Trio of stories about lesbian couples in three different decades.
Popularity
4,593
( 213)
Read our editors' picks for the movies and shows we're watching in March, including "The Falcon and the Winter Soldier," Boss Level, and Zack Snyder's Justice League.
Related News
-
‘Two of Us’ Film Review: Older-Lesbian Love Story Doesn’t Hold Together
04 February 2021 | The Wrap -
Emmys flashback 20 years ago to 2000: ‘The West Wing’ dominance, 1st win for James Gandolfini, emotional Michael J. Fox victory
01 September 2020 | Gold Derby -
Vanessa Redgrave movies: 15 greatest films ranked worst to best
20 February 2020 | Gold Derby
Check out the most anticipated movies and TV to stream in March, including Zack Snyder's Justice League, Godzilla vs. Kong, and more.
User Lists
Related lists from IMDb users
Share this Rating
Title: If These Walls Could Talk 2 (TV Movie 2000)
Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.
Edit
Cast
Edit
Plot Summary
|
Add Synopsis
Storyline
Semi-follow-up of If These Walls Could Talk (1996), with three segments set in the same house, but with different occupants, spanning nearly forty years. While the first movie dealt with the topic of abortion, this deals with the topic of lesbianism.
Taglines:
Women love womenMotion Picture Rating (MPAA)
Rated R for sexuality, language and some drug content | See all certifications »Parents Guide:
View content advisory »
Edit
Amy: No.
Linda: Then why do you dress like one?
Amy: This is how I feel comfortable.
Linda: Do you see yourself as a woman?
Amy: Don't you think I know what people think of me? This is me. It can't be any other way.
Linda: Have you ever been...
Amy: [interrupts] What's bothering you? That if we go to breakfast together, people will know what you are because you're with me?
See more »
Did You Know?
Trivia
The film takes place in 1961, 1972 and 2000. See more »Quotes
Linda: So am I the woman, and you're the man?Amy: No.
Linda: Then why do you dress like one?
Amy: This is how I feel comfortable.
Linda: Do you see yourself as a woman?
Amy: Don't you think I know what people think of me? This is me. It can't be any other way.
Linda: Have you ever been...
Amy: [interrupts] What's bothering you? That if we go to breakfast together, people will know what you are because you're with me?
See more »
Frequently Asked Questions
This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.
Edit
See full technical specs »
Details
Country:
USALanguage:
EnglishRelease Date:
5 March 2000 (USA) See more »Also Known As:
If These Walls Could Talk 2 See more »Company Credits
Show more on
IMDbPro »
Three tales of lesbian couples having different struggles across three different time periods. In the sixties a lifelong lesbian couple who have never come out find the difficulties that occur due to them having no legal connection to one another. In the seventies a university student who is a feminist faces her friends' disapproval when she falls for a stereotypical `butch john' lesbian. In the nineties an openly gay couple decide to try for child and start looking for sperm.
I first heard of this film because I always have time for anything that Nia Long does. This caught my eye on her CV and when it came on TV I watched it. I wasn't sure what to expect but most of it works quite well. As the stories are pretty distinct (the only connection being the house) so I'll deal with them so. The first is easily the best and is the most emotionally involving. It is a little too happy and unreal at the start but the tragic situation that Edith finds herself in because of her love is very moving. The second story is a little less real to me as it deals with a problem within the lesbian community (of which I have no experience to speak of). It is less moving and also a little more explicit and may satisfy those who are only interested in lesbians in terms of male arousal! I don't think it is very sexual or overly done but I didn't think there was too much need for it - regardless of the participants sexuality I didn't think it really added to the subject. However the story again is pretty good and is interesting as it is not an issue I was aware of.
The final story is the most optimistic but also the weakest. The `issue' is a lot less serious and the film treats it as such with the whole segment being very light-hearted and bright. It doesn't really add anything to the film and doesn't fit with the first two segments. The cast are pretty much all good. In the first part Redgrave is excellent and her plight is made very real by the strength of her performance. In the second film Sevingy steals the show easily with a good performance. In the third DeGeneres happily underplays and isn't `zany' or `wacky', she is funny but not in an annoying way. Stone is weak because her character simply doesn't fit with her body - far too youthful and carefree to suit Stone. The support add to the feel that this is full of `stars' with Perkins, Giamatti, Long, King and others all doing OK in support.
Overall this film starts strong but gets progressively weaker as it goes, with the final section being quite frivolous compared to the emotion of the opening. It is an interesting film but it doesn't quite work as well as it should have done.