An imaginative wedding scene shot in silhouette, begins a tale of murder blackmail and romance covering a period of about 18 years, ending around 1923.An imaginative wedding scene shot in silhouette, begins a tale of murder blackmail and romance covering a period of about 18 years, ending around 1923.An imaginative wedding scene shot in silhouette, begins a tale of murder blackmail and romance covering a period of about 18 years, ending around 1923.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
Ivan Mozzhukhin
- Julien Villandrit
- (as Ivan Mosjoukine)
Vladimir Strizhevsky
- Pascal Rudeberg
- (as Wladimir Strijiewski)
Ernest Bourbon
- Un bagnard évadé
- (uncredited)
- …
Gilbert Dacheux
- Urbain - Le majordome
- (uncredited)
José Davert
- Le bagnard 275
- (uncredited)
Jules de Spoly
- Le banquier à Paris
- (uncredited)
Sylvia Grey
- Marjorie
- (uncredited)
Fabien Haziza
- Pascal enfant
- (uncredited)
Pierre Hot
- Le procureur
- (uncredited)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
10miyamoto
An art film shot as a serial. An imaginative wedding scene shot in silhouette, begins a tale of murder blackmail and romance covering a period of about 18 years, ending around 1923. The film had the MOMA audience breaking out into applause at the end of each chapter, starting from about chapter 3. At the June 28, 2003 showing at the Gramercy Theatre in New York, only 2 people left of the 150 people who came to see the film, and they came back to see the end of the film. A remarkable feat since the film ran over 7 hours. The film was projected at 22 frames per second. At a 16 frame per second speed the film takes over 9 hours to view.
Although not a standard cliffhanger type serial, the storyline is so intriguing that the audience came back early from the two intermissions.
Although not a standard cliffhanger type serial, the storyline is so intriguing that the audience came back early from the two intermissions.
Until not that long ago, I was totally unfamiliar with Ivan Mosjoukine and this despite the fact that I have been a fan of silent films for many years. I even feature courses on them at the local university but as more silent films are discovered in archives and with new restoration techniques available the list of unknown and/or previously unavailable films keeps growing. Last year I saw and reviewed Flicker Alley's FRENCH MASTERWORKS set which focused on the work of Russian emigres in Paris in the 1920s. This is where I became acquainted with Mosjoukine as he was prominently involved with 3 films in that set.
I have long been a fan of the silent serial especially those of French director Louis Feuillade. His FANTOMAS, JUDEX, and especially LES VAMPIRES set the template for others to follow. These and such German offerings as THE SPIDERS are concerned with master criminals, vast organizations devoted to crime and fearless crime fighters determined to bring them to an end. Pure escapism for a growing cinema audience trying to escape the horrors of World War I. HOUSE OF MYSTERY (1921-23) is different. It takes the structure of the serial and imposes a deeper, more dramatic, and more personal element into the storyline.
On the surface the story borrows heavily from THE COUNT OF MONTE CRISTO. Man is wrongfully accused of crime and unjustly convicted. He is sent to a penal colony where he escapes and is presumed dead. He returns in disguise to bring the true culprit to justice. Director Alexandre Volkoff and star and co-writer Ivan Mosjoukine take this basic plotline and add the serial tropes of multiple disguises, complicated plot developments and an extended chase sequence. The film is also divided into 10 chapters and runs 6 1/2 hours! Of course no one was meant to sit through all 10 chapters at once. It took me 4 days (3 chapters a day and the bonus features last).
Now that I've seen it all, I was very impressed. The cinematography (by 3 cameramen) is stunning. The silhouette wedding recalls the work of Maurice Tourneur. The performances for most of the time are restrained and heartfelt, and the storyline based on a book rather than a magazine or newspaper publication has a lot more depth. The locations are memorable and the actions of the characters believable. Having said all that, I must confess that I enjoyed the serials of Feuillade more than THE HOUSE OF MYSTERY (an inappropriate title). The protracted nature of the serial format seemed at odds with the more restrained aspects of the storyline. It made me want to see the condensed version.
Although Ivan Mosjoukine is clearly the star as he gets to wear a number of disguises and adopt different physical characteristics for each, the film belongs to villain Charles Vanel (WAGES OF FEAR) whose steady underplaying anchors the film and helps to keep it from going too far afield. The supporting character of Rudeberg the amateur photographer as played by Nicolas Koline is also key to the proceedings (his scruffy appearance is unforgettable). The restoration work on HOUSE OF MYSTERY is exemplary. The images look great and Neil Brand's piano score does yeoman work without ever becoming tiresome. The movie is quite remarkable and should be seen by every silent film enthusiast. How often is up to them...For more reviews visit The Capsule Critic.
I have long been a fan of the silent serial especially those of French director Louis Feuillade. His FANTOMAS, JUDEX, and especially LES VAMPIRES set the template for others to follow. These and such German offerings as THE SPIDERS are concerned with master criminals, vast organizations devoted to crime and fearless crime fighters determined to bring them to an end. Pure escapism for a growing cinema audience trying to escape the horrors of World War I. HOUSE OF MYSTERY (1921-23) is different. It takes the structure of the serial and imposes a deeper, more dramatic, and more personal element into the storyline.
