The League of Gentlemen's Apocalypse (2005) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
71 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
There's a lot to like about the Apocalypse
Youkilledmypine8 June 2005
For many the hit series was ten years of pitch black humour loaded with affectionate parodies of classic films and a hilarious assortment of over a hundred characters with instantly recognisable catchphrases. Few shows have survived transition from radio to TV to stage show to film but The League of Gentlemen have achieved it with suitable aplomb.

The talented writer/performers had initially envisioned a Monty Python style medieval adventure, but as soon as writing began they soon realised that the characters they have lived with had become very real and deserved better. With that, the Royston Vasey folk realise their very existence is under threat as the writers decide to disregard the fictitious town and work on a 17th Century romp instead.

With the exception of Michael Sheen playing much unseen League member Jeremy Dyson, The League play pretty unlikeable caricatures of their real life personae as well as the familiar faces of Tubbs ("I made a little brown fishy"), nightmare inducing sexual predator Herr Lipp, butcher Hilary Briss and an unlikely hero - irate businessman Geoff Tibbs. New faces appear when the third reality appears, it's here we are treated to charming and funny cameos from veteran actors and popular TV stars. For many this will be a really enjoyable 90 minutes.

'Apocalpse is not going to please everyone though. Working on this level of post modernism has been done a few times before now and may seem all too familiar to audiences raised on irony drenched teen successes kick-started by the likes of Wes Craven having a New Nightmare. It also takes a lot of confidence in an audience to keep up with a high concept story so there are moments of exposition and dialogue that serve only to confirm what most in the audience already know. Comedy as a genre is formulaic but it's now unheard of for a British film not to fall back on the huge back catalogue of TV stars to fill short amounts of screen time. It's also hard to believe the creators ever wanted their offspring killed off, which is perhaps why some of the role reversal doesn't always quite hit the mark. Would Hilary Briss have wanted to try save Royston Vasey in the series?

However, while the show's deliciously dark vein has almost all but disappeared but is arguably more accessible for it. Much will be said about the character development and efforts to humanise the likes of previously one joke incarnations like Herr Lipp. It is here an impossible level of depth can be found along with a harsh streak of biting satire and throwaway put downs. Sentiment is there with a lump in the throat but not sugar coated thickly enough to intrude on the action. The music is good, performances exemplary and the animation is wonderfully seamless; a nice throwback to Terry Gilliam and Ray Harryhausen's work. In short, there's a lot to like about the Apocalypse. Like so many TV to film transfers it was never going to be easy finding the line between preaching to the converted and introducing the uninitiated to the League's slick and distinct voice. But no matter what your preference is, this last trip to the town which 'You'll Never Leave' is oddly lined with hope and ultimately very, very touching.
20 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
one of the best TV series-movies
adamtanaka3 June 2005
There are two ways to turn a TV series into a film.

The first, most common, and least successful, is to basically make a feature-length TV episode- see the disasters of the Steptoe & Son movie. The second is to do something else- something quite different, à la Monty Python.

Thankfully, the creators of the cult TV series have gone for the second option, and they've come up with something unique, clever and funny- it couldn't feel less like a TV episode.

Try to get your head around this- the writers, playing themselves, are confronted by their Royston Vasey alter-egos, played, of course, by them, and told to continue writing the series, otherwise apocalypse will befall the village.

High-concept, contrived and easy to screw up? Yes, but somehow they managed to pull it off. Not for every taste, perhaps, and the ending does drag, but fans will be delighted, and it might even win over the uninitiated.
29 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Thank God for Herr Lipp....
anthrax-63 June 2005
Being a massive fan of the TV series (even to the extent of visiting Hadfield where its filmed!) I was waiting for this to come out from the second I heard about it. Perhaps my expectations were to high, but literally 30 mins into the film and I was thinking 'what have they done?'. Some of the best characters such as Tubbs n' Edward, Pauline n' Mickey n' the bizarre Papa Lazarou had about 10 minutes screen time between them, instead a lot of the film is taken up with the real life creators (aka the league of gentlemen) and some rather poor characters from their new 17th century story. I think what made the TV series so great was all the characters of Royston Vasey, this however did not feature that many in any great detail, and wasn't even really filmed in Royston Vasey for the most part. The whole cinema sat in mostly silence throughout the film, the only highlights in my opinion were the usual sexual innuendos from Herr Lipp (the best being his one involving two scouts at the start and their 'purple skins'!).
10 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Enjoyable...if you know the original Royston Vasey sketches.
Chrysanthepop23 February 2010
I knew nothing about the 'Royston Vasey' sketches when I watched the movie and thus, it was very confusing, messy and difficult for me to follow. However, after seeing the movie, I watched the special features which clarified a lot of things. Then, I watched the film again and this time I was able to enjoy and appreciate it to the fullest. So I would recommend that someone get a glimpse of the TV-series, 'The League of Gentlemen' before watching its movie. It's well executed with some great special effects and makeup and some hilarious cameos. Actors and writers Mark Gatiss, Steve Pemberton and Reece Shearsmith do a fine job. The humour is definitely over the top and the story is larger than life and full of comedies of errors but once you know what to expect, it's much easier to enjoy this morbidly funny ride.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Fans will love it!
supertom-33 June 2005
Based on the weird, wacky and at times wonderful sitcom, League Of Gentlemen's Apocalypse is a fans delight. I was a fan of the first two series myself, with the third still enjoyable but a little too out there for my liking. You could easily assume that with the Royston Vasey locals hitting the big screen and leaving behind TV boundaries of taste' that the movie would really push the darker aspects out. However the is nothing quite as disturbing as series three's sodomy scene. Of course many sitcoms don't translate all too well to the big screen, but LOG was a sitcom with a real movie atmosphere, from the style it was made to all the references, it truly felt like a long movie split into six segments each series. Similarly Spaced's unique style worked superbly for it's translation to the big screen in Shaun Of The Dead. This movie is very filmic thankfully with possibly the most strange plot ever to grace the silver screen. The four writers add plenty of film reference with little nods from everything from The Shining, Labyrinth to the old HarryHuasen films. This is in many ways a whacked out smacked up version of kids favourite The Neverending Story. With the imaginary colliding with the real world.

The plot opens with the scenario that the inhabitants of Royston Vasey, who are alive inside there own little world, like Fantasia in The Neverending Story. When the town of Vasey begins showing signs of the apocalypse, due to the fact that real life writers, Mark, Steve, Reece and Jeremy are not doing any more LOG, a group of the inhabitants must venture into the real world in order to make the writers continue with the LOG otherwise Royston Vasey and its inhabitants will die out. LOG has a great advantage in translating to film and that is the fact it is set in a small universe that is so demented you can do just about anything plot-wise. This film works, it doesn't feel like a half hour skit painfully stretched out. As an example a proposed Friends movie would probably end up being a run of the mill rom-com, far too thin.

As far as being a good film, this is. It's good fun, plenty of gags, while not trying to overload the film with gags. On another impressive note, the film managers to successfully incorporate some softer moments too, in the same way Shaun Of The Dead did. While this film isn't as good as Shaun, it will undoubtedly become a cult classic, even if the theatre I saw this in was shockingly sparse (it was a midday showing though).

As is the case with Brit films it is loaded with cameos including Bernard Hill, Simon Pegg, Peter Kay, and Victoria Wood. The main cast of course are all good, playing a host of their recognised characters, themselves and some new creations. Also co-starring in his Time Bandits villain style is David Warner who has already become a fans favourite amongst those who have seen it. Also the film looks very polished for a budget of only £4.2 million. They have got some great cinematography and sets as well as excellent effects and something I particularly enjoyed was the stop motion monsters, very much a loving homage to the legendary Ray Harryhausen. I personally would love to see another Harryhausen movie. I'm fed up with all the CGI we have now, as much as it is a good tool when used right but I would love to see a film go back to the basics again, and I'm sure others would too.

LOG's Apocalypse is great fun and very nuts. Fans will love this, as will movie enthusiasts. ***1/2
6 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Ahead Of Its Time
liamnoble12 June 2022
The League of Gentlemen was a fantastic comedy series set in the fictional town of Roston Vasey, it was very weird and very dark humour, but it translated well for the odd British sense of humour.

The League Of Gentlemen Apocalypse is a follow on from the hit show, carrying on in the same weird, dark and bizzare vein. The comedy struggles to translate through an extended runtime, and its not helped by a muddled script which feels a little half baked.

Additionally, some of the shows most memorable characters are missing from this jaunt, and whilst the film does have some funny moments, its not the best content these creations have to offer. Unless you're a die-hard fan of the show, I'd recommend sticking to the TV show for your laughs. However, more staunch 'Gentlemen' fans will find something to enjoy here.

I can't shake the feeling having recently rewatched this, that perhaps it was a little too meta and clever for its time. With modern audiences being a bit more savvy I think the reception of this film could have been far more positive in present day. Who knows? 7/10.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
One for the hardcore fans (only).
RatedVforVinny29 November 2019
Unhinged, twisted adaptation of the U.K's finest T.V series. Avoids all the external trappings of transferring a successful comedy to the big screen but there are some difficulties (for sure) in undertaking such an immense operation and falls a tad short of the depraved, demented T.V series. Still lots of deviant comedy here and the faithful fans will surely enjoy.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A Plague Of Gentlemen
pandabat7 June 2005
This movie was the result of the fantastically darkly comic BBC TV series! It's a huge pity that this movie spin-off is let down by a poor script and by production values which are below what the TV series offered. It might have been better to take this idea and implement the best parts of it as the end of another TV series but this may not have been an option for the writers. The plot is basically two stories badly tacked together. There are some comic moments but not enough to make it necessary viewing. The audience I saw it with certainly didn't crack up laughing. As it stands it's a pretty disappointing big screen farewell to the excellent characters that have provided so many laughs on the small screen! Such a pity, I really wanted to be able to say something more positive!
7 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Hello Dave
pjcarline7 June 2005
After three outstanding BBC television series' and a Christmas special, the bizarre and grotesque (yet perversely lovable) characters of bleak fictional town Royston Vasey make the jump to celluloid, along with their creators - The League of Gentlemen.

Mark Gatiss, Steve Pemberton and Reece Shearsmith are the more familiar three-quarters of the foursome, with the central roles shared between the trio. In an added twist, the final member of the team - Jeremy Dyson - is portrayed by actor Michael Sheen.

Where to start? Dyson (Sheen) is in conversation with his writing cohorts, when - horror of horrors - he is paid a visit by two of his grisliest characters. Both Tubbs (Pemberton) and Edward Tattsyrup (Shearsmith) are unhappy at The League's decision to kill off the Vasey inhabitants. "You're not real!" screams Dyson in vain, as the local shopkeepers from hell exact their revenge. Mayhem ensues, as reality and Vasey converge with the vast array of characters entering our world to save theirs.

Confused? You will be, as the camp, innuendo-ridden Teutonic, Herr Lipp (Pemberton) is forced to take on the daily guise of Pemberton (Pemberton), while Pemberton (Pemberton) is kidnapped by cannibalistic butcher Hillary Briss (Gatiss) and Geoff Tipps (Shearsmith).

With shades of an even more demented Misery, Briss attempts to force Pemberton to rewrite the film - thus continuing his life - but leaving Geoff in charge is never a good idea. The erstwhile comedian becomes embroiled in The League's latest, post-Vasey adventure - The King's Evil - entering a typically twisted 17th century England, complete with cameos from Victoria Wood, Peter Kay and David Warner. Known as George of Asda (due to his select line of clothing), Geoff saves the day and is treated as a hero, but for the denouement of the film, he joins characters old and new at the Church of Royston Vasey to meet with their makers.

For fans of the series, the film is a must-see. And yes, it does feature Papa Lazarou (albeit a little too fleetingly). Pen-loving Pauline, Mickey, Barbara and cursed vet Matthew Chinnery are some of the other favourites on show, and The League's portrayal of themselves (plus Sheen's as Dyson) is also a fascinating insight.

The League of Gentlemen are the Radiohead of British comedy - they are ambitious, groundbreaking (witness the excellent Series Three) and not happy to rest on their laurels. They also divide opinion accordingly.

Certainly, their macabre sense of humour is not for every palate, and while not written exclusively for 'fans', a grasp of the storyline would benefit those who have previously viewed the series. Nevertheless, Apocalypse is a film in its own right and The League will no doubt manage to attract a new breed of fan, as well as appeasing and pleasing existing ones.
16 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A welcome departure
studio-416 June 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Unlike a lot of reviewers, I'm not a die-hard L of G fan who attended a special screening but a regular cinema goer who appreciates their 'brand'. Some of the criticism that has been levelled against the film is that it isn't a 90 minute version of the TV programme but a departure into new territory. That for me made it all the more enjoyable. I wouldn't say it was the best film I've ever seen but it was funny more often than not, cleverly written with some interesting departures including a 17 century subplot with some unexpected nods to Ray Harryhausen!! If you like your humour dark and at times Pythonesque then this is the film for you.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Pig in a pokey
Ali_John_Catterall2 December 2009
"Wouldn't it be funny," thought Steve Pemberton, as the League sat down to pen a film script, "if our characters came after us, wanting to know why we wanted to kill them off?" Well, as it turns out, no, not really. In this misguided, post-modern set up (three words: Last Action Hero), bestial butcher Hilary Briss, predatory German exchange-teacher Herr Lipp and broken businessman Geoff Tipps step into the 'real world' to try to prevent the apocalypse of Roysten Vasey and sabotage the Gents' new project - an 18th century romp called The King's Evil. And ironically, this film-within-a-film, featuring a terrific cameo from Warner, is easily the best thing about this. The creators obviously had a blast, but many devotees will wonder why they've tampered with a winning formula.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Odd - but what did you expect?
Uncle_Whippity4 June 2005
The film was apparently spawned from an idea one of the writers had when he 'saw' one of his creations in a supermarket. The inhabitants of Royston Vasey head into 'our' world to persuade the writers not to stop writing about them and thus destroy their world.

If that sounds a bit too serious, don't be put off. Within the first few minutes we get: Bernice (the vile female vicar) letting rip at an unfortunate penitent during confession; Chinnery (the vet who inadvertently destroys every animal he touches) attempting to collect semen from a giraffe; Mickey (thick beyond belief) being, ah, thick; and Tubbs (inbred sister-wife and local shopkeeper) being sweet as ever - but still disgusting.

Some of the regular characters are missing, but a new idea by the Gents introduces some 16th-Century characters - and we have the Gents themselves in the action too. If you're new to The League of Gentlemen, this is an easy introduction and a lot of fun. If you're a long-standing fan, this has everything you've come to expect - including the joys of Jeremy Dyson spotting.

All told, it's got the same faintly surreal humour that's the hallmark of the series, plus some moments of quite touching 'introspection'. Herr Lipp, for example, maintains a gentle dignity on learning that he's regarded by his creators as a 'one-joke character'. While most of the characters stay as they are, some develop in unexpected ways that are perfectly natural when they happen.

This film is a 'swan song' for Royston Vasey, but it's also a showcase for the Gents who prove that (gasp!) they can write other stuff - and it can be very funny. (But you knew that anyway.)
26 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Definitely not a local film for local people.
tenten7630 May 2005
I had high hopes for this film, reduced to moderate when I saw a trailer. Now that I've seen the movie, I'm sad to say it's not quite what I wanted. I'm a fan of the TV series, and had hoped for more of their trademark excruciating, cringeworthy, quite dark humour (mixed with laugh-out-loud moments). Although it begins well, featuring lots of the characters (Edward & Tubbs, Papa Lazarou, Herr Lipp, Hilary Briss, Jeff, Barbara, Mickey, Pauline, the Reverend, Chinnery) it soon settles down into Briss, Jeff and Herr Lipp as the main characters. I take the League's point that they didn't want to feature characters who were already 'stars' in the series, but by the same token, the three they chose have all been 'sanitised' from their Royston Vasey caricatures. Briss seems less like Jack the Ripper than he should, Jeff never really flips over into frustrated madman, and Herr Lipp is now actually very sympathetic. I didn't really care for the 17th Century storyline (although I have no problem with David Warner, ever). What made the series so good was that you got distilled vignettes of each character, mixing (Short Cuts - style) into the next one. Putting them all into a longer plot (and having to give the characters extra dimensions to do so) just weakened the hideousness of it all. You may think that the series' style wouldn't stretch to 90 minutes - but actually, if you remember the series they each had a story arc (usually building up to something diabolical with Edward & Tubbs). The notion that a flawed character could step into the real-life shoes of his creator and learn more about his family/how to treat his wife etc. was all a bit too 'Mr.Mom' for me. Way too twee, especially for what is otherwise one of the darkest, verbally-savage comedy series I have ever seen. Although there were quick nods to The Shining, Scanners and other films, I think they could have really pushed the Wicker Man aspects which are the backbone of the Royston Vasey experience.

Ultimately, I came away disappointed - but a friend of mine (who has never seen the series) thought it was really good, so I guess it depends which camp you fall in. I always think it's a shame when creators turn their back on their strongest creations just because they are bored with them. They forget; there's a good reason why those were your strongest creations in the first place AND the fans may not be as bored as you are.. If the League really are bored of the series; do something else. Let's not flog the characters to death in weakened film versions - you're not Star Trek.
4 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
A League of Gentle Jokes
justin_uk5 June 2005
I am a massive fan of the LoG. I thought the first two series provided some of the best comedy this country has ever seen and the third series, though different, was wonderfully dark and imaginative. The thought of seeing Tubbs, Edward and Briss on the big screen made July 3 something to wait for. Yet, somewhere, it all went horribly wrong. The writers had no story and no real ideas. The part set in old England showed the glimmers of genius that we know the League are capable of but these scenes did not fit well with the film. Geoff provided the best of too few, largely poor jokes and Lipp and Briss's performances were big let-downs. If you love the League, save yourself the time and money and watch episodes from the TV series again. And again. A massive disappointment.
6 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Hello Dave ...
emmadrg12 June 2005
Warning: Spoilers
I'm a huge fan of the LoG and was eagerly awaiting this film. Unfortunately, it was a bit of a let-down. Don't get me wrong, it was quite entertaining, and it was great to see some of the old characters on the big screen. But it was just a bit too random. It seemed to be a bit all over the place at times. There were quite a few laugh-out-loud moments, and Geoff Tipps was better than I remembered from the TV shows. However, I would have liked more Papa Lazarou and Edward and Tubbs, but that's just me.

All in all, go see it if you are a die-hard fan. If you didn't like the TV shows, or you have never seen them, then you wouldn't get much out of the film, and it certainly isn't a good way to introduce the odd characters that inhabit Royston Vasey. It's bizarre, but better than having all your limbs cut off with a rusty spoon.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Let it be
lolshaughnessy26 November 2011
Warning: Spoilers
To say that this movie is bad is to say that this movie isn't your type of thing, but to say it is a masterpiece is giving it too much credit, even if the people who say this are fans of the original show. This film in my opinion suffers from one thing and that is continuity errors that tie in with the series, that some fans of the show may or may not be able to ignore. The first error comes from the idea that Tubbs and Edward are back despite the face that we saw them killed at the beginning of series 3. The second is Pauline speaking to Mickey, at the end of series 3 they were married and in the beginning we see them speak but we see no sign of them being together and no mention of whether or not a divorce was involved at all. The third continuity error we see is that the vicar is back, at the end of the Christmas special we see her taken away by Papa Lazarou (excuse possible spelling error), which is carried on into the third series where we see posters outside the church with her picture displayed as a person missing poster. All in all however all the major characters are back in this film and it is an enjoyable experience for any fan of the show if these continuity errors are ignored and the film is watched casually rather than in any depth, and if you have never seen The League Of Gentlemen you will be able to watch this film without picking up on any of these errors, however if you are a fan of the show as I am myself you may want to go into this film with an open mind.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
THE WORST film I have seen in years
skint_graduate8 June 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Don't get me wrong, I love the TV series of League Of Gentlemen. It was funny, twisted and completely inspired. I was looking forward to the movie, the premise was interesting and I looked forward to see what they had done with the characters and where the bizarre storyline would take them.

It was a total disappointment, for starters the three weakest characters in the series were the leads and it only contained bit parts for the other characters (why not pick mickey & Pauline, papa Lazaro or tubs and Edward for the main parts!?). It was unfunny throughout, half baked gags and poor slapstick humour.

The real clincher was the plain ridiculous period drama / comedy (and i will use the word comedy loosely). It distracted from the main storyline and felt awkward, not to mention painfully unfunny. The direction of the movie is appalling, and often feels that the lines were delivered by the characters within one take. Very rushed.

Then - the three headed Plasticine-esquire monster. What the hell was all that about? plain ridiculous, it felt like the League of gentlemen tagged it on at the end.

All in all I found myself looking at my watch and sighing with disappointment throughout my experience of the film. What was once an amazing Television series has been tainted by a terribly unfunny film.

If i could give it 0 out of 10 i would. Do not waste your money seeing this.
8 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Apocalypse definitely not the end of the world
stevet-1426 May 2005
Just saw 'The League of Gentlemen: Apocalypse' at a special screening in Manchester, with Mark Gatiss and Reece Shearsmith of the League in attendance.

At the back was Peter Kay (who has a brief cameo in the film) affectionately heckling at the back during the Q & A session after the film.

The film was complicated (in a good way) and very very funny. It follows Geoff Tipps, Hilary Briss and Herr Lipp as they try and save fictional Rosyton Vasey from the disinterest of their creators.

The League play a wide range of their characters and themselves (or character based on themselves) and are ably supported by the cream of British character and comedy actors such as Bernard Hill, Victoria Wood and David Warner.

Warner is a particular stand out reminding me of his smooth and cutting turn in 'Time Bandits'.

The film swims in and out of various realities and allows some of the denizen's of Rosyton Vasey some space to grow beyond their usual limits of their comedy shtick.

Steve Pemberton's Herr Lipp has a great Bretchian moment near the end of the movie and has to make a decision about his purpose and meaning in life which brings a lump to the throat at an unexpected moment and surprises you with its tender affection for the characters.

This echoes something Mark and Reece said in the Q & A afterwards, that the plot of the league being tired of their famous characters is spurious and that the whole film is really a love letter to them.

For a format that started as a radio character-based sketch show, these guys have really evolved the idea so far as to sustain a movie which takes you on a journey through fiction, 'reality', comedy, tragedy and a pleasing journey for two of the less obvious characters to carry a long form story from their 70 odd existing creations.

The fans of the show will love it. It pays off dedication and attention to detail in spades, the uninitiated may be a little lost, but the joy of the LoG was always the ability to almost instantly tune into their acutely observed characters and take the stylistic leap into farce and expressionistic movie homage.

There are homages a plenty in this one including 'The Shining' and 'La Belle et la Bete', to name but two I spotted and they ably demonstrate their love for cinema and history with a segment in 1690's England that makes perfect sense when you're engaged with the movie.

What can I say, I marvelled, boggled, emoted and snickered throughout and they have definitely pulled off what many have failed at. A successful British TV comedy to cinema translation.

If you've watched and enjoyed 'The League of Gentlemen' in the past, go see it; you will enjoy.

If you haven't, rent/buy a DVD and then go see it.

Well done guys and thanks for the charming and humorous Q & A.
30 out of 45 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
How could they get it so wrong?
gpshovlin12 June 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Overall, I felt this was a wasted opportunity. I feel ever so let down by the League as I felt they had their fingers on the pulse, but this film is ever so slightly up its own backside, and you can't help but feel some of it was for their own amusement.

Although I welcomed the fact that they wanted to do something different (as opposed to sending the characters off on holiday, a la Are You Being Served film version), they just don't manage to pull it off, and the irony is it probably would have been a safer bet sending the characters off on holiday.

Surely they could have stretched a full length plot around a character such as Papa Lazorous (sic) or even Geoff, who has pretty much the only funny lines throughout. I could see what they tried to do with Herr Lip, in that he faces up to the fact that he is a one joke, one dimensional character, but that was as clever and interesting as got.

The medieval section sucked big style, and reeked of a poor Monty Python sketch. Definitely more Meaning of Life than Life of Brian.
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
In a League of it's own!
jasonakenny30 May 2005
I have to admit that when I first heard about the Apocalypse film it was a worry.

I mean, they have a lot to live up to, don't they? When they first did a stage show they won the Perrier award and when they did radio they won a Sony award. When they ventured onto our telly's they won a Bafta award, a Royal Television Society Award and the Golden Rose of Montreux.

When the first series aired in January 1999 it was mind-blowing! A real breath of fresh air in British Comedy, and when the second series aired a year later it built on that foundation and sealed the shows cult status around the world, our web stats show that we have received visitors from every single country on the planet! The 'Local show for Local People' showcased the Gents talent for live performance and opened doors for the gents to do more live performing such as 'Art' in the west end.

The fans favourite has always been the Christmas Special, less of a sketch show and more a tribute to classic horror films yet still wrapped up in the delicious League style.

And then of course there was the 'difficult' third series, still a hit with the loyal hardcore fans of course, but maybe a little bit ahead of its time for a mainstream TV audience.

As I say, a lot to live up to.

So now we have the film and...Well a film is different isn't it? It will be seen by much larger numbers than the radio or TV shows and with the third series in mind I was worried.

Well as you know I was lucky enough to get to see the film yesterday at a press screening in London and all my doubts were blown away (literally) in the first few minutes! I am not going to give plot lines away as some reviewers have done, nor am I going to tell you the catch phrases (although there is really only one) but I will try to tell you what they have managed to achieve with this film! Leaving the cinema on Monday night I could only imagine writing 'Oh my god, it's brilliant, its amazing, its the best thing they have ever done, better than the first, second and specials all rolled into one!' Of course I owe my visitors a much better explanation than that! So, why is it brilliant? This is a film for everyone, the casual fan, the obsessive fan the occasional fan and even for someone who is sat in the wrong cinema! You don't have to have watched the series to enjoy this film; it works on so many levels.

This film reminded me why I am a League of Gentlemen Fan! You can tell that filming was a true labour of love too; the attention to detail is incredible. The sets for the TV show were always detailed but I am going to have to watch the film again just to look at the background! The story moves at a swift pace, the action carrying us from Royston Vasey to the real world where we meet the 'Creators' who are of course the League themselves! Along the way we manage to bump into favourite characters from the show but always within the central story unlike the TV sketch show.

I was glad that the film was dark in places, a little scary and a little strange...only fitting for The League of Gentlemen. The Gents also managed to get their revenge on the BBC censors, not as much slipping in the word 'Mongoloid' as screaming it from the roof tops! Some may think the Gents portrayal of themselves a little indulgent but that's the joke and with that comes my only worry, the in jokes I mention below may puzzle some viewers and they might come over a little too clever...but I shouldn't worry, there is always a poo joke waiting just around the corner and speaking of jokes, they come thick and fast, and in a mixture of clever references, wig jokes, bum jokes, visual jokes and cock gags! I haven't laughed out loud in a cinema since...well, I can't remember! The fans that have been 'with' the League since the beginning are rewarded with loads of 'in' jokes, some that work on two levels, a mainstream audience may laugh at a reference to a compact disc for one reason whilst fans of the Local show will laugh for another reason altogether! The cameos are genius! Peter Kay and Simon Pegg form the strangest double act you have ever seen, Simon getting one of the films biggest laughs just by making a noise! I was a little worried about the 1690's aspect of the film when I first heard about it but as a story within a story I was just getting into it when...but that would be telling! All I need to say is that it fits wonderfully and adds to the overall feel of the film! I am not a professional reviewer of films, so I am finding it difficult to put into words how much I enjoyed this film but for now I will just say that if the supposed benchmark for British Comedy films in recent years was the excellent 'Shaun of the Dead' then I am sorry but a new benchmark has just been set by the inventive, hilarious and sometimes a little scary...The League of Gentlemen's Apocalypse.

