Ben Affleck took to wearing a wetsuit under his costumes in the film's final scene, because he got so cold standing under the fire sprinklers for hours on end. See more »
When Gavin Lights the paper on fire and raises it to the sprinkler head, that type of sprinkler head would only discharge the water. No other heads would spray water. The reason for this is to minimize damage. See more »
Thanks to the staff and Militia Force members and veterans at the Marcy Avenue Armory, Brooklyn, New York. See more »
There was an early review of the movie that contained a spoiler of the ending. The ending that was originally used involved and getting into a fist fight that leads onto the balcony. They talk about right and wrong and Affleck takes the file and tears it up and the movie fades to credits. This ending was most likely cut because test audiences did not like it. It will most likely appear on the DVD. Also a small clip shown in the TV ads shows Affleck and Jackson fighting on the balcony. This was part of the original ending which explains why it was cut. See more »
Not a great movie, but you get something out of it, definitely.
Basically, I share the opinion of a local newspaper in my town: for a Hollywood movie to tell a story about two very real people, two all the more everyday-people as their lives and consciences are neither pure nor desperately soiled, AND getting through it quite decntly - well, that's something.
I also will agree on a couple of things said by mattymatt4ever (now that's a long screen-name to type): Jackson is just a-ma-zing, maybe I've never seen him that good, because it's so far from his accustomed turf. I can't stand Ben Affleck, but he deserves a little credit here, though I can't help thinking he just lacks presence. Maybe it serves his character, ok. Haven't checked from where I know her, but definitely Amanda Peet does make a moment out that dinner. Which, now I think about it, is one of the few better filmed sequences.
Yeah, I can hear screams... but I thought the photography was terrible. Boring or distracting (those hand-held cameras made me sea-sick, although I can understand they where intended to induce life, nervousness, stress. Just doesn't work, for me). And the the film just barely makes it across, because there's not a lot of inspiration in the direction either. I rarely think that - and sometimes it can serve the plot - but that's tv-movie in Panavision.
God, I was so glad to see William Hurt who is such a marvelleous actor. Please, you people who can, give him some part worth of him!!!
So bottom line: go see it, there ARE ideas in there to make you think.
And take a moment to read the review by mattymatt4ever which inspired mine and who'll get a copy.
3 of 3 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?
| Report this