(I) (2002)

Critic Reviews

56

Metascore

Based on 30 critic reviews provided by Metacritic.com
70
Dallas Observer
Pits good taste against rousing intellectual provocation, and, happily, allows both to win.
70
New York Magazine (Vulture)
Noah Taylor does startlingly well by this role, but the conceit behind the film is a bizarre piece of wish-fulfillment.
60
Variety
The film is ultimately too glib in its suggestion that Hitler's discovering his career path was a matter of sheerest chance, even an accident.
50
Slate
As a ravishingly photographed, high-minded meditation on the potential of art and therapy to exorcise the vilest sort of psychological poison, it is positively riotous -- an Everest of idiocy.
50
What does make the film disturbing is the way in which it positions Hitler as a mere mouthpiece for what was already in the air, a role he was convinced to play after suffering one disappointment too many at the hands of Jews like Rothman.
50
The Globe and Mail (Toronto)
The whole film occupies pretty much the same continuuum -- glimmers of intelligence followed by moments of outright hysteria punctuated by bouts of sheer haplessness.
40
L.A. Weekly
Suggests that had young Adolf Hitler managed to get his art show, the Holocaust might never have happened. This seems absurd, not to say insensitive.
38
A serious and thoughtful movie that probably does not mean to trivialize the Holocaust and blame the victim. But it is playing with fire nevertheless.
30
The A.V. Club
Quirky, unsatisfying portrait.
30
Just because people are objecting to Max for all the wrong reasons doesn't make it a good film, and it's not. It's a bizarre curiosity memorable mainly for the way it fritters away its potentially interesting subject matter via a banal script, unimpressive acting and indifferent direction.

More Critic Reviews

See all external reviews for Max (2002) »

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Reviews | User Ratings | External Reviews


Recently Viewed