On the surface the story borrows heavily from THE COUNT OF MONTE CRISTO. Man is wrongfully accused of crime and unjustly convicted. He is sent to a penal colony where he escapes and is presumed dead. He returns in disguise to bring the true culprit to justice. Director Alexandre Volkoff and star and co-writer Ivan Mosjoukine take this basic plotline and add the serial tropes of multiple disguises, complicated plot developments and an extended chase sequence. The film is also divided into 10 chapters and runs 6 1/2 hours! Of course no one was meant to sit through all 10 chapters at once. It took me 4 days (3 chapters a day and the bonus features last).
Now that I've seen it all, I was very impressed. The cinematography (by 3 cameramen) is stunning. The silhouette wedding recalls the work of Maurice Tourneur. The performances for most of the time are restrained and heartfelt, and the storyline based on a book rather than a magazine or newspaper publication has a lot more depth. The locations are memorable and the actions of the characters believable. Having said all that, I must confess that I enjoyed the serials of Feuillade more than THE HOUSE OF MYSTERY (an inappropriate title). The protracted nature of the serial format seemed at odds with the more restrained aspects of the storyline. It made me want to see the condensed version.
Although Ivan Mosjoukine is clearly the star as he gets to wear a number of disguises and adopt different physical characteristics for each, the film belongs to villain Charles Vanel (WAGES OF FEAR) whose steady underplaying anchors the film and helps to keep it from going too far afield. The supporting character of Rudeberg the amateur photographer as played by Nicolas Koline is also key to the proceedings (his scruffy appearance is unforgettable). The restoration work on HOUSE OF MYSTERY is exemplary. The images look great and Neil Brand's piano score does yeoman work without ever becoming tiresome. The movie is quite remarkable and should be seen by every silent film enthusiast. How often is up to them...For more reviews visit The Capsule Critic.
When you consider that this seven hour episode film has been lost for ` eighty years, you realize how sloppy the business of keeping the best movie material circulating really is.
A great outing for Ivan Mosjoukine who managed to become the mega heart throb star of Tsarist Russia and, a decade later, European film, this one has him as part Ulysses, part Othello, battling broad shouldered Charles Vanel (youngest I've ever seen him) - jail breaking by stealing a train, punching it out on the top of a mountain, being a master of disguises and goodness knows what else in the hours missing represented by inset titles, in the feature version .
The star is riveting as he always was. The support are great. The production values superior and the direction imaginative. This is a film which would delight audiences who snooze through THE LAST LAUGH or BATTLESHIP POTEMKIN and any scheme of values that gives those priority over it is suspect.
Fortunately MAISON DU MYSTERE survives in the superior print restored by Rene Lichtig for Langlois' French Film Museum. The sad part is that so many people who would have loved this have never seen it and probably never will.
A great outing for Ivan Mosjoukine who managed to become the mega heart throb star of Tsarist Russia and, a decade later, European film, this one has him as part Ulysses, part Othello, battling broad shouldered Charles Vanel (youngest I've ever seen him) - jail breaking by stealing a train, punching it out on the top of a mountain, being a master of disguises and goodness knows what else in the hours missing represented by inset titles, in the feature version .
The star is riveting as he always was. The support are great. The production values superior and the direction imaginative. This is a film which would delight audiences who snooze through THE LAST LAUGH or BATTLESHIP POTEMKIN and any scheme of values that gives those priority over it is suspect.
Fortunately MAISON DU MYSTERE survives in the superior print restored by Rene Lichtig for Langlois' French Film Museum. The sad part is that so many people who would have loved this have never seen it and probably never will.
10miyamoto
The scope of the film, covering over 18 years, deserves to be treated as a serial. Essentially a murder mystery with the gardener, an amateur photographer, taking a picture of a murder The murder is seen reflected in the lens of his camera.
Naturally an innocent man is arrested - and convicted of the murder.
There is a tremendously innovative wedding sequence, filmed as though it were a zoetrope.
The film shown at MOMA was tinted. With 150 people present, the audience began clapping at the end of chapter 3 and didn't stop until the final chapter.
Naturally an innocent man is arrested - and convicted of the murder.
There is a tremendously innovative wedding sequence, filmed as though it were a zoetrope.
The film shown at MOMA was tinted. With 150 people present, the audience began clapping at the end of chapter 3 and didn't stop until the final chapter.
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaFilm composed of 10 episodes: 1. L'Ami felon. 2. Le secret de L'etang. 3. L'Ambition au service de la haine. 4. L'Implacable verdict. 5. Le Pont vivant. 6. La Voix du sang. 7. Les Caprices du destin. 8. En Champ clos. 9. Les Angoisses de Corradin. 10. Le Triomphe de L'amour.
- ConnectionsVersion of La maison du mystère (1933)
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Also known as
- The House of Mystery
- Filming locations
- Paris, France(Julien in Paris for business)
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime6 hours 22 minutes
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 1.33 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content
