The Deep End (2001) Poster

(2001)

User Reviews

Review this title
180 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Victims of love
visualmetaphor31 August 2001
Taking care of others often involves self-sacrifice, and mothers of most feather will put themselves in harm's way to shield their young. In the THE DEEP END, a modern retelling of Max Ophuls' 1946 thriller THE RECKLESS MOMENT, Margaret Hall is a mother of three willing to do whatever it takes to keep her family safe from the irrational forces that follow her teenage son home one night from a nightclub of ill repute. But mom, played with stoic intensity by Tilda Swinton, quickly learns that heroism doesn't fit on a calendar already packed with soccer practices, trumpet lessons and visits to the grocery store.

Superficially the story concerns a vicious run of bad luck. Noirish events are set in motion when Margaret tries to cover up the accidental death of her son's unsavory friend (Josh Lucas as a spookily playful predator). The next day a man with a dice tattoo on his neck knocks on her door and demands $50,000 to suppress a videotape linking her son to the death, which police have ruled a homicide. The dramatic heart of the film concerns Margaret's dealings with the blackmailer, cagily played by Goran Visnjic, ER's Slavic heartthrob in a less soapy but perversely related role. Mr. Visnjic is credible though never quite menacing as a predator in awe of, and ultimately vulnerable to, his tender prey.

Taken at this level THE DEEP END, luminously shot in the gambling resort of Lake Tahoe, is an eerie joy ride that leans heavily on coincidence to tangle then unknot its plot. But the presence of Tilda Swinton indicates that more is going on here than melodrama. Ms. Swinton is a brilliant post-feminist actress whose work sheds light on paradoxes of femininity and female power. Her earlier films include ORLANDO, in which she explored androgyny and immortality, and FEMALE PERVERSIONS, a Freudian critique of the feminist myth of "having it all." In THE DEEP END, Ms. Swinton's nuanced performance comments on motherhood as a source of both power and vulnerability. A woman may be willing to do anything for her son, as Margaret Hall clearly is, yet still be constrained by a "glass ceiling" of caregiving attachments that prevent her from achieving man-style success. In cinema, the latter typically means blowing the villains' brains out, something Margaret Hall might consider doing if she weren't so busy taking care of her kids and aging father-in-law.

Throughout the film Margaret tries but is unable to reach her husband, a Navy officer on an aircraft carrier somewhere in the mid-Atlantic. His unavailability is more than an inconvenience. Attempting to negotiate with the blackmailers, Margaret finds herself hamstrung when the bank refuses a critical withdrawal without her husband's say-so. Mr. Hall's conspicuous absence and his infirm father's burdensome presence amplify Margaret's predicament, showing how hollow the conventions of marriage and machismo can be. The fact that both men are soldiers, society's designated heroes, is no accident. They defend motherhood in the abstract while remaining blind to a real mother's needs.

Margaret Hall is Ms. Swinton's most reluctant feminist character to date, a woman whose maternal ferocity the family setting renders moot and who must ultimately rely on the kindness of strangers. Her performance transforms THE DEEP END from a good summer thriller to a dramatic critique of the politics of caregiving.
42 out of 52 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Give this film another chance . . .
standingsixfeet19 May 2002
I saw this film last summer in the theaters and while it didn't do much for me at the time, something in it stayed with me. I rented it again and watched it twice more and am now convinced it is a terrific film.

A lot has been said about Swinton's portrayal of a frustrated housewife and she is brilliant, she carries the film with a head-on intensity.

But the screenplay should also be lauded. Yes, this is straight out of 1940's noir, but it all works.

A lot has been said about the sex and sexuality switch of Swinton's son, but it works perfectly. One might ask . . . why doesn't she ask her son about the body before she dumps it? But that would involve TALKING to her son about his sexuality. She'd rather bury the evidence, than ever admit to herself that her son is gay.

Over the course of the film, Swinton begins to understand her son better, she realizes that everyone has their secrets and desires. Her son also realizes the worry he has put his mother through. The last shot, of mother and son huddled together on the bed is of two strong-willed people finally understanding each other as equals. It's a wonderfully telling moment.

Be sure to watch this film more than once . . . it can be taken on many levels.

james
54 out of 69 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Effective Character Study
jhclues9 May 2002
The myriad effects of the natural instincts of a mother are at the heart of this film, which explores the positive aspects, as well as the inherent flaws of those same instincts. The ways in which an ordinary person will react under extraordinary circumstances often produces results that are most inexplicable; and when it's a mother responding to a situation in which her son is involved, the results may, in fact, be absolutely incomprehensible. And in such cases, decisions made quickly in the shadows of the subjective are often revealed as unconscionable in the cold light of objectivity, a scenario examined by writers/directors Scott McGehee and David Siegel, in their tension laced drama, `The Deep End,' starring Tilda Swinton.

Margaret Hall (Swinton) lives with her family in a picturesque lakeside home in Tahoe City, Nevada; but her life is about to become less than that offered by her distinctive surroundings. Her husband is away at sea on an extended tour of duty, and the care and responsibility of raising their three children has fallen to her. And all is not well. Her seventeen-year-old son, Beau (Jonathan Tucker), an aspiring musician who hopes to garner a scholarship to study music at college, has become involved with a man, Darby Reese (Josh Lucas) who owns a bar, The Deep End; and once she is aware of it, it's a situation of no little concern for a mother.

For her son's welfare, Margaret knows that this relationship-- whatever the context-- must end, and she goes to Reese, insisting that he leave her son alone. There is some question as to whether or not he agrees, but regardless, late that night he shows up at Margaret's home, where he entices Beau to come outside with him. Things go badly, and by the next morning, Margaret is embroiled in a situation beyond her wildest nightmares. Blinded by fear and concern for Beau, she does something out of character for any rational person, yet within the parameters established by the unconditional love of a mother for her son. It's an act that brings more bad news to her doorstep, in the form of a man named Alek Spera (Goran Visnjic). And it's the beginning of a series of events that will take her into places darker than any she has ever known.

McGehee and Siegel adapted their screenplay from the novel `The Blank Wall,' by Elisabeth Sanxay Holding, and it's a taut thriller, to be sure; but it is so singular of purpose that it decidedly becomes more of a character study that focuses on Margaret, and the effects of that natural bond between mother and son that provides the catalyst for her motivation and the impetus of her actions. It's a story that clearly illustrates how even the most discerning individual (and most especially a mother) will abandon reason in the heat of the moment, giving way to the most primitive and basic instincts for survival that are inherently a part of the human condition. And though MeGehee and Siegel maintain the tension of the situation throughout the film, it does wear a bit thin along the way, and at least one pivotal element of the plot is questionable, and strains the credibility of the overall story. The real interest of the film, however, is the study of what the mother/son relationship is really all about, and how affecting it can be, especially under extreme circumstances.

What really makes the film work, though, and what maintains interest, is the performance by Tilda Swinton as Margaret. And it's quite a feat, given the fact that the emotional boundaries she is given to explore are somewhat limited, as the conflict begins even as the film begins, and Margaret is driven on and presented in an emotional state that gives her very little latitude in which to operate. To her credit, however, Swinton finds all of the variables one could expect in what is basically a lone emotion, which encompasses concern and apprehension, and she conveys them admirably; it is, in fact, what keeps the film afloat. Her portrayal of Margaret is subtle, concise and introspective, and most importantly, comes across quite naturally; all of which makes her character and her actions-- which on the surface and in the cold light of day may seem questionable-- convincing.

As Alek, Goran Visnjic gives a solid performance, though it somewhat lacks the kind of emotional depth that could have made this character more than what it is. Whether it is the way the character was written, or the way it was acted, there is an ambivalence to Alek that makes him less than believable. He looks good on the surface, and Visnjic does have some nice touches, but he doesn't tap into the absolute credibility that he needs. And it makes one aspect of the film seem a little too pat, as if the character is there merely as a means to an end, to help the story along and tidy up the resolution. It's a minor weakness, not worthy of blame; suffice to say that something apparently was missed in the translation of the material from page to screen. In retrospect, Visnjic does a good job with what he is given to work with.

In a smaller, but pivotal role, Josh Lucas gives a good performance as Reese, creating a character that is repugnantly smarmy, a guy whose influence over one's son would be any mother's nightmare. Lucas does exceptionally well in this regard, and with comparatively little screen time; he uses his time well, however, as it is the nature of his character more than anything else that gives credence to Margaret's actions.

The supporting cast includes Peter Donat (Jack), Raymond J. Barry (Carlie), Tamara Hope (Paige) and Jordan Dorrance (Dylan). As a thriller, this one has merit; but viewed as a character study/drama, `The Deep End' is even more engrossing. It's flawed, but it's still smart, thought provoking entertainment-- the magic of the movies. 7/10.
28 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Dad Can't Find Out!
efitness19 March 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Once I had finished watching "The Deep End" I had to look at the Netflix packaging to find out what year it was made because I couldn't believe that in the year 2001 an entire suspense melodrama could be mounted on the lone homophobic premise, "Dad Can't Find Out!"

