have resolved the problem. Suffice to say, Sheila suspects Greville is cheating on her again, but this time in faraway Moscow.

Oleg coaches Greville about the propriety of their relationship in public. He warns the British salesman that Soviet Intelligence will keep him under constant surveillance. Furthermore, the KGB will search his hotel rooms, while bellhops and custodians will keep track of his activities. Greville is told everybody in the Soviet Union serves as the KGB's eyes and ears. He must never say anything in public because the KGB has lip-readers, and he should always take his cues from Oleg. They attend Soviet cultural events, like the ballet, and Oleg introduces him to his wife and daughter. However, Greville cannot join them at supper because the Soviets prohibit foreigners from dining in the homes of their subjects. However, Greville accommodates Oleg when he appears as a part of the Soviet trade delegation in London. He invites Oleg to dine with his family. Eventually, an inquisitive KGB Inspector, Gribanov (Kirill Pirogov of "Dark Planet"), visits Oleg at his office and questions him at length about Greville. Oleg assures Gribanov that Greville is obsessed primarily with economics rather than political ideology. Gribanov admits that he has perused all of Oleg's reports about the Briton.

The turning point comes when MI6 wants to pull Greville from the field. By this time, Greville has grown accustomed to the KGB's scrutiny. Someday, he knows Oleg plans to defect with his family and relocate to Montana. Suddenly, MI6 and the CIA show a complete lack of remorse about Oleg's fate. Of course, Greville could have walked away from the intrigue and its dangers, but his camaraderie with Oleg prompts him to return to Moscow. Greville tells them Oleg would never abandon him in the field, and he refuses to abandon Oleg. This represents a palatable change in Greville's attitude, compared to when he feared getting arrested. "The Courier" is a personal story based on actual events. Nothing genuinely alarming occurs in the plot until the final half hour. "The Courier" is largely a character driven drama. No innocent bystanders clutter up the predicaments, but the KGB looms as an inexorable adversary. Ultimately, "The Courier" achieves significance because it covers the earliest stages of the impending Cuban Missile Crisis. Signs that Khrushchev sought to place missiles in Cuba to counter U. S. missiles in Turkey came from Oleg's messages Greville sneaked back to MI6. Their combined undercover work gave the CIA enough of a heads up to prepare for this contingency. They changed history, and therein lays their importance. Indeed, you'll get carried away by "The Courier" and its inspirational history.
45 out of 49 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A reasonably well made, paint-by-numbers, cold-war espionage flick...
tccandler17 April 2021
A reasonably well made, paint-by-numbers, cold-war espionage flick with a solid cast. There are no real complaints about this true story, but it all feels a tad stale and has the look of something we have all seen before. It is professionally presented, but slightly forgettable.
63 out of 127 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Meh
imdb-9532319 February 2022
Well-made, but just not that interesting. Found myself doing other stuff about half way through. Shame really because they clearly put a lot of work into it.
12 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed