3.6/10
318
32 user 9 critic

Claustrophobia (2003)

Trailer
0:31 | Trailer

On Disc

at Amazon

A serial killer armed with a crossbow pistol is murdering people from their own rooftops. When three young coworkers at a poorly-attended slumber party start hearing footsteps on the roof, they fear the worst.

Director:

Mark Tapio Kines
Reviews

Videos

Photos

Add Image Add an image

Do you have any images for this title?

Edit

Cast

Credited cast:
Melanie Lynskey ... Lauren
Sheeri Rappaport ... Gina
Mary Lynn Rajskub ... Grace
Will Collyer ... Man in Black (as Will Heermance)
Judith O'Dea ... Alena Gray (as Judy O'Dea)
Phillip Darlington ... Second News Reporter
Rest of cast listed alphabetically:
Daniel DeFabio Daniel DeFabio ... Radio Show Caller (voice)
William Mehner William Mehner ... News Anchor (voice)
Niki Moore Niki Moore ... TV News Interviewee (as Niki Simental)
Michelle Wade Byrd Michelle Wade Byrd ... Young Woman on Couch (as Michelle Wade)
Marc Wade Marc Wade ... First News Reporter
Lucas Young ... Lauren's Neighbor
Edit

Storyline

A serial killer armed with a crossbow pistol is murdering people from their own rooftops. When three young coworkers at a poorly-attended slumber party start hearing footsteps on the roof, they fear the worst.

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis

Taglines:

Everyone is a target. See more »

Genres:

Horror | Thriller

Motion Picture Rating (MPAA)

Rated R for language and violence | See all certifications »
Edit

Details

Official Sites:

Cassava Films

Country:

USA

Language:

English

Release Date:

18 June 2003 (USA) See more »

Also Known As:

Serial Slayer See more »

Filming Locations:

California, USA See more »

Edit

Box Office

Budget:

$95,000 (estimated)
See more on IMDbPro »

Company Credits

Show more on IMDbPro »

Technical Specs

Color:

Color

Aspect Ratio:

1.33 : 1
See full technical specs »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

Shot in June, 2002. See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
The film had some moments, but essentially it was amateurish.
8 August 2003 | by jazzlon10See all my reviews

The script was good, a lot of the photography was good, but the lighting was abysmal. There was no effort to correct the differences in exposure between interior and exterior. The acting was a little mannered. I assume that the movie was shot digitally. The editing was very effective in some sequences and less than good in others. It almost seemed that the editor occasionally got bored and quit trying. If I seem overly critical, let me hasten to add that the movie had more good qualities than bad. However, the bottom line word is "amateurish." It really wasn't worth the hassle of driving to Culver City and shelling out five bucks.


2 of 8 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you? | Report this
Review this title | See all 32 user reviews »

Contribute to This Page



Recently Viewed