The Robinsons: Lost in Space (TV Movie 2004) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
12 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Meh
wwgrayii12 January 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Third time around for the Robinsons. This time, John Robinson is a retired space marine colonel/war hero who insists on taking his family wife Maureen,teens David and Judy, ten year-old Will, Will's robot and baby Penny) to another planet to become peaceful farmers and live off the land. After some by-the-book family melodrama (none of them, it seems, want to go on this trip), the Robinsons are on their way. Their mother ship (the "Jupiter") is soon under (unexplained) attack by clichéd aliens. David appears to be killed and the rest of them (along with hot young pilot Don West) are forced flee through a black hole in their landing craft (the "Jupiter 2"), ending up, well, you know...

Overall, typical action pilot. There's a lot of exposition to pack into 40-some minutes, and too much of that time is wasted on setting up the Robinson's dysfunctional dynamics, so it's hard to tell where this is all supposed to lead. It's a fair bet, however, that since it was made for the WB, had this been picked up, we would have seen a lot of Judy and Don.

John Woo's American career had pretty much derailed by 2003 and he was reduced to making this pilot for the WB. Actually he does an OK job, even managing to work in his trademark doves and slow motion.

As for the cast, about the only ones who impress are Ryan Malagrini as Will Robinson and Adrianne Palicki as Judy.

As is usual for unsold pilots these days, there are no credits (other than a crudely animated main title) and several visual effects (e.g. wire removal)were never finished.

As a side note, the sets were bought by the producers of "Battlestar Galactica" and after some modifications, were used as the interiors of the Battlestar Pegasus.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
This could have been interesting
Mandemus27 October 2006
Warning: Spoilers
I guess most people who have seen this unaired TV pilot at this point either worked on the show or saw one of the bootleg versions that pop up on the internet occasionally. I am in the latter group.

The Robinsons: Lost in Space was interesting to me mostly for the curiosity factor. The special effects were as good or better than most TV SF in the 1990s or early 2000s. The actors were good. Even the young actors were very professional. There was no low-budget feel to this effort at all, and it would have been great to see where this series might have gone.

My main disappointment was the paucity of science fiction present in this science fiction show. The original series (1965-1968), although sometimes silly and childish (it was aimed at children, after all), did indeed focus on some element of science fiction each week. In The Robinsons, the science was mostly in passing. For example, Will's robot experiment was a quick scene. The worm hole was used as a quick device to get them lost, but that's about all.

Still, for the Lost in Space completist, or SF fan seeking something that was well made and hard to find, this is well worth a look.
7 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
No need to get picked up
Horst_In_Translation4 November 2015
Warning: Spoilers
"The Robinsons: Lost in Space" is a 42-minute pilot television episode for a series that never got picked up. It is basically loosely based on a much older show that got some Emmy Awards consideration several decades earlier, but this remake did not cause enough attraction so it would get turned into a "real" show. The director here is John Woo who made several pretty famous films already and the writer team is also pretty well-known, one of them even an Oscar winner. Guess in exchange for that they had to save a bit of money on the cast. i don't know anybody there except Adrianne Palicki and she isn't exactly a big star either. The story is basically set in the future, about a family who is stuck between fighting evil alien creatures while also trying to get along with each other. This could have been great material for a comedy, but it is all drama and I miss some lighter moments in here. Maybe that is also one of the reason why I give this one a thumbs-down. I would not have watched a television show based on that short film here.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Will I live long enough to see somebody do this show right?
Thomas_Veil28 April 2013
The wait continues for those who love those early episodes of "Lost in Space" from 1965 and want more.

First we watched the original series slowly degenerate into camp. Then we got the 1998 theatrical film which started promisingly and then, like the series, got silly. And now this pilot, in which the first half consists of whining characters we never really learn to care about, and the second half is a formulaic alien invasion story.

Where is the sense of wonder here that permeated the original series? Douglas Petrie's script, in attempt to add character depth to what many people consider a ridiculous show, just falls flat. I don't know about you, but I wouldn't send a family who can't get their you-know-what together on a major space mission. And John Woo's direction, especially in the action-packed second half of the show, proceeds at breakneck speed with no sense of pacing. Like too many films these days, it's fastfastfast and never pauses to take a breath.

The antagonists in this pilot were a particularly poor choice. Unlike Dr. Smith, who was interesting because you always wanted to know what was going on in that scheming mind of his, these villains have absolutely no sense of subtlety. When the show demands a crafty J. R. Ewing-type, we get instead marauding critters out of a 1950s horror film.

And did you notice -- so much of the focus in this pilot is on the kids! Gee, what went wrong with the original series? Oh yeah, that's right!