This tale of a Mad-Mom (as in insane) who goes to great lengths to prevent the world from finding out that *gasp* her 17 year-old son is gay (she can't even say the word!) is like a perverse remake of the 1950's Loretta Young feature "Cause for Alarm!" in which an average housewife does numerous stupid things trying to conceal a death she had nothing to do with.

Here the wonderful Tilda Swinton (a good deal less wonderful here) plays a mom whose protectiveness of her near-adult son borders on the psychotic. Indeed, as the film progressed and she acted wackier and wackier, I was sure that it would come out that she is unwholesomely possessive of her son. Sonny boy (sullen and closed-mouthed) is carrying on with a much older man and mom interferes in a way that even a 13 year old would find mortifying, much less a 17 year old. She operates under the assumption that her gay son has been seduced and lured into contact with this man, but from what we see, he is just a young man who has fallen in with a bad crowd and is drawn to an older guy. A creepy guy albeit, but when we later find out how absent the father is and would not understand his son's gayness no matter what, then subtext kicks in and you start to imagine that Sonny boy is drawn to bad boys and inappropriate partners for a reason.

Mom, however is hearing none of this. Even when said son wrecks a car drunk driving with his lover, the mom convinces herself that it is the sole fault of the 30 year-old man, not her son who was actually behind the wheel. Her son seems troubled and she seems like a reactionary nut, but is this what the film focuses on? No. The film has the creepy older gay guy accidentally die on their property and mom spends the entire film covering it up because she thinks in some way her son is involved. Since this family is severely screwed up (to me, that is, the filmmakers seem to think this affluent family of non-communicative, isolated individuals is worth protecting from scary gamblin', screwin' and blackmailin' homosexuals) she never actually asks the son what happened, calls the police, or even wonders how she could think her son capable of murder. The son mourns his ex lover for about ten minutes and never loses much sleep over the possibility that he may have been the last one to see him alive. No, everything is a whirlwind of dance classes, music lessons, baseball games and laundry for this bunch. Who has time to talk?

After a series of plot contrivances too ridiculous to recount (among them an empathetic blackmailer who doesn't have the heart for the job...oh yeah, there are lots of those around), an alarming amount of people pay with their lives for the sole purpose of keeping Sonny boy's big, dark secret from daddy and maintaining the privileged class status quo. Oh, brother!

Much of the stupidity that preceded it would have been forgivable if at the end there was perhaps an awareness on the mother's part that the distasteful acts she engaged in were not equal to what she thought she was protecting: the problem was not that her son was gay, nor that he rebelliously got mixed up with a guy almost twice his age, the problem was that her son's father would not understand and that she raised her son in an environment where who he was was not as important as what he appeared to be to others. She was less concerned with his lying, underage drinking and hanging out with guys with possible mob ties than she was with his being gay and "outed." What are the biggest moral transgressions here?

"The Deep End" is so woefully shallow and is content to sacrifice psychological depth for artificially earned suspense.

I can't remember when I've been so put off by the unintended offensiveness of a film's premise. Loathed it.
22 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Very Suspenseful And Original
alexduffy20009 August 2002
THE DEEP END is an original and suspenseful thriller, pitting a mother, played by Tilda Swinton, against a blackmailer, played by Goran Visnjic. It's the relationship between the two that drives this movie, as Visnjic's character begins to change because of the decency and honesty he encounters in Swinton's character. I gave this 8 out of 10 instead of 9 out of 10 because the ending is somewhat predictable, it's like something from a 1930's big Hollywood studio film. Nevertheless, a compelling script and convincing performances from all the actors make this worth seeing.

8/10
35 out of 51 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Avoid.
mjurado5 May 2002
Warning: Spoilers
Contains Spoilers!!! The short version: Poorly written, poorly performed.

I would like to say this movie is horrible. But it's not the kind of horrible where you get up thinking "well, they tried really hard to write a good script, just too ambitious." It's the kind of horrible where you think "man, they really weren't trying."

Tilda Swinton is poorly cast and not convincing at all as the mother. The film seems to need to overstate things to the audience, such as when Swinton disposes of the body in broad daylight, the screenplay felt the need to show a helicopter-shot panoramic view of the area, to quell the "yeah, right, like she could do that in broad daylight" feelings you're having. The film also insults your intelligence in other ways, such as dressing Swinton in black and handing her a cigarette in the scene where you find out her sinister intentions. The story is decent, but it seems like the cinematic devices used in the screenplay are straight out of the 1930's.

The characters in the film behave in excessively stupid ways. For example, why did she wait until the morning to dispose of the body? Why did she not question her son about the incident before disturbing the crime scene? Police are a non-factor, in fact no authority speaks to a member of the cast until 3/4 of the way through, when the sheriff's officer asks Swinton about the anchor. She says their boat doesn't have an anchor, and he simply accepts it and the police never enter the plot again; apparently not having looked around the houses at the lake at all to discover the broken board, as well as the blood the body would have certainly left in the boat.

Earlier in the film, after Swinton drives the dead man's Corvette to another location, (how did the keyless entry still work after the car keys had been submerged for some length of time?), she wipes the steering wheel 'clean' of her prints - neglecting other obvious places like the door handle, the shifter, the radio buttons which she adjusts, and other things she would have certainly touched on the interior of the vehicle.

These are just a few examples; there aren't really any gaping holes in the plot, just a small number of examples where the characters behaved in excessively careless or irrational ways, but frequently enough to interrupt your acceptance of the rest of the plot. The story itself is not awful, the acting is serviceable but not at all above average, but the script sank this one from the beginning.
21 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Did I Miss Something? Terrible....Rushed Movie
chrissyt198613 April 2012
Warning: Spoilers
I had really high expectations before watching this movie, the reviews I read on both here and the cover of the DVD really had me excited. I love nothing more than a solid crime thriller but I was left really disappointed after watching this.

The film seemed to rush everything to the point were I thought I'd missed something. The acting was terrible, it was like watching a bad TV movie. Tilda Swinton is wasted in this movie and seems to be just plodding along. The relationship with Margret and Alek is sooo bizarre one minute he's blackmailing her and 30mins later they are the best of friends. She falls for him without there being any reason for it happen. There's very little in the way of a police investigation over the death of Darby which seems very unrealistic. I still have no idea how Alek and his partner managed to get the video in order to blackmail Margret that all seemed very rushed as well.

Very disappointing! it could have been soooo much better
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A melodrama that worked for me
bandw29 April 2006
It appears that either this movie works for you or doesn't. It worked for me for several reasons, not the least being the great performance by Tilda Swinton as Margaret, an upper-middle-class mother with an obsessive desire to protect her son. Swinton projects the image of a woman who can handle any situation; blackmail, the revelation of her son's sexual orientation, the notion that her son may be a murderer, taking care of her aging father-in-law, and running the family are all in a day's work. I was drawn into the story by the beautiful photography, the captivating music, and the plot twists. For whatever reason I did not dwell on plot holes but simply allowed myself to be absorbed. And, if you accept Margaret's almost pathologically obsessive devotion to her family, then most of what happens hangs together.

I found the unexpected relationship that develops between Margaret and the blackmailer to be interesting. The experience is more transformative for him than for her. I also like the way the tables were turned on the relationship between Margaret and her spoiled son. In the beginning his behavior was confusing to Margaret and he was not willing to talk about it and in the end Margaret's behavior was mysterious to her son and she was not willing to talk about it.

It was only the contrived ending that bothered me.
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Don't bury bodies in shallow water
clausq5 September 2001
Warning: Spoilers
SPOILERS

Spoilers sure, but what's to spoil? The critics, no doubt parched for anything resembling a movie of substance these days, have collectively gone off the deep end, hook line and sinker, for this piece of unmitigated garbage. This is surely among the worst "serious" movies ever made, marred at every turn by inexplicable emotional reactions, ludicrous plot turns, bad acting, and bafflingly amateurish ineptitude. The plot can be summarized as follows, tongue only slightly in cheek: Kid has preposterous sexual relationship with a disgusting slimy smarmy creep, creep gets in fist fight with kid, during fight creep manages to hurl himself lung first upon an anchor in Lake Tahoe without kid knowing it, super soccer Mom discovers body the next day and calmly totes it in her little power boat out into the middle of Lake Tahoe in order to bury it in 2 feet deep water (soccer Mom has a screw loose), Mom comes back an hour later to do a striptease and dive to get keys out of corpse's pocket, handsome stranger comes to blackmail Mom, Mom irons sheets drops kids off at tennis and runs around trying to raise $50,000 to pay blackmail, Mom never has more than a 2 second conversation with son, son is an uncommunicative jerk who seemingly has no relationship at all with Mom, Mom hocks jewelry, irritating sit-com father-in-law has a heart attack, handsome stranger performs CPR, handsome stranger looks at family picture while Mom is at hospital and falls in love with her, Mom joins traveling Mariachi band and travels naked throughout Portugal to raise cash, handsome stranger gets in fight with partner in crime and kills him, then dies in car crash in his get-away car, Mom frantically discovers this and smears her love all over his bloody forehead, kid watches the whole thing bemused, and they all live happily ever after. Sounds like a classic, eh? This compelling and organic plot line had a significant portion of the audience in giggling fits throughout. Some of the dialog is so lame, you can't wait for more of the characters to find some absurd way to off themselves, perhaps wishing you could do the same to whoever talked you into seeing this disgusting and degrading trash.
17 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Very effective performances and a strong first act eventually lose their power. *** (out of four)
Movie-121 October 2001
THE DEEP END / (2001) *** (out of four)

