From Clerks to Jay and Silent Bob Reboot, the hilarious duo breaks down their friendship and creative method.
User Lists
Related lists from IMDb users
Share this Rating
Title: Knight to F4 (2005)
Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.
Photos
Add Image
Add an image
Do you have any images for this title?
Edit
Cast
| Cast overview, first billed only: | |||
 |
Leland Burnett | ... | Robert Fetcher |
|
|
Dane Reade | ... | Dane Keinschach |
| Brenda Galilee Rhodes | ... | Suzanne | |
| Richard Kline | ... | Truman Fetcher | |
| Shawn G. Smith | ... | Duke | |
| Tom Ingram | ... | Daniel | |
| Gena Shaw | ... | Kelly | |
|
|
Frank Mosca | ... | Frank Chow |
|
|
Susan Burnett | ... | Debbie Chow |
|
|
Mike Schadel | ... | Hotel Clerk #1 / Wayne / Hotel Clerk #2 |
|
|
Diana Brown | ... | Wayne's Mom |
|
|
Fred Dekom | ... | Gary Shylock |
| Debra Wilson | ... | Cheryl Johnson | |
| Larry Thomas | ... | Chess Reporter | |
| Joanna Bool | ... | Christine Ryder | |
Edit
Storyline
Add Full Plot | Add SynopsisTaglines:
When losing is the best part of winning!Genres:
ComedyParents Guide:
Add content advisory for parents »
Edit
Edit
See more on IMDbPro »
See full technical specs »
Details
Country:
USALanguage:
EnglishRelease Date:
2005 (USA) See more »Edit
Box Office
Budget:
$1,000,000 (estimated)Company Credits
Show more on
IMDbPro »
Technical Specs
Color:
ColorFrequently Asked Questions
This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.On IMDb TV, you can catch Hollywood hits and popular TV series at no cost. Select any poster below to play the movie, totally free!
Enjoy a night in with these popular movies available to stream now with Prime Video.
It's sad that so much work takes so long to get to the screen, but here it finally is. So many self-financed films like this just fade away and are never seen. Often because they are made by beginners who don't take advantage of the freedom financing your own movie brings. They are too afraid to bring a unique take on the genre they're exploring. That was the case here.
This film however had a relatively substantial budget it seems, so there really is no excuse for it not to have been improved from when I saw it's preview. I'm hoping they re-shot it. When I saw the film I found the acting was irritatingly amateurish and the cinematography TV-ish. Now it has been released I hope it won't be awful, which I why I have given it a two.
Why? Because the premise was great. When you see it in the cinema or on the shelf at your video store take a peek. It must have really improved to have finally got a release.