See why Regina King gushes over "Power" and "On My Block," and wants you to see If Beale Street Could Talk.
Related lists from IMDb users
Title: Southland Tales (2006)
Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.
| Cast overview, first billed only: | |||
 |
Carlos Amezcua | ... | Himself |
| Curtis Armstrong | ... | Dr. Soberin Exx | |
|
|
Robert Benz | ... | Tab Taverner |
| Todd Berger | ... | Bing Zinneman | |
| Joe Campana | ... | Brandt Huntington | |
| Chris Andrew Ciulla | ... | UPU 4 Officer 3 (as Chris Ciulla) | |
| Rebekah Del Rio | ... | Vanessa Vera Cruz | |
|
|
Aaron Dillar | ... | Jimmy Hermosa |
| Nora Dunn | ... | Cyndi Pinziki | |
|
|
Shari Dunn | ... | USI Dent Reporter |
|
|
Michele Durrett | ... | Starla Von Luft |
|
|
Jon Falcone | ... | Soldier Falcon |
|
|
Leila Feinstein | ... | Herself |
|
|
Jaret Gardiner | ... | Shane Laverne |
| Janeane Garofalo | ... | General Teena MacArthur | |
Southland Tales is an ensemble piece set in the futuristic landscape of Los Angeles on July 4, 2008, as it stands on the brink of social, economic and environmental disaster. Boxer Santaros is an action star who's stricken with amnesia. His life intertwines with Krysta Now, an adult film star developing her own reality television project, and Ronald Taverner, a Hermosa Beach police officer who holds the key to a vast conspiracy. Written by TheGuyInThePj's
Explore popular movies available to rent or buy on Prime Video.
This movie, maybe more than any other I've seen, is a commitment. If you think that 144 minutes is a lot to commit to a movie, the running time is only the tip of the iceberg.
In the DVD cut of the movie, a lot of things are obscured: what the big picture is, why characters are motivated to do certain things, why multiple identities are a recurring theme, why certain characters/actions are necessary.
What is in the DVD cut is an extensively detailed alternate world. Unfortunately, to make the actions in that alternate world make sense, you basically have to either watch the movie multiple times, or at least know what you're dealing with.
There are at least 4 layers to everything that's going on: 1) political/social commentary on contemporary American society and the apocalyptic undercurrent therein; 2) sarcastic/caustic pop culture references (Philip K. Dick is a big one, but also subtle things... for instance, the Rock was Sean William Scott's protector in "The Rundown" and plays a similar role here); 3) a self-consciousness or self-referentialism: actors cast against type, some similar themes to Donnie Darko, actions that play out in the film are largely based off of the AWFUL screenplay written by one of the characters (as seen in the graphic novel prequels); 4) the actual plot of the movie, which has deep ties to the Book of Revelation, and makes much more sense if the graphic novels are read first.
These layers are pretty consummately intertwined. This is part of what makes this movie to be compelling enough to make me want to put in the necessary effort. Its imagery was provocative, and because Richard Kelly has created such a densely layered world for himself, putting in the time actually is incredibly rewarding.
It should also be said that this film, like Blade Runner or There Will Be Blood, does not let its plot set specifications on its scope, or what it's about. If you hone in on what the director thinks its scope/purpose is, it's much easier to appreciate.
I'm not sure exactly how to rate this movie, since as a stand alone movie it is a failure, but if you take the time to get inside Kelly's mind, it's worthwhile. So. My advice? View it as an investment or don't view it at all. Don't throw it on for an evening's entertainment. If you do, you might be entertained, but you'll probably be confused and angry.