4.3/10
34,020
317 user 158 critic

Basic Instinct 2 (2006)

Trailer
2:19 | Trailer

On Disc

at Amazon

Novelist Catherine Tramell is once again in trouble with the law, and Scotland Yard appoints psychiatrist Dr. Michael Glass to evaluate her. Though, like Detective Nick Curran before him, Glass is entranced by Tramell and lured into a seductive game.
Reviews
Popularity
2,951 ( 343)
8 wins & 6 nominations. See more awards »

Videos

Photos

Edit

Cast

Cast overview, first billed only:
Stan Collymore ... Kevin Franks
Sharon Stone ... Catherine Tramell
Neil Maskell ... Detective Ferguson
David Thewlis ... Roy Washburn
Jan Chappell Jan Chappell ... Solicitor
David Morrissey ... Michael Glass
Terence Harvey ... Henry Rose
Hugh Dancy ... Adam Towers
Ellen Thomas ... Prosecutor
Mark Sangster Mark Sangster ... Court Reporter One
Tim Berrington Tim Berrington ... Court Reporter Two
Indira Varma ... Denise Glass
Charlotte Rampling ... Milena Gardosh
Heathcote Williams Heathcote Williams ... Jakob Gerst
Flora Montgomery ... Michelle Broadwin
Edit

Storyline

Crime novelist Catherine Tramell is living in London, and becomes the center of police investigation (yet again) when her football player boyfriend drowns in a car accident and it is revealed that he was already dead because of a drug overdose before Tramell drove the car into water. Police psychoanalyst Dr. Michael Glass is called for examining Tramell, and is intrigued by the seductive and manipulative woman. On the other hand , his friend Det. Roy Washburn is sure Tramell is guilty. Tramell asks Glass to treat her for her 'risk addiction' problem, and with each therapy session , Glass gets more and more suspicious about her intentions. As more and more murders are committed, including that of Glass's ex-wife, Glass becomes obsessed with proving Tramell's guilt even though the evidence is contradictory . Written by Soumitra

Plot Summary | Plot Synopsis

Taglines:

Everything interesting begins in the mind. See more »


Motion Picture Rating (MPAA)

Rated R for strong sexuality, nudity, violence, language and some drug content | See all certifications »

Parents Guide:

View content advisory »
Edit

Details

Country:

UK | Germany | Spain | USA

Language:

English

Release Date:

31 March 2006 (USA) See more »

Also Known As:

Basic Instinct 2: Risk Addiction See more »

Edit

Box Office

Budget:

$70,000,000 (estimated)

Opening Weekend:

£487,031 (United Kingdom), 2 April 2006, Limited Release

Opening Weekend USA:

$3,201,420, 2 April 2006

Gross USA:

$5,971,336

Cumulative Worldwide Gross:

$38,629,478
See more on IMDbPro »

Company Credits

Show more on IMDbPro »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

| (unrated extended cut)

Sound Mix:

SDDS | Dolby Digital | DTS

Color:

Color

Aspect Ratio:

2.35 : 1
See full technical specs »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

A threesome scene involving Michael, Catherine and a female friend of hers portrayed by Anne Caillon was shot but deleted. It can be seen in the DVD special features. See more »

Goofs

Unless Catherine is wearing wigs or hair extensions, the length of her hair is inconsistent. For example, at the party she attends with Gerst, she has a very short fringe just extending beyond her hairline. The following day, at her appointment with Michael (where she asks him how he fantasizes about her), she has eyebrow-length bangs parted in the middle. See more »

Quotes

Catherine Tramell: You know how some guys are into blondes, and some guys are into killers?
See more »

Connections

Referenced in Edición Especial Coleccionista: Instinto Básico (2012) See more »

Soundtracks

Violin Concerto No. 5 - Tempo di Menuetto
Written by Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart
Featured Violin Solo performed by Rolf Wilson
See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

See more »

User Reviews

 
Writers could not pull off what Joe Eszterhas created.
1 July 2015 | by doorbomb62See all my reviews

There's really no way to pull off a sequel to the original classic, Basic Instinct. To do so would require much more than Sharon Stone who sizzles no matter what she is doing. She a fine actress, but surrounding her with unfamiliar actors in London, and handling a script that lacks everything witty and tight that Joe Eszterhas weaved in the original picture, is just disastrous.

Our story here has Ms. Tramell, notorious author from Basic Instinct at the epicenter of a death, accidental, or perhaps...intentional??? She is handled by Scotland yard in this one, a far cry from the San Fransisco PD and Detective Nick Curan, who is sorely absent. Rather than prance around with her sexuality tugging at the police, and seducing them blindly, she is more a bully here, and she pushes authoritative figures, especially Michael Glass the professional assigned to her case, into her game this time around.

Sharon Stone turns in a mostly witty and sharp (no pun intended) continuation of Catherine Tramell, Complete with incomparable physique, sexy sultry voice, and some more blonde poison. Her co-stars, however, do not measure up.U.K. veteran Charlotte Rampling is the only other cast member/character on Stones level. The rest of the cast are like fish out of water. I think it's part of why the film doesn't work. We have very stiff European authoritative figures, bent on the unraveling of the case, as well they should be, except it doesn't feel like Basic Instinct, and the good moments that are had, are reminders that it might have been better had they stuck with the original idea which was to have been set in NYC.

The production design and art direction are diabolical though (again, no pun intended), and it's a scene set greatly, if only the expectations were met. Ultimately I feel the writing was the biggest let down. It's as if Leora Barish and Henry Bean didn't know the character of Catherine, and thusly could not completely tell her story. Whatever they have for every one else is a more or less lacking shadow of what the original was.

Michael Caton-Jones is okay, but this flick, released in 2006, looks like EVERY other action thriller from that time period, and that's sad. The original was a cut (there I go again)above the rest of what was released back in 1992. It had so much style and charisma, and even charm, mixed with an extremely interwoven and complex, even abstract plot/story. This is just a run-of-the-mill follow up sequel that is as bland and boring as every other product that was churned out by studios at the time. It's all in your face at value, which is not very high. There is noting beyond the cheese & crackers. The cigar is just the cigar, and in this films case, it needed to be a highly intoxicating cigarette.


6 of 6 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you? | Report this
Review this title | See all 317 user reviews »

Contribute to This Page



Recently Viewed