Kevin Burns, whose "Time Tunnel" pilot was much better but still resembled the original in little besides nomenclature, really needs to turn over the duties of reviving Irwin Allen TV series to someone who understands them better. "Lost in Space" could be a great show again, and it deserves better than this.
10 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
I am so happy this wasn't picked up.
jegd-847-63140712 December 2013
Warning: Spoilers
I ran across this pilot maybe 10 years too late, but I'm here to say how happy I am that Warner Brothers did not pick this garbage up. And by "garbage", I mean the kind you see on the side of a highway; Trash so bad that it goes ignored without ANY attempt to pick it up.

The first thing I disliked was the older brother David. I thought to myself how does Will get to be that lonely kid I identified with from the original series? If Will has always had an older brother then it misses the dynamics of what molds a young child's imagination ... A loneliness that allows such a child to live in their own heads or find surrogate friends through robots. David was completely unnecessary and it became more evident when he was left behind surrounded by aliens. David was just a future plot device.

Judy & Penny ... They immediately focused on Judy and I was a little thankful for this. The original series Judy was a background character for Don West to play with. Here she was granted a larger role, but she was still just the love interest. The Judy & Don relationship I remember was built up over time rather than the late-night fling these two began with. I actually preferred Heather Graham's Judy from the 1998 movie; She was a central character not thrown into the cliché "girl meets boy" BS of Hollywood.

Penny was reduced to an infant ... maybe to make Maureen Robinson appear more motherly. It irritated me to no end. Penny was my first television crush. She also had the plain tomboyish look that allowed young girls to identify with ... frak knows there's no way to identify with her Barbie doll older sister played by (boob distraction) Adrianne Palicki.

Will was the main focus of the original series. Here (much like Jayne Brook's Maureen Robinson with baby Penny) he's a background staple to make Brad Johnson's John Robinson look like a father. Sure Johnson reminded me a great deal of Guy Williams, the original John Robinson. I found myself enjoying him because of that. But the dynamic of father & son are left to one moment of a baseball glove being handed down to a boy that doesn't even know what a baseball glove is. This John Robinson at least tried to be there for his son, the original John Robinson constantly overlooked Will adding to the loneliness of the character.

There wasn't really any character here to identify with.

Don West. Why bother talking about this guy? I won't even waste your time. He was that dull.

John & Maureen Robinson? Nope not interesting enough to discuss. Although perhaps to look at the star of the show which was John Robinson. Why make him the focal point? He became an action hero because that's basically all John Woo can do. The original father of the family was a professor. Here he was updated as some retired Marine or some crap apparently to justify the lame slow-mo action scenes.

I suspect Woo grew up with a house full of action heroes that he acted out fight scenes with with no more dialog than "booosh" and "guhhhh". Sure in the original series both John & Don handled the fight sequences ... but Lost In Space was always about the science-fiction NOT some choreographed drop kicking shoot 'em up. It's a Swiss Family Robinson revision that happens in outer-space. The fight/action scenes here were used as FILLER, designed to stretch the story to complete an hour long time period. It made no sense.

THE ROBOT. Anytime anyone remembers 'Lost In Space' ... whether it's the old television series or the failed 1998 film ... the biggest attraction has always been the damn ROBOT. What do we get in it's place? A legless C3PO reject. Seriously WTF? Go to the Lost In Space Wikia and see the image of it. Try not to laugh, I dare you ...

The face is a bent piece of metal with two holes drilled in it for eyes. It was a metal Muppet. A bad joke. Especially considering they blew 2 million on this pilot. 2 freaking mill and we get a glowing 3D Operation™ game Dr Zachary Smith was not in this pilot. Not sure why. But on the single interesting note that could have worked here - that someone evidently overlooked ... While the protagonists were generic alien rubber suits rather than a terrorist doctor ... it left an opportunity for the Dr. Smith role to actually be an alien. Would have been the only interesting thing about this series if they had seen fit to use such a twist.

All in all, I would hope that any future endeavor teaches the idiot executives hired in family that THIS IS NOT HOW IT'S DONE!!! I say Hell Yeah" reboot the show but put (maybe) someone like Ronald D. Moore in charge. Someone that knows character development & a thing or two about science fiction.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Unwatchably bad
tomakalinus16 February 2011
Warning: Spoilers
I thought that another reboot couldn't possibly be worse than the original campy series or the campy '90s movie. I was wrong.

The first three segments are all about the teenagers insufferably whining. There's no action at all during this part, nor are the characters doing anything to make us root for them. It's all bad cliché family drama stuff.

Finally, an alien ship attacks, but we don't know who the aliens are or why they're attacking. They're generic "bad aliens" and do nothing to increase the interest of what's happening.

