60 user 22 critic

Penn & Teller: Bullshit! 

1:05 | Trailer

Watch Now

With Prime Video

The comedy illusionist duo explore various topics and debunk what they consider misconceptions about them.




8   7   6   5   4   3   2   1  
2010   2009   2008   2007   2006   2005   … See all »
Nominated for 13 Primetime Emmys. Another 1 win & 6 nominations. See more awards »





Series cast summary:
Penn Jillette ...  Himself - Host 89 episodes, 2003-2010
Teller ...  Himself - Host 89 episodes, 2003-2010


Using a combination of set ups, descriptions, rants and film of practitioners, Penn & Teller show the bullshit that's everywhere. The initial show covers mediums or Talkers to the Dead. Penn Jillette explains in the first program that while calling someone a liar or a con man is actionable, "bullshit" is safe. Each show has a topic such as Mediums, Feng Shui, Medical devices or Penis Enlargement. Using humor and experts, they debunk the bullshit. Written by jlvogel@comcast.net

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis


Magic's an illusion. This Bullshit is for real! See more »


TV-MA | See all certifications »

Parents Guide:

View content advisory »


Official Sites:






Release Date:

24 January 2003 (USA) See more »

Also Known As:

Penn & Teller: Bullsh*t! See more »

Filming Locations:

Las Vegas, Nevada, USA

Company Credits

Show more on IMDbPro »

Technical Specs



See full technical specs »

Did You Know?


While we never see Teller speak, his voice is occasionally heard while his face is obscured or while he is off-camera. See more »


Penn Jillette: Life coaches are like hookers, which is good, except you're renting their ears instead of their genital and you never get to come!
See more »

Crazy Credits

Disclaimer at the end of episode 2.6: "The characters and events depicted in the damn bible are fictitious. Any similarity to actual persons, living or dead, is purely coincidental." See more »


Referenced in Atop the Fourth Wall: Psychoman #1 (2012) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

See more »

User Reviews

Entertainment, not Science
17 October 2005 | by Voivod-2See all my reviews

Speaking of bullshit, that's kind of what this show is. Not that it's bad-- it's good entertainment. But less critical viewers will need to be reminded that it's entertainment, not thorough scientific research.

While Penn and Teller do sometimes offer scientific research to bolster their arguments, the tend to present it in a manner that contradicts the purpose of serious investigation. I take issue with the way they enter their investigations with the assumption that something is "bullshit" and how they subsequently mold every piece of information that becomes available to them to reinforce their pre-determined conclusion. A real investigation would not involve them going into their research with the determination to prove it a fraud; it would involve a suspicion which they either prove or disprove after careful examination of the evidence.

I feel that the show manipulates your judgments by doctoring evidence, cutting and pasting phrases out-of-context, repeatedly showing loaded footage, making dismissive commentary without backing, relying on 'straw men' to win arguments, calling people "assholes" for having differing opinions, creating irrelevant "experiments" whose outcomes, at first glance seem to corroborate their point, but upon re-assessment, are not logically congruous with the evaluations you will make based on them (in other words, the experiments are misleading).

P&T essentially bully the viewer onto their side by creating an atmosphere in which you will feel dumb if you disagree; their ridiculously biased presentation ensures it. I'm not saying that most of the stuff they take on isn't bullshit, but their methodology is more akin to "Inside Edition" than, say "BBC News"; it's like a sloppy email forward, filled with ad-hominem attacks and hot-headed rhetoric, not a well-researched feature article. If it seems funny, well-intentioned, and consumer-advocatory, it is; but it's also manipulative and intellectually dishonest, at least for something that you given to understand is an unbiased documentary. That, in and of itself, should be a good reason to watch with caution if you're trying to get anything out of it besides entertainment.

27 of 46 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you? | Report this
Review this title | See all 60 user reviews »

Contribute to This Page

Recently Viewed