Swash and unbuckle. In 1763, the Caribbean is awash in pirates. The worst is Stagnetti, backed by his bloodthirsty first mate, Serena. He wants the Scepter of Inca, which gives its owner ...
See full summary »
Pirate hunter Captain Edward Reynolds and his blond first mate, Jules Steel, return where they are recruited by a shady governor general to find a darkly sinister Chinese empress pirate, ... See full summary »
From the makers of 2007's Best Release "Babysitters", 2008's Best Seller and Best Release "Cheerleaders", and 2009's #1 hit "Nurses", comes the bigger, sexier "Teachers". Textbooks, ... See full summary »
Heiress Lisa Carson, girlfriend to Bruce Wayne, is kidnapped by the Riddler. A call on the bat-phone summons Batman and Robin to police headquarters. A flick of the switch hidden in a bust ... See full summary »
Swash and unbuckle. In 1763, the Caribbean is awash in pirates. The worst is Stagnetti, backed by his bloodthirsty first mate, Serena. He wants the Scepter of Inca, which gives its owner great powers. To remove it from remote Calaveras Island, he needs the Dagger of Ataljuapa as well as the aid of a descendant of the family to whom the Scepter was entrusted. So, he kidnaps Manuel Valenzuela, honeymooning with the lovely Isabella. On Stagnetti's trail are pirate hunters, Captain Edward Reynolds and Jules, his commander. Edward's a bit clueless, but he does rescue Isabella. Once Stagnetti has the Dagger, the stage is set for the clash of good and evil.Written by
In the United Kingdom, the distributors were forced to make extensive cuts (removing 1hr 34min) in order for it to be passed at R18. The cuts removed material deemed to be abusive and potentially harmful - sight of a knife blade pressed on nipple / breast and character's bound and gagged while engaging in sexual activity. These cuts were implemented as it was deemed that the performers were incapable of giving or withdrawing consent. Additional cuts were also required to remove sight of urination during masturbation as this was deemed to breach the Obscene Publications Act 1959. See more »
Come on guys, it's porn, not a serious reflection of the times.
I for one, loved this porn. Maybe not worth 70$ but if you can find it cheaper, more power to you. A lot of people are saying, wow, the acting was so bad, they need to make it more like a period piece if they want to do this right, I say, accept it for what it is... PORN! I accepted it and LOVED it. It didn't matter that the girls have tattoos, or say slang. Did it get me hot? yes! It's porn first, a movie second, and that is the point. It's not so you can sit back and go. "Hmmm, that movie really reflected the time period really well" No, it's to get you worked up*which it does!*, or to have a good time with your friends. The acting was horrible (but what can you expect, again its PORN!) I watched this with a friend and we were both laughing the whole time. What can you expect with the bad acting and cheesy lines? As a movie, yeah it kinda stinks, but as a porn (which it was meant to be) it rocked.
-also a skeleton sex scene would have been awesome.
42 of 47 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?
| Report this