I find it nearly impossible to believe that this came from John Woo, a director who knows how to shoot more exciting films than this, and Doug Petrie, a really good writer from the Joss Whedon camp. I don't know how this went so wrong, but it did indeed go very wrong.

Seek this out to satisfy your curiosity alone. I can very much see why the WB didn't pick this up for a series.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Loved it!
tracy_hannon12 February 2011
As someone who grew up watching the series, I was very anxious to watch this. After doing so, I have to say, I hated to see that it was over! I always wondered as a child, how Don came into the picture. This was explained in this version. And although I never knew there was a David, I hated to see him left behind. I think that Mr Smith would be missed though. His character made for many a great episode in the past. No one will ever forget that whining man, lol. All said and done, I was very entertained. Would definitely tune in next week...to see what happens next. I cant believe it was never picked up! Maybe someone will try this again in the future?
12 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Kinda run of the mill
I found this while browsing, don't remember where. The quality kinda sucked (352x240 at 1150 kbps) but I was curious about it. Sadly, I wasn't overly impressed with it. It was kinda standard TV, but still almost entertaining enough.

Huge goof: When Will and David are threatened to get sucked out into space, they seem to be suspended in mid-air, just grabbing some handle, However, Will's cables are clearly visible in two or three shots.

Also kinda goofy is the use of 2003 Battlestar Galactica music (Richard Gibbs' "Are You Alive?", "Main Title" and "By Your Command") and right after that, Thomas Newman's music from American Beauty (track no. 9 Bloodless Freak").

The morphing of Penny into a baby is mildy surprising, maybe they were gonna use it as an arc, like Penny gets sucked into so time-space warp and returns as a teen, preteen or fully grown adult, depending on which actress the network owes a favour to.

And Jayne Brook as mom Maureen is hotter than Adrianne 'big chin' Palicki as daughter Judy, that's never a good sign. I'm not sad that it's not picked up, but i'd not have minded watching it on TV. Buying it or giving it space on my hard drive, nah.
7 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
What a twist regarding the son David
anormando28 March 2006
I purchased this In-aired pilot, and after watching this, I found myself wanting to watch more!!! I cannot believe this was never picked up. The actors could not have been a better bunch for this series so once again, The Robinsons are lost in space without an ending at all!!! You need to watch this incredible version of a Sci-fi drama. I thought it had more depth than the new "Battlestar Galactica" The characters are more believable and family oriented. I really enjoyed watching this pilot. The twist at the end was very unexpected, and the second brother (David). I can see now how this could be the beginning of a whole new "Lost In Space" quest. John Woo, you are without a doubt the best!!!
25 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Horrible.
cofunknown21 June 2021
Warning: Spoilers
What can I say? This version of Lost in Space is better left unseen. They add an older son just so he can be separated from the family (possibly killed) and make Penny an infant. On top of that, the acting is horrendous, and there isn't any chemistry between the main actors when they are supposed to be a family.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Lost in Space as a Space Romance
SystemGirls17 April 2021
Before the successful netflix reboot of the classic series, Lost in Space, there was this. Its a lot like the netflix series in some ways, but the characters arent as likable and the story is kind of bad. If your a fan of the Judy/Don romance it might be worth watching it, but I'm a Judy/Don shipper and I didn't like how that was the whole plot. The rest of the Robinson family is ruined! John Robinson is unlikable, Maureen gets not lots to do, and they add a boring teen son named David. Judy and Don are pretty good and so is Will, but for some reason they made Penny into a BABY! Like, a INFANT BABY! WHAT THE HECK? I don't see how Penny can be a baby in this when in other versions she is shown to be older? Did Penny go through a time warp? Or is she a age regressor and in the future that can be done with peoples bodies? The rest of the plot is just family drama and fighting aliens. It might have been a good show but it just isn't Lost in Space and it doesn't fit with the continuities in the other versions. So the romance is pretty good but the rest of it isn't.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Excellent Sci-fi drama, with the right amount of action and build up.
dukeb0y18 July 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Were do I start? This is what Lost In Space could have been. I agree with other reviews, the background of the people and plot is well done. We get a feel of what is going on, but no predictability, like so many movies.

The only copy I know of, is the DVD one, that looks like a poor VHS tape. I sure would like to see the original. This was never released to the public officially. It was a pilot episode and never finished. That's why you see cables and wires holding up the people.

Here is what makes this...GOOD. I sat down to watch this with some friends and kids, they thought it was really good. (They know I love the old show!)

So, a 'might have been' sitting in a WB vault somewhere. Production value is good, overall. I didn't car for the new robot, but everything else, including the new Jupiter II, looks great.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed