5.6/10
3,146
27 user 35 critic

Brief Interviews with Hideous Men (2009)

Not Rated | | Comedy , Drama | 19 January 2009 (USA)
Trailer
1:47 | Trailer

Watch Now

From $3.99 (SD) on Prime Video

A graduate student (Nicholson) copes with a recent breakup by conducting interviews with various men.

Director:

John Krasinski

Writers:

John Krasinski (screenplay), David Foster Wallace (story collection)
1 nomination. See more awards »

Videos

Photos

Edit

Cast

Cast overview, first billed only:
Julianne Nicholson ... Sara Quinn
Ben Shenkman ... Subject #14
Timothy Hutton ... Professor Adams / Subject #30
Michael Cerveris ... Subject #15
Corey Stoll ... Subject #51
Chris Messina ... Subject #19
Max Minghella ... Kevin / Subject #28
Lou Taylor Pucci ... Evan / Subject #28
Will Arnett ... Subject #11
John Krasinski ... Ryan / Subject #20
Will Forte ... Subject #72
Joey Slotnick ... Tad / Subject #59
Clarke Peters ... Subject #31
Dominic Cooper ... Daniel / Subject #46
Benjamin Gibbard ... Harry / Subject #20 (as Ben Gibbard)
Edit

Storyline

A graduate student (Nicholson) copes with a recent breakup by conducting interviews with various men.

Plot Summary | Plot Synopsis

Taglines:

Don't say you weren't warned... listen in.

Genres:

Comedy | Drama

Certificate:

Not Rated | See all certifications »

Parents Guide:

View content advisory »
Edit

Details

Official Sites:

Official site

Country:

USA

Language:

English

Release Date:

19 January 2009 (USA) See more »

Also Known As:

Breves Diálogos com Homens Horríveis See more »

Edit

Box Office

Opening Weekend USA:

$18,510, 27 September 2009, Limited Release

Gross USA:

$27,935, 4 October 2009
See more on IMDbPro »

Company Credits

Show more on IMDbPro »

Technical Specs

Sound Mix:

Dolby Digital

Color:

Color

Aspect Ratio:

2.35 : 1
See full technical specs »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

During a scene in Professor Adams' office you can see a copy of the David Foster Wallace's most famous work, 'Infinite Jest', sitting on the top of a pile of books in the background See more »

Quotes

Ryan: I'm aware of how all this sounds and can well imagine the judgments you're forming, but if I'm really to explain this to you then I have no choice but to be... candid.
[sighs]
Ryan: Yes, it was a pickup. Plain and simple. And she was what one might call a granola cruncher. A hippy. And she was straight out of Central casting: the sandals, flamboyantly long hair, financial support from parents she reviled, and some professed membership in an apostrophe-heavy Eastern religion that I defy anyone to ...
[...]
See more »

Connections

Featured in Siskel & Ebert: Episode #24.4 (2009) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
interesting but not engaging
24 December 2012 | by grnhair2001See all my reviews

This movie may make you want to discuss it afterward with whoever you viewed it with but it never did move me emotionally. A woman interviews a series of men for her academic research and, in between interviews, interacts awkwardly with men in her life. I enjoyed the mystery of it, as I'd not read the book, and that mystery was (for me) what the heck is this woman researcher's field and what's her thesis topic? A number of the men she interviews are a bit hideous but many are not. The most common neurotic symptom the men display is projection, and I grew a bit tired of it, feeling that yes, I'd gotten that, and you can pull out a new device now. At different times in the movie I thought perhaps she was interviewing convicted rapists at a prison (and seeing their attitudes spookily reflected in the men in her quotidian life), or men who had answered an ad regarding sexual dysfunction, or men culled from a dating service or ... well, I wasn't sure, and it was a vaguely pleasant experience puzzling about it. The answer to that mystery is disappointing and bland, by the way, so my musings probably could serve as something of a Rorschach test for me...but as a technique driving the movie (in lieu of narrative drive) it didn't work very well because the payoff was absent.

I appreciate a movie that is thoughtful and isn't yet another stupid Hollywood film about crap blowing up and running gun battles, and I'll give it some stars for trying...but in the end, I found it sterile and without significant effect. In a week, I strongly suspect I'll have forgotten it. But thank you, filmmakers, for making something aimed at thinking adults rather than the adolescent/sociopath who loves watching crap blow up for the zillionth time.


4 of 5 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you? | Report this
Review this title | See all 27 user reviews »

Contribute to This Page



Recently Viewed