By Blake French:

Lake Tahoe, the tenth deepest lake in the world, is a long, cold body of clear, turquoise water thriving at 6,000 feet in the Sierra Nevada Mountain Range. Isolated by snow-covered mountain tops, ponderosa pines, and upper class wood homes, this is the perfect backdrop for The Deep End.

The Deep End captures some of this harrowing atmosphere, but I wanted even more. The photography, by Giles Nuttgens, won the coveted Best Cinematography Award at the Sundance Film Festival this year for its unflinching look at images of Lake Tahoe awash in moral tensions. The camera cuts through aquariums, dripping water faucets, bursting water bottles, and of course, across and beneath the lake's surface. On a photographic level, this is one great movie.

Writers/directors Scott McGehee and David Siegel found their inspiration for The Deep End from the little known 1940's novel The Blank Wall by Elisabeth Sanxay Holding. The Ladies Home Journal first published an abridged version of the story. It became so popular that the writer eventually made it into a novel. According to the film's press notes, even Alfred Hitchcook was impressed as evident when he chose the book for his classic anthology My Favorites in Suspense-1959. Holding's novel was the only full length feature book of fiction included on that list.

McGehee and Siegel previously worked on the independent film Suture. "In their day, stories like these were very subversive because they asked questions about the nature of families, about the limits of communication, and the loneliness of personal sacrifice," says Siegel of Holding's story. "We wanted to bring those same elements in a contemporary setting with characters that would be sympathetic and believable to people today."

Holding certainly did have an innate understanding that true suspense emerges not just from violence and mystery, but also from the fabric of everyday life. The Deep End examines a housewife named Margaret (Tilda Swinton) who protects her gay teenage son (Jonathan Tucker) by covering up the death of his lover (Josh Lucas). Did her son kill this person? Someone might know the truth behind this act of violence, but silence has a very high price tag.

A very involving introduction and first act suffer after the diabolical murder plot takes a downhill spiral into a different set of events. Alek Spera (Gordan Visnijc), who needs money for his boss (Raymond J. Berry), creates a blackmail scheme. The film goes downhill from here, but the overall product is far from boring.

That's largely because of the beautiful performances. Tilda Swinton, seen opposite Leonardo DiCaprio in 1999's The Beach, leads the cast with a powerhouse performance. Swinton paints a vivid, intriguing portrait of domestic serenity, peaceful ordinariness, and motherhood's merciful nature. She can move the audience with utter silence; her eyes exclude intelligence, instinct, and compassion. She completes what the movie leaves unfinished, including her character's adherence to routine and complete loss of moral compass.

Gordon Visnjic (Dr. Luka Kovac on "ER.") with his dark, brooding physique, creates a shadowy nature for his character. His motives remain a mystery; we never know why he does what he does. It lets the audience guess-but we do not have much to guess with. The film does not complete his character. He's one of the most interesting characters here, but Visnjic needs more to chew on.

The filmmakers comment about the hidden romantic feelings between Margaret and Alek. "It's the kind of romance I miss in movies. It's not explicit and it is not necessarily even realized, but it is there in a haunting, melancholic way," says Visnjic. Where? We never really grasp these potentially fascinating plot points because the movie never examines these emotions. This is the kind of material that would have taken The Deep End to another level of interest.
15 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
"I don't have time for you blackmailing me, I have to do dishes and take my son to basketball practice"
GoD-s-LoNeLy-MaN19 October 2006
Warning: Spoilers
"The Deep End" is a psychological thriller about a kid, Beau, who apparently killed his boyfriend (Reese) and about his caring mother Margaret covering up the deed. Margaret, who lives with his son and her other kids in a house on Tahoe lake, wanted Reese to stay away from his son. After Margaret heard the boys fight earlier on, she finds the dead body and without ever talking to Beau about it, she disposes the body in broad daylight using her boat's anchor to weigh the body down in the water. She wants to protect her son. Many reviewers complained about the fact that she should have at least spoke to Beau about it but I find this not unrealistic and like this use of unconditional love. The movie takes a promising start.

Back to the plot: A few days later a guy (Alek) shows up at their house and blackmails Margaret. He wants her to pay $50.000 and threatens to hand a videotape to the police who have found Reese's body in the meantime. The tape shows Beau and Reese having sex. Maragret tries to somehow get the $50.000.

Now comes the part of the movie that I found really annoying and stupid. She cannot tell her children anything about the blackmail so she has to keep doing her maternal duties while she desperately tries to get the money. Margaret explains to Alex why she does not have the money yet and their dialog is really laughable:

Margaret Hall: We don't have the money. Alek 'Al' Spera: You have to get the money. Is that not clear enough? MH: It's $50,000. It is not the kind of thing that everyone can just go out and get. Alek: Have you spoken with your husband? M: He can't be reached. He's on a carrier somewhere in the nor - This is truly none of your business. Alek: What about the old man? Well, you have to try harder. M: "Try harder?" Alek: I don't think you're really trying. M: Really? Alek: Yes. Margaret Hall: Well, maybe you should explain "really trying" to me, Mr. Spera. Tell me - how would you be "really trying" if you were me? But you're not me, are you? You don't have my petty concerns to clutter your life and keep you from trying. You don't have three kids to feed, or worry about the future of a 17-year-old boy who nearly got himself killed driving back from some kind of a nightclub with his 30-year-old friend sitting drunk in the seat beside him. No, these are not your concerns. I see that. But perhaps you're right, Mr. Spera. Perhaps I could be trying a little harder. Maybe sometime tomorrow between dropping Dylan at baseball practice and picking up my father-in-law from the hospital, I might find a way to try a little harder. Maybe I should take a page from your book: go to the track, find a card game. Maybe I should blackmail someone. Or maybe you have another idea. I mean, maybe you have a better idea of how I might try a little harder to find this $50,000 you've come here to steal from me. Alek: You're right. I'm not you. I don't - This is only a business opportunity. That's all.

Just the typical conversation between blackmailer and the person whom he blackmails. Happens all the time. But Alek turns out to actually be a really nice guy and the two fall in love. Alek does not want his part of the money anymore and tries to convince his boss to give Margaret more time to get the boss' $25.000. This turn is laughably ridiculous.

Him falling for her is really unrealistic. There really is not a lot of tension and the police is underused. They never show up at her house again after they briefly asked if she knew anything about an anchor. She says their boat has no anchor; the cops leave.

In the end, Alek sacrifices himself by driving off a cliff as he is driving with his boss. Magaret who was following the two takes the videotape out of the wrecked car and as she is reaching for it her lips touch Alek's lips. Alek and his boss die.

It turns out that Beau did not know anything about Reese's death which turned out to have been an accident. Beau and Reese had an argument outside Beau's house. Beau told Reese to leave and went back inside before drunken Reese fell into an anchor and died.

Seems like a missed opportunity as the story really has some potential.

** 5.0/10 **
9 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
A remarkably bad film
bikerpaul6822 January 2005
Warning: Spoilers
If you can get through the first twenty minutes you can probably get through the rest.

Margaret goes to a gay bar in Reno and tells 30 year old Darby to stop seeing her 17 year old son Beau, goes back home to Lake Tahoe, tells Beau to stop seeing Darby, hears noises outside, finds Darby dead on the lake shore, heaves him into her boat, covers him with a tarpaulin, rows him to a distant but fortunately shallow part of the lake, tips him in, rows back, hides the tarp in the trash can, notices his car, rows back to the body, strips to her vest and knickers (not a pretty sight), dives into the icy water, retrieves his car keys with one swift and skillful movement, rows back, drives the car to a hotel car park, dumps it, and jogs back home to get the children off to school. What a woman! So of course, when Al turns up the next day and wants $50,000 for a tape of Beau being rogered by Darby, she doesn't bat an eyelid, she spends all day trying to raise a loan and, when that doesn't work, ropes Al in to do CPR on her father in law, who by a curious coincidence has just gone into cardiac arrest in the living room.

Why doesn't she call the police, who are investigating the disappearance and murder of Darby? Well, from what we see of the local police, they wouldn't notice if Lake Tahoe disappeared.

This is a truly remarkable film in the way it combines a ridiculous plot, appalling dialogue, atrocious acting and a director's style totally lacking in tension or excitement. The scene where Margaret asks Al how he expects her to find the $50,000 while cooking, cleaning and getting the kids to school is a masterpiece of unintentional hilarity. Everyone involved in making this rubbish should be banned from film-making for at least ten years, and preferably for life.
13 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Too much control!
oldprof20 October 2001
Who came up with the summary, "spirals out of control"? Margaret, is, if anything, too much in control! One waits throughout the movie for her control to break. Who put her in charge of her son's destiny? Why is she willing, even at the moment she "speaks the truth" in all but this one respect, to specify HERSELF as the one responsible for her son's lover's death? She'll do anything to help him go on to college as a music major, but she won't be able to shield him always from the consequences of his own bad judgment. And perhaps her horrified expression as she watches the video reflects this realization as much as it does her visceral horror at the activity taking place. He is the one who is "spiraling out of control"--HER control. She is trying, presumably at her husband's behest before he shipped out, to make & keep the world safe for her family. But their domestic tranquility is built on a foundation of corruption--that of nearby Reno & its gambling enterprises & related criminal activities. Perhaps at the end when she breaks down & weeps, she is finally letting go of her "sense of control," along with her innocence, which has been compromised much more deeply than that of her son.
10 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
simply ridiculous
jtho102527 December 2009
this film is ridiculous ~ and the main character (tilda swinton as margaret hall) is even more so. she is the most ridiculous and whiny woman i've seen in a film in a long time. she spends most of her time in the film begging someone for something ~ "pleeease, (fill in the blank)." she begs her father-in-law, both of her sons (several times), her daughters, alec (the goran visnjic character) ... EVERYONE! if i knew this woman personally i would probably slap her, rather like cher slaps nicholas cage in "moonstruck" ~ "snap out of it!"

the only redeeming factor of this film was that it took up some time on a rainy Sunday afternoon.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Hitchcock light...to light
stensson18 November 2001
There is of course always a danger in being inspired by Alfred the Master and that is if you lack talent. This is a film about Mother's devotion, but you aren't touched, you aren't puzzled and letting dying persons saying important things,like in this movie, have through all film history been a cheap trick. Tilda Swinton is OK, but not OK enough to get you interested in this family drama, where death and some violence only get you more bored
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
It's Deep All Right
Cheetah-66 September 2004
Rarely does one come along a pile of you know what as deep as this. Just how gullible does this writer think one audience can be? One of the most contrived, convoluted plots around. It's all pretty ridiculous and laughable and a classic film for making fun of as you watch. My friend and I were on a roll by the time we got to the last half hour and really enjoyed some good laughs. From a woman who makes some pretty stupid decisions in her obsession to protect her son to her totally oblivious family to developing a crush on the man who is trying to blackmail her for 50,000 dollars, yes, this is the deep end of suspending disbelief in film. Hey, maybe this is some kind of offbeat black comedy; if so, then it deserves the highest rating.
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Just Terrific!!!!!!
Brandy-2810 February 2003
I cannot believe the negative remarks about this movie. I thought this movie was excellent. The majority of complaints on this board, are more about the lighting, sound and technical crap that regular people who go to the movies just don't look for. You go to a movie to get lost for a couple of hours and enjoy yourself. If your going to the movies only for the technical side of the movie, then why go at all.

This movie showed the extent that a mother would go through to protect her son and her family. This lady totally went above and beyond everything to protect her son from the truth, which he never found out.

The only real problem I had with this movie was that the word "Gay" was never said. Not once. Unless my hearing left me when it was said. It was referenced and even a little sex was shown, but the word was never said.

Other than that, I enjoyed this movie completely. Just Terrific!!!!!!!!
25 out of 46 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Intriguing (spoilers)
JesNollie1 May 2002
Warning: Spoilers
This is one of the more realistic films I've seen recently. I don't know that a mother would actually go that far if she truly believed her son had killed someone, but then again, as a mother I have to wonder "how far would I go?". But the realism is enough to hold your attention, even without the surprises, action and twists we've become so accustomed to from most Hollywood movies. The acting in this movie is wonderful, and so much of it is done without words. I particularly liked the way it ended, with so many misconceptions and unanswered questions for the characters. It seemed much more real that the usual ending tying up all loose ends, because in reality life is full of loose ends.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Swinton rocks in a true twisted thriller!
im00sev15 April 2003
This film is like a great term paper: it flows like fire-water from a heated pitcher. I bought it on a caprice, only to rivet myself to the screen unexpectedly. Tilda Swinton is absolutely flawless (not to mention Visnjic) in a very strange tale about a mother's endless desire to protect. Not that I consider it a true flaw, but I would have liked for Margaret to tell Beau exactly why things had been so screwy and deadly for the past two days. The opportunity arises at the very end but she decides not. For me, I certainly would have explained to a seventeen-year-old boy that if he screws around with derelicts in seedy closets, people die. It's sort of an important part of growing up. However, directors McGehee and Siegel decide to omit that part. While the film is a must for thrill-seekers, I really felt that the boy should have been let in on the sticky, lethal web his juvenile lust did spin. BUT TILDA ROCKS! Just like this movie.
14 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Confused
livsez15 September 2001
A friend recommended this film to me stating it was the best film he'd seen this year. I am completely dumbfounded at the notion that he, other people at imdb, and several film critics have actually confused this quite possibly one of the worst written, acted, directed, edited, and overscored theme music to cover up the lack of any true emotion or suspense films ever made. I love indie films, but The Deep End is a harsh reminder as to how awful a film can be. Many of the reviews here have summed up why this film is such an abomination. I do have to give kudos to the cinematography, opening title sequence, and sound work, but the film was such a train wreck by the end with its horrendous script, acting and direction colliding, I found myself laughing harder than any comedy I've seen in recent memory.

P.s. - I can't wait for the DVD to hear how the film makers explain what a struggle it was to make such a bad film.
9 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
flat, unengaging, and tedious
bblack31 August 2001
This film was populated with uni-dimensional characters that I didn't care about one way or another.

The most emotional range shown by the protagonist was at the end when tears were shed. Big woo. Facial appearance, body posture, vocal inflection ... all were flat. Things went from bad to worse to tragic with no visible change in her demeanor.

This was an apparent attempt to be a quirky Coen Brothers style film; it was an abysmal failure. It was a fairly good story, but excruciatingly executed.
9 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Sentimental junk with homosexual content tossed in
blecht6667 December 2001
The Deep End is a rather dull, conventional melodrama with the added element of having homosexual characters subsituted for the straight characters of the film upon which it was based, The Reckless Moment. This substitution does not elevate it from the soap opera it is (albeit with beautiful scenery) to something "more." There is nothing original about this film, other than the cheap use of homosexuality. The scenes that were supposed to create tension fell completely flat. The motivations for the characters' actions made no sense, and the ending, which was intended to create a sympathetic reaction from the audience, was laughable. The only people who will enjoy this movie are those who can derive sufficient pleasure from seeing beautiful shots of Lake Tahoe, and lingering shots of Tilda Swinton and Goran Visnjic. The rest of us would be better entertained elsewhere. Most critics fell all over themselves to praise this movie. I believe the only reason they did so was the fear of being labled homophobic if they panned it. They need to look at movies with gay characters in them the same way they would look at movies with only heterosexual characters and make their judgments accordingly. Of course, different sexual orientations could bring different elements to the movie, but to rave about something simply because we're shown a gay relationship is ludicrous.
10 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Avoid at all costs
El Gris24 October 2001
Over the top symbolism, events that are completely predictable, or so far fetched that it's almost hilarious, ridiculous plot lines, compared to which STAR WARS seems a pretty credible story, and an end that just wouldn't come. A complete waste of time.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
I'll feel much better if I can save one other person from seeing this film.
giaconda23 September 2001
This is the only way I can make myself feel any better from having wasted what seemed like 4 hours in the movie theater, but which turned out to only be the standard 90 minutes. I was at no point interested in any of the characters in this movie nor their "struggles." The scenarios were absurd and the "progression" of the plot was boring and unrealistic, two qualities that no movie can possess at once and be at all entertaining. The nautical theme of the film was so heavy-handed as to be insulting. The characters and their motives were unbearably, and again, insultingly, flat. By the end (of only 90 minutes!) there were at least 2 or 3 honest snores from dozing audience members around me. Please, save yourselves.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
A truly awful movie
lordrobot5 September 2001
This movie is a joke. This says it all.

'The latest fraud coming along to remind us of just how truly awful

indie movies can be is The Deep End, a mercilessly incompetent thriller

that's easily as soulless (and brainless) as Tomb Raider or Planet of

the Apes or Jurassic Park III. The movie was written, produced, and

directed by David Siegel and Scott McGehee, whose previous effort was

the not-always-successful but remarkably fashionable indie thriller

Suture, and this film retains none of the interest in their earlier

work. Filmed in shimmering CinemaScope that does nothing but call

attention to itself, the film offers little but impotent stylistic

posturing; in the tradition of generic Hollywood thrillers, it draws

only the simplest characters and the most basic plot developments with

which to waste our time, somehow insisting that the handling of the

material is where the meat of the film lies. McGehee and Siegel can

admittedly compose an attractive image, but if that's all they're after,

why not try still photography and leave notions of story, character,

performance, and theme to those who have more than a 2nd grade

understanding of the medium? It would do us all a lot of good.' (M
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed