The James Bond film "Goldeneye" was better than "Tomorrow Never Dies" so I guess it makes sense that the game is too. This game does not resemble the highly successful game for the Nintendo 64 in the least. Which makes no sense, why would you do something so different for the next game? I guess it is a bit like the second Zelda game, the programmers did not want to appear lazy and thought that by adding an on screen James Bond the game would have more of a feel for the movie perhaps? I do not know, I am only taking a stab in the dark. The game play here is one where you see the game from behind Bond, he is fully visible. It is also an annoying game that just is not all that much fun. I will be the first to say I thought Goldeneye was overrated a bit, but I still enjoyed it, this one has a couple of fun levels, but to often it is an irritating mess. Why have Bond on the screen if all he is going to do is battle continuously, as both this game and the previous game ignore the fact Bond is more than just a super killer. Though I believe it is ignored more here than there. Sure you can ski and drive, but it really is just a short game where the combat kind of sucks. They always make being stealthy so hard and you end up in an all out shoot out for your life!