Contestants compete to answer questions on various subjects, with the questions rated by difficulty and winnings based on the odds of the question.Contestants compete to answer questions on various subjects, with the questions rated by difficulty and winnings based on the odds of the question.Contestants compete to answer questions on various subjects, with the questions rated by difficulty and winnings based on the odds of the question.
IMDb RATING
7.9/10
16
YOUR RATING
Browse episodes
Photos
Storyline
Three contestants, including a returing champion, competed in this general knowledge game patterned somewhat after the enormously-popular "Jeopardy!" Each contestant is given an initial bankroll of $125. Host James announces a category, each with three as-of-yet unrevealed questions--a "who," a "what" and a "where" question. Each question also had odds posted, based on the question's difficulty (most having even or 2:1 odds, with others had up to 5:1 odds). Each contestant secretly selects one question and wagers up to $50 on their ability to answer. All three wagers are revealed; if just one player chooses a specific question, he gets to answer it, with the contestant winning his/her bid multiplied by the odds if correct or losing his wager if he/she is wrong. However, if two or perhaps all three contestants choose the same question, only the highest bid is accepted; however, if two or all three bids on the same question are identical, the $50 limit is waived and the contestants can bid up to their entire bankroll. Only the winner of the auction gets to answer the question, with the wager added and multiplied or subtracted appropriately. The format is repeated through several rounds, with contestants able to bid up to $100 after an unspecified point in the game. For the final question, all contestants with positive scores could wager up to their entire bankroll on one final category, again with three question choices. The rules for answering were identical to previous rounds. All contestants kept what they had won, and the player with the highest cash winnings was champion and returned to the next show. Champions continued until winning five games or until defeated. —Brian Rathjen <briguy_52732@yahoo.com>
- Genre
- Parents guide
Did you know
- TriviaMost episodes of this series are presumed lost.
Top review
Even more challenging than Jeopardy!
This review may contain spoilers.
I agree that "the 3Ws" was a perfect companion to "Jeopardy!" Contestants started with $125 and could wager up to $50 on a "who," "what," or "where" question in a stated category; questions were assigned odds of even money to 5-1 based on their difficulty. The person who bid the most on a "W" question got the right to answer it and either added the amount of their wager multiplied by the odds, or lost just the amount of the wager. In the final round, "Pot Limit," the wagering limit was waived, as it was when--in the regular game--two players bet the same amount on the same category and the question would then be auctioned off.
I actually liked the "3Ws" better than "Jeopardy!" I thought the questions much more challenging; I remember once, playing the home game, I answered a 5-1 question on the origins of the tune of "The Star Spangled Banner" (it's an English drinking song, "To Anacreon In Heaven"). While I also liked "Challengers," the semi-revival, I'd like to see the "3Ws" in its original format--like "Jeopardy!"--and with the stakes increased (start the contestants with $1250 betting money and let them wager up to $500, perhaps) to reflect inflation. There is a problem: "Jeopardy!" and "Wheel Of Fortune" air back-to-back in so many markets it might be difficult, except in the Central and Mountain time zones, to get "Jeopardy!" and "3Ws" together again. But that doesn't make me keep from wishing it would happen.
I agree that "the 3Ws" was a perfect companion to "Jeopardy!" Contestants started with $125 and could wager up to $50 on a "who," "what," or "where" question in a stated category; questions were assigned odds of even money to 5-1 based on their difficulty. The person who bid the most on a "W" question got the right to answer it and either added the amount of their wager multiplied by the odds, or lost just the amount of the wager. In the final round, "Pot Limit," the wagering limit was waived, as it was when--in the regular game--two players bet the same amount on the same category and the question would then be auctioned off.
I actually liked the "3Ws" better than "Jeopardy!" I thought the questions much more challenging; I remember once, playing the home game, I answered a 5-1 question on the origins of the tune of "The Star Spangled Banner" (it's an English drinking song, "To Anacreon In Heaven"). While I also liked "Challengers," the semi-revival, I'd like to see the "3Ws" in its original format--like "Jeopardy!"--and with the stakes increased (start the contestants with $1250 betting money and let them wager up to $500, perhaps) to reflect inflation. There is a problem: "Jeopardy!" and "Wheel Of Fortune" air back-to-back in so many markets it might be difficult, except in the Central and Mountain time zones, to get "Jeopardy!" and "3Ws" together again. But that doesn't make me keep from wishing it would happen.
helpful•10
- bpatrick-8
- Jul 23, 2010
Details
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content
Recently viewed
Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.