Jason Kenny 2005
16 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Boo! Hiss!
graemejwalker8 July 2007
This review took longer to write than I took to watch this film. It's just plain bad. The plot is terrible in comparison to the TV shows. It is flat, unfunny and boring.

It is clear that the LoG ran out of ideas long before this film was green lit. Viewers should read this as an example of not knowing when to stop.

Bad editing, bad music, bad acting. Zero dynamism, zilch chemistry.

A film that doesn't know what it is, made without any love to some mysterious end that leaves you depressed and feeling kind of angry that so much money was wasted.

The LoG obviously were made an offer they couldn't refuse, or perhaps their egos have simply got the better of them. It's a bleak marketing push that perhaps would have been better when the LoG were fresher and more inspired.

I however, did know when to stop, and did.

Please! Someone try to convince me of this film's finer points!
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
i want my 2 hrs back, league of gentlemen u owe me £5
mrrugby-114 June 2005
please re-watch all 3 series and do not go see this movie, the trailer is completely misleading and the 3 weakest characters in the series stretch a badly thought out 25min TV episode into the most painful 2hrs of my life, truly an awful film. tubbs and edward are in it for a few mins, micky has 1 line, and her lipp just reels out the same tired old puns, also mr briss's accent just changes about 5 times in the film tons of badly acted extras, and really a few laughs that they seem to recycle for 2 hrs i honestly feel this series has been completely ruined by this god-awful piece of crap..........batman and robin all is forgiven
5 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Special Stuff
lord_loss4 June 2005
The best British Comedy Film ever! For years English comedy television programs have turned into films and have flopped, 'Are You Being Served?' 'Dads Army', the list goes on. However the popular dark humoured BBC television show; 'The League of Gentlemen' has managed to not only create a film which has managed to not be a flop but has also managed to be the best British Comedy Film ever! With its dark and horrific twists and turns The League of Gentlemen's Apocalypse is British Talent at its best! Its intriguing demonic storyline written by the League of Gentlemen (Mark Gatiss, Steve Pemberton, Reece Shearsmith and Jeremy Dyson) matches with the Gents (and guest cameos) superb acting! This I hope is not the end of Royston Vasey, not after this great success anyway! Don't think that if you have not seen The League of Gentlemen on the telly that you will not understand whats going on. Its all well explained and by the end of the film you will be happy with the result but you are still left hungry for more... Mmmm, Special Stuff.
14 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
You really have to like these things
enciclopedia30 October 2005
The movie is just plain awful from the start. I assume you have to be a fan of some previous movie-series in order to watch this movie. Other than that, as a first-time-viewer it's rubbish.

In the first minutes of the movie, tricked by the "league of gentlemen's" name you expect something more of the "invisible man" nature. Only to find some stupid jokes about some "brown fish" in the toiler and such.

It just seems to display an absurd situation without any finality. For somebody that just wants to see a movie, this could prove to be a bad choice. Not quite your normal evening-movie.

I don't see humour in this, just plain stupidity (and there's more if you have the nerve to watch it).
5 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
this film is amazing
matthewrose101 June 2005
i went to see the league of gentlemen's apocalypse last night at a preview screening with a Q & A afterwards at the National Film Theatre.

Having been a huge fan i was worried that the film might not live up to expectations but how wrong i was! Although much of the action is set away from the usual home turf of Royston Vasey and contains less characters than the TV series, it is undeniably every bit as good as the TV series.

The film follows three lesser known characters, Hilary Briss, Geoff Tipps and Herr Lipp as they attempt to save Royston Vasey from an apocalypse being rained down on them due to the writers stopping writing the show. The film also contains favourites Tubbs and Edward as well as Papa Lazarou and Pauline but in much smaller amounts. I felt this worked well because it meant the audience didn't overdose on the extremely grotesque characters. However, of course, there are still plenty of fantastically twisted moments scattered within the film.

I would recommend this film to anyone whether they have seen the TV series or not. My hat's off to the league for making such a fantastic film.
